|   Exchg Svr 2003 Certification issue     Posted: 02 Sep 2007 04:12 PM PDT So, I hear your concerns and see your advisements.  Thanks!Now, since I'm unfamiliar with the inner workings of Exch SBS vs Exch
 non-SBS and I have an SBS server, what path and process would you suggest?
 Are the suggestions from John (MVP) correct and can you further clarify what
 you'd suggest relative to SBS.
 I need to establish the mail2.mydomain.com certificate but I only SEE the
 mail.mydomain.com certificate when getting on via OWA.  How do I get Outlook
 to work here too?  Is it ONLY establishing the certificate ON Exchange SBS?
 Again, please provide the SBS path & process.
 I was under the impression that the Exchange Server discussion group was for
 all OS versions for Exchange Server 2003.  After this post, I'll put my posts
 relative to SBS on the SBS Discussion Group.
 
 
 TIA!!!
 Tom
 
 "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   contacts     Posted: 02 Sep 2007 04:12 AM PDT Leonard <microsoft.com> wrote: 
 Presuming Outlook in cached mode, look for entries in their Sync Issues
 folder.
 Try tools | send/receive | download address book - and see what happens.
 
 Post your exact versions & SP levels of everything (including Outlook) if
 you still have problems.
 
 
 
 | 
    |   Verzsamail Activesync Treo 650 error AIRSAMSMEmail.c 2549 1 HTTP/1.1 403 Request Forbidden     Posted: 01 Sep 2007 08:42 PM PDT Yes have done reset.
 This has cone on for some time and trust trying to clean up this nagging
 issue.
 
 "John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
 news:phx.gbl...
 
 
 
 | 
    |   unable to figure out whats wrong...     Posted: 30 Aug 2007 05:39 PM PDT Ok, it's def something with my internet.  I just plugged in myverizion wireless aircard and was able to get the banner.  hmm...dunno
 whats up with that one.
 
 
 | 
    |   Accidently Set Everyones Mailbox permissions to Deny     Posted: 29 Aug 2007 12:54 PM PDT Try DSACLs
 http://support.microsoft.com/kb/281146
 
 Oliver
 
 
 
 | 
    |   OWA Security     Posted: 28 Aug 2007 10:22 AM PDT On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:22:21 -0400, "Mark" <com> wrote:
 If anyone can access anyone's mailbox then you have some kind of
 obvious security setting.
 Look on the security properties of the server to see what has got full
 permissions.
 Look in ADU&C and see the Exchange Domain Servers (and Enterprise).
 What's in there? It will be obvious.
 Look on the properties of a selected account to see what has "full
 mailbox access"
 
 With a problem like this you will see it leap out at you.
 
 | 
    |   Exchange 2007 set a users Out of Office     Posted: 28 Aug 2007 03:46 AM PDT On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:37:07 -0400, "Michael Dragone"<no.e-mail=less_spam> wrote:
 
 Business as usual then. That'll please the helpdesk.
 
 
 | 
    |   A Question About KBs 831464     Posted: 25 Aug 2007 02:54 AM PDT Asif Razzaq Attari <microsoft.com> wrote: 
 The SP version referred to by that message is probably the Exchange SP - and
 means you don't need the fix.
 
 You can reinstall W2003 SP2 - and I think you will need to look further to
 identify the cause of your problem, if the hotfix isn't working/relevant.
 
 
 
 
 | 
    |   Antigen and Event Viewer     Posted: 24 Aug 2007 02:23 AM PDT Hi again. Did it work? I can suggest a registry key instead.
 // Raúl
 
 "Nicolas Macarez" <fr> wrote in message
 news:phx.gbl...
 
 
 
 | 
    |   Multiple Duplicate E-Mails     Posted: 23 Aug 2007 12:22 PM PDT I don't know.  Where/how would I find out?
 "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   Spoofing problem??     Posted: 23 Aug 2007 10:26 AM PDT I will have to check that.  I have message tracking enabled, so will givethat a shot.  I am almost 100% positive that they came from the outside
 though.
 
 I checked the last setting you mentioned, on resolving anonymous
 senders....I do not have that enabled, so I guess I am ok there.
 
 For the other 2:
 
 1)Do you have any links for SenderID filtering, i.e. proper setup, etc.??
 2)Not sure what you mean by make sure display name resolution is not enabled.
 
 "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   Is there a way to remove Exchange Intelligent Message Filter v2?     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 10:50 PM PDT Just don't use it! (... by removing the check mark in SMTP VS properties |General | Advanced | Edit).
 
 Since it's integrated with Exchange Server 2003 SP2, there's no way to
 remove it individually - you would have to remove SP2.
 --
 Bharat Suneja
 MVP - Exchange
 www.zenprise.com
 NEW blog location:
 exchangepedia.com/blog
 ----------------------------------------------
 
 
 "amylfg" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
 news:com...
 
 
 
 | 
    |   Staff directory with pictures based on Address Book?     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 02:53 PM PDT Something I wrote for my then employer... probably not worth scrubbing allthe proprietary info out, and I don't fancy myself as a web developer... :)
 
 ... email me offline and I'll see if I can find it/can be scrubbed.
 
 Also, if you look around on the web I'm fairly positive you'll see some
 stuff posted, which was my starting point. (Can't quite remember what it was
 called or from which site(s)... ).
 --
 Bharat Suneja
 MVP - Exchange
 www.zenprise.com
 NEW blog location:
 exchangepedia.com/blog
 ----------------------------------------------
 
 
 "William Hamilton" <com> wrote in message
 news:com...
 
 
 | 
    |   RPC over HTTP - Setup Question     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 12:44 PM PDT Ok..thanks.
 "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   Compatibility issue with W2k3 SP2     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 08:32 AM PDT The whole question is really coming from what 926031 DOES NOT sayâ¦
 If I understand you correctly OWA in a clustered Exchange 2003 SP2 on W2k3
 SP2 works fine⦠ OWA in a clustered Exchange 2003 SP1 (and base code) does
 not work on Windows Server 2003 SP2 (and prior).
 
 926031 does not say that⦠ Do you have any influence within Microsoft to
 have them update 926031 so that it is more clear on this compatibility issue?
 
 Thanks!
 
 "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   permissions Calendar     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 08:30 AM PDT I would like to do it with all the mailbox's, no only my mailbox.And change the default policy.
 
 "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   leave msgs on server for OWA with 2003?     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 08:26 AM PDT Oh, right.  Well, OWA always leaves the messages on the server.  Unless youdeliberately delete them, of course.  The POP client should easily be
 configured to remove the messages from the server.
 
 
 "Les Caudle" <nospam> wrote in message
 news:com...
 
 
 
 | 
    |   delay messages     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 06:28 AM PDT Hello Bret,
 Thank you for your update.
 
 Based on my research, the IP 77.194.251.164 and 203.236.112.95 are not the
 MX of yahoo.com. You Exchange try to send email to yahoo.com to a wrong
 address.
 
 There are 2 probably reasons caused this issue: the wrong DNS or the SMTP
 connector.
 
 Reason 1: Wrong DNS
 Your SBS cannot resolve correct IP address from yahoo.com. If you SBS DNS
 pointing to itself, please check the DNS server on your SBS:
 
 1. Open DNS management console on SBS (run command "dnsmgmt.msc")
 2. Right click the server name, select Clear Cache.
 
 You can run nslookup command on SBS as following:
 
 1.  Open a command prompt.
 2.  Type the following:
 nslookup
 3.  Type the following:
 set q=mx
 This sets a filter to only collect Internet Mail Exchanger (MX) records and
 related information.
 4.  Type the following
 domain_name .com
 
 where domain_name is the domain that you want to obtain the DNS records
 for, for example, microsoft.com or msn.com.
 
 Please compare the result with the following page. Are they same?
 
 http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=yahoo.com&type=MX&token=plumisl
 and
 
 Reason 2: You create SMTP connector for the yahoo.com domain. Please check
 the SMTP connector on SBS. Ensure you do not send email to yaoo.com thru
 smart host.
 
 I hope these steps will give you some help.
 
 Thanks and have a nice day!
 
 Best regards,
 
 Terence Liu(MSFT)
 
 Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
 
 Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
 
 ==================================================  ===
 This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
 regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding
 newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner.
 You can locate the newsgroup here:
 http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
 
 When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the
 "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are
 any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader,
 please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
 issue.
 
 Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
 provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
 different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing
 so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
 
 For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please
 check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
 
 Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
 ==================================================  ===
 
 This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
 
 --------------------
 | From: "Bret Snipes" <nospam>
 | References: <ezsV$phx.gbl>
 <phx.gbl>
 <#phx.gbl>
 <phx.gbl>
 <phx.gbl>
 <phx.gbl>
 <phx.gbl>
 <#phx.gbl>
 | Subject: Re: delay messages
 | Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 08:05:09 -0500
 | Lines: 275
 | X-Priority: 3
 | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
 | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
 | X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
 | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
 | Message-ID: <#phx.gbl>
 | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.misc
 | NNTP-Posting-Host: sharedata.koehlerpro.com 70.255.115.170
 | Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSF  TNGP04.phx.gbl
 | Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.misc:3944
 | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.misc
 |
 | I setup smtp logging as suggested.  Sent a test email and here are the
 | results.  The results are for the time that was listed on the email.  I
 did
 | a mx lookup for yahoo.com and did a ping -a to see if the ip were from
 yahoo
 | but the mx records did not match and the ping -a did not return a server
 | with a yahoo name.  Why would 203.236.112.95 just quit without going
 through
 | the process as the previous mail?
 | 06:51:00 77.194.251.164 HELO - 250
 | 06:51:00 77.194.251.164 MAIL - 250
 | 06:51:00 77.194.251.164 RCPT - 250
 | 06:51:01 77.194.251.164 DATA - 250
 | 06:51:01 77.194.251.164 QUIT - 240
 | 06:51:09 203.236.112.95 QUIT - 240
 |
 | Oh by the way - thanks for your help!!!!
 | Bret
 |
 | "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
 | news:%phx.gbl...
 | > Google "'Exchange 2003' SMTP Protocol Logging".
 | > --
 | > Ed Crowley
 | > MVP - Exchange
 | > "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
 | >
 | > "Bret Snipes" <nospam> wrote in message
 | > news:phx.gbl...
 | >> Which logging do you recommend.  The diagnostic logging in the server
 | >> properties (and which ones to turn on) or the logging for the smtp
 | >> virtual server?
 | >>
 | >> Bret
 | >>
 | >> "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
 | >> news:phx.gbl...
 | >>> Have you turned on protocol logging and examined the SMTP session
 | >>> between the server and Yahoo! Mail?
 | >>> --
 | >>> Ed Crowley
 | >>> MVP - Exchange
 | >>> "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
 | >>>
 | >>> "Bret Snipes" <nospam> wrote in message
 | >>> news:phx.gbl...
 | >>>> In the previous messages I stated that I DO have reverse lookup set
 for
 | >>>> the public side of my exchange server. The mail stays in the queue
 | >>>> until the set experation time reaches its limit.  Also we have
 verified
 | >>>> that the mail never gets to the receipent.  To every yahoo address
 we
 | >>>> send does not get delivered and we have verified that it does not
 get
 | >>>> to the receipent. We have also verified the yahoo addressed we send
 to.
 | >>>>
 | >>>>
 | >>>> "Terence Liu [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in
 message
 | >>>> news:phx.gbl...
 | >>>>> Hello Bret,
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Thank you for posting here.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> According to your description, I understand that the client receive
 | >>>>> the
 | >>>>> Delivery Status Notification (Delay) messages when sending messages
 to
 | >>>>> Yahoo.com. If I have misunderstood your concern, please let me know.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> This Delivery Status Report is generated if the Exchange Server
 cannot
 | >>>>> deliver a message in a period of time. This can be configured in the
 | >>>>> properties page of the SMTP virtual server:
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> - Open the Properties page of the SMTP virtual server.
 | >>>>> - On the Delivery tab, please check the "Delivery Notification"
 list.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> I would explain that the Delivery Status Notification (DSN) just
 | >>>>> indicates
 | >>>>> that the e-mail is delayed to be delivered but not failed to be
 | >>>>> delivered.
 | >>>>> Usually, this issue may occur if the destination mail server is
 busy
 | >>>>> at the
 | >>>>> time when we send email messages to it through Exchange Server.
 When
 | >>>>> the
 | >>>>> email message cannot be delivered in time, Exchange will give us a
 DSN
 | >>>>> and
 | >>>>> inform us that the message will be delayed. After this, Exchange
 | >>>>> Server
 | >>>>> will continue to connect to the destination server for retry. The
 | >>>>> expiration timeout setting of DSN can be configured in Exchange
 System
 | >>>>> Manager (ESM) -> SMTP Virtual Server Properties.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Therefore, before we go any further, I would like to verify if the
 DSN
 | >>>>> just
 | >>>>> occurs intermittently and the email messages sent to those certain
 | >>>>> domains
 | >>>>> are delivered successfully eventually (the recipients finally got
 the
 | >>>>> e-mail). If so, this is not a problem of your Exchange Server but
 just
 | >>>>> the
 | >>>>> case that the destination server may be too busy to receive your
 | >>>>> emails at
 | >>>>> that time, and we can safely ignore it.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> In addition, based on my experience, this delay Delivery Status
 Report
 | >>>>> often occurs when send email to the email servers that are require
 | >>>>> reverse
 | >>>>> look up and your exchange server does not have a PTR record. If
 this
 | >>>>> is
 | >>>>> your case, you can resolve this with the following two options:
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> 1. Adding a Reverse DNS record
 | >>>>> 2. Using Smart host
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> I hope these steps will give you some help.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Thanks and have a nice day!
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Best regards,
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Terence Liu(MSFT)
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> ==================================================  ===
 | >>>>> This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have
 | >>>>> issues
 | >>>>> regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
 | >>>>> corresponding
 | >>>>> newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
 | >>>>> manner.
 | >>>>> You can locate the newsgroup here:
 | >>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you
 | >>>>> check the
 | >>>>> "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when
 there
 | >>>>> are
 | >>>>> any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
 | >>>>> newsreader,
 | >>>>> please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from
 your
 | >>>>> issue.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread.
 Although
 | >>>>> we
 | >>>>> provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
 | >>>>> different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean.
 In
 | >>>>> doing
 | >>>>> so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
 | >>>>> Please
 | >>>>> check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone
 numbers.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
 | >>>>> ==================================================  ===
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
 | >>>>> rights.
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>> --------------------
 | >>>>> | From: "Bret Snipes" <nospam>
 | >>>>> | References: <ezsV$phx.gbl>
 | >>>>> <phx.gbl>
 | >>>>> | Subject: Re: delay messages
 | >>>>> | Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:54:43 -0500
 | >>>>> | Lines: 74
 | >>>>> | X-Priority: 3
 | >>>>> | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
 | >>>>> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
 | >>>>> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
 | >>>>> | X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
 | >>>>> | Message-ID: <#phx.gbl>
 | >>>>> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.exchange.misc
 | >>>>> | NNTP-Posting-Host: sharedata.koehlerpro.com 70.255.115.170
 | >>>>> | Path:
 | >>>>> TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSF  TNGP06.phx.gbl
 | >>>>> | Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.exchange.misc:3890
 | >>>>> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.exchange.misc
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>> | Yes, we have a valid PTR record, yes we use static IP and no we
 are
 | >>>>> not
 | >>>>> | blacklisted.  These are the first things I verified
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>> | Bret
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>> | "Ed Crowley [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
 | >>>>> | news:phx.gbl...
 | >>>>> | > Does your server have a valid PTR record?  Do you use a static
 IP
 | >>>>> address?
 | >>>>> | > Are you blacklisted?
 | >>>>> | > --
 | >>>>> | > Ed Crowley
 | >>>>> | > MVP - Exchange
 | >>>>> | > "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"
 | >>>>> | >
 | >>>>> | > "Bret Snipes" <nospam> wrote in message
 | >>>>> | > news:ezsV$phx.gbl...
 | >>>>> | >>I am getting delay messages that come from sending to a
 particular
 | >>>>> | >>domain - yahoo.com.  When ever we send to someone at yahoo.com
 we
 | >>>>> get
 | >>>>> the
 | >>>>> | >>following message sent back to the sender.  The mail stays in
 the
 | >>>>> queue
 | >>>>> | >>trying to resend for the set time.  When i look at the
 properties
 | >>>>> of
 | >>>>> the
 | >>>>> | >>message in the queue the status is retry remote delevery and it
 | >>>>> says
 | >>>>> there
 | >>>>> | >>was an "An SMTP protocol error occurred.  I have tried to look
 | >>>>> resolutions
 | >>>>> | >>& contact info on yahoo but cannot find anything, we have
 checked
 | >>>>> to
 | >>>>> see
 | >>>>> | >>if we are on any block lists and it has turned up negative.
 All
 | >>>>> other
 | >>>>> | >>mail works fine. This started about 3-4 weeks ago, before we
 were
 | >>>>> able
 | >>>>> to
 | >>>>> | >>send to yahoo accounts.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Any ideas on resolving this issue will be greatly appreciated.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> From: com [mailto:com]
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 9:43 PM
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> To: Computer User
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status
 Notification.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed.
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>       com
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Thanks in advance
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >> Bret
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >>
 | >>>>> | >
 | >>>>> | >
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>> |
 | >>>>>
 | >>>>
 | >>>>
 | >>>
 | >>>
 | >>
 | >>
 | >
 | >
 |
 |
 |
 
 
 | 
    |   Deleting emails get forwarded to another users mailbox     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 03:18 AM PDT Well im not lying. That is what was happening. I have now upgraded to Outlook2003 and the problem has gone.
 
 Thanks for all your help
 
 "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 
 
 | 
    |   rename a computer name running exchange 2003     Posted: 22 Aug 2007 02:50 AM PDT You will still need to remove Exchange first, rename, then re-installExchange
 
 Oliver
 
 
 
 |