Multiple users accessing single mailbox - Microsoft Exchange |
- Multiple users accessing single mailbox
- Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 842801 - MSExchangeTransport
- what type of virus protection is best for exchange
- unable to telnet to exchange server lan nor wan
- How to: Notify that the email address has changed
- OWA SSL quit working
- Group Schedules & OWA
- e-mail with attachments not arriving.
- xp pro upgrade
- OWA on Exchange 5.5
- Migration from Outlook pst using POP3/SMTP to Exchange 2003
- Making XP look & feel like Win98
- Catchall Sinks
- Exchange 2003 Test Recovery
- Duplicate E Mails
- OWA 2003 in a DMZ
- Message recall
- Move Exchange 5.5 to new hard ware and keep the same server name.
- Exchange 2003 - Native Mode vs. Mixed Mode
| Multiple users accessing single mailbox Posted: 04 Aug 2004 10:34 AM PDT I tried that through the Mailbox Permissions button on the Exchange Advanced tab in Active Directory but it did not seem to allow those users to access the mailbox. What exaclty do the permission in that Exchange Advanced tab do? "Chris Ahlers [MSFT]" <Microsoft.Com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... Security do configure ================================================== ========================== rights. ================================================== ========================== but I somewhere |
| Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 842801 - MSExchangeTransport Posted: 03 Aug 2004 05:18 PM PDT Thank you for you help KB article, you px name.<domain>>, |
| what type of virus protection is best for exchange Posted: 03 Aug 2004 01:43 PM PDT This is, of course, independent of how you do a file scan of the Exchange box. When you do install a client, be sure that you do not do a file scan of the Exchange directories, especially the ones with the database and log files. If NAV finds an infection, it might quarantine or, even worse, delete the "infected" file. This can have catastrophic consequences to Exchange. Post back if you need help in identifying what directories to exclude. Also, consider carefully whether or not you want Real Time Protection enabled. In general, it's not a good idea (IMHO) to have it enabled on a server. If I enable it on a server, it's restricted to directories that a user has write access to. In most cases it will just slow down the performance of a server for no real advantage. Be sure, though, to schedule at least daily scans of the server as well as Live Updates. -- Regards, Hank Arnold "Hank Arnold" <com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... on using? |
| unable to telnet to exchange server lan nor wan Posted: 03 Aug 2004 12:03 PM PDT That wouldn't explain why he can't connect to the SMTP server from the server itself, though.... microsoft.com wrote: |
| How to: Notify that the email address has changed Posted: 03 Aug 2004 07:23 AM PDT Javier Villegas wrote: Why not just make sure your recipient policy is set up for both address formats and make the new one the default - and then you can get mail sent to either address in the same mailbox? any replies will come from the 'new' address - you can also put an Outlook signature in that states something like "Please note that my new email address is ____" Why not just make sure your recipient policy is set up for both address formats and make the new one the default - and then you can get mail sent to either address in the same mailbox? any replies will come from the 'new' address - you can also put an Outlook signature in that states something like "Please note that my new email address is ____" |
| Posted: 03 Aug 2004 05:52 AM PDT When you change to 444, the system works perfectly, and then when you do portqry -n <servername> -e 443, it still say's https service listening. port 443? anything like that? working, on on server. may like What |
| Posted: 03 Aug 2004 02:43 AM PDT Yes, but can not have a calender to each person, considered using Group Schedule in Public folders but again doesn't appear to be available in OWA "PES" wrote: |
| e-mail with attachments not arriving. Posted: 03 Aug 2004 02:39 AM PDT Ah, I thought you meant the problem was with OE6 clients *receiving* attachments. Are they connecting to your server at all? Or do they have their own? Steve Foreshore wrote: |
| Posted: 02 Aug 2004 10:47 PM PDT The xp pro disc should be fine. Just pop-in the CD and click on upgrade. You will have to run all the windowsupdates after the xp pro installation. "com" wrote: |
| Posted: 02 Aug 2004 03:55 PM PDT These are the things that I have found will prevent a user from gaining access to OWA: Using an AOL or Google toolbar - if this is the case have your user remain online but minimize the toolbar and open Internet Explorer toolbar instead. Firewall - If he's using XP and has the firewall enabled, or is using another type of personal firewall, he will need to change his settings to allow access to OWA. Cookies - if cookies is disabled, or if his internet security it too high, that will prevent access too, he may just need to re-adjust his settings. Hope this is helpful. Joann "Matthew Tisdel" wrote: |
| Migration from Outlook pst using POP3/SMTP to Exchange 2003 Posted: 01 Aug 2004 09:00 AM PDT Thanks to all for great feedback. C "Clementius" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eUoJ8C%phx.gbl... |
| Making XP look & feel like Win98 Posted: 31 Jul 2004 11:16 AM PDT On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:16:25 -0700, "Peter Withey" <net> wrote in microsoft.public.exchange.misc: Control Panel/Display/Theme: Windows Classic? -- Michael Bednarek http://mbednarek.com/ "POST NO BILLS" |
| Posted: 30 Jul 2004 12:45 PM PDT Glad to help! microsoft.com wrote: |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2004 02:21 PM PDT Can you explain the 'Recover Storage Group' and 'backing up to a file rather than tape' in more detail? How are they used and created or set up? Is there a document or book out there that would help me? Thanks, ~Jaye "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:com... server. databases and backup perform |
| Posted: 29 Jul 2004 03:16 AM PDT Hi Richard, Even if you may not have this issue, this is a good fix to install http://support.microsoft.com/?id=835734 -- Niclas Holmkvist Microsoft Exchange Support --- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. "Richard" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:64d901c47555$2c5ba510$gbl... |
| Posted: 28 Jul 2004 03:58 PM PDT Thanks for the response. I was hoping for an answer like that :). Aside from using the IIS Lockdown tool from Microsoft, Is there anything else running on Win 2003/Exchange 2000 by default that I should be worried about? Do you know of any good articles that address this or list out the min. Services that need to be running on a Front-End OWA Server? Thanks again, -Elkan I've server firewall? secure it within an to its internal IP. ports between DMZ and effectively render the DMZ with registry Domain open communication, and yes, |
| Posted: 28 Jul 2004 02:09 PM PDT I was actually looking for information as far as it working over an x.400 connection. we have multiple sites and it seems to not work between sites but does (to some degree :-)) within the same site. We really don't depend on it, I would just like to clarify whether or not it is "supposed" to work between sites or not. Exch 5.5 sp4 by the way. Thanks. "Martin Blackstone [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: |
| Move Exchange 5.5 to new hard ware and keep the same server name. Posted: 28 Jul 2004 09:52 AM PDT Thank You !!!! another us;q155216 |
| Exchange 2003 - Native Mode vs. Mixed Mode Posted: 27 Jul 2004 02:42 PM PDT Hi Mark, I knew there was some mystical powers in Exchange! Anyway, can I change to Native mode anytime or is it best to do that sort of change off hours? Thanks, ~Jaye "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:com... 2003 is and the has |
| You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
