Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept - Microsoft Exchange |
- Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept
- How can one tell if Exchange has been installed in a forest?
- If you remove the Exchange server from the domain and re-add it, will you encounter any major problems?
- Single user can log on to OWA, Outlook fails - Urgent help please
- Email problem with Office 2007 Attachments
- Can a UIDL be non-unique? 2nd request
- First Ex2007 in Ex2003 Org - [WP]
- two users one mailbox
- PowerShell Export-Mailbox filtering does not work
- delete old e-mail
- Email Forms submittal
- How to block russian commercial spam ?
- Mail Delay for One User - [WP]
- Count user accounts in storage group
- Hardware recommendations for Exchange 2007 - 40 Gig store - 50 cli
- Mailbox Manager Registry keys
- Can a UIDL not be unique?
- Relay Error NDR Sending from Distribution List
- Exchange to Exchange GAL Access on 2 Forests
- Exchange Server 2003 Performance Counters
- Can Exch. 2003 Ent. Be Migrated to 2007 Standard?
- Calendar Items to the wrong people
- Moving Mailboxes via script
- Macbook snyc with exchange
Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept Posted: 01 Sep 2008 10:58 PM PDT Thank's Massimo. This registry settings really do the trick. Regards,Miha "Massimo" <it> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
How can one tell if Exchange has been installed in a forest? Posted: 01 Sep 2008 02:08 PM PDT For the group's benefit (you all have been so good to me), I took a look at the AD Schema BEFORE and AFTER an Exchange forest prep. BEFORE forestprep, there was only ONE mch* entry in the Schema. Afterwards, there was an *explosion* in number of mch* entries. It went from 1 to 114! And that was just for forestprep! |
Posted: 01 Sep 2008 11:41 AM PDT Bring it back online. |
Single user can log on to OWA, Outlook fails - Urgent help please Posted: 31 Aug 2008 04:59 PM PDT Yes it does resolve... I posted this earlier, but the post seems to have failed. - I think I found a solution here in Experts Exchange (you need to be a subscriber). Basically I fixed it by logging on as client and changing the Outlook Profile to prompt for credentials (security tab). Then opened Outlook. I was then able to close Outlook, change the Outlook Profile to no longer request credentials. Then when I reopened Outlook it worked fine. Any feedback if you have it is also appreciated. Bucket www.teamterry.net _ "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
Email problem with Office 2007 Attachments Posted: 31 Aug 2008 04:34 AM PDT Hi, Are you using a SBS server? If yes I would post this in a SBs group since there might be a filter on the SBS exchange - a standard exchange server does not have such a filter. Leif "Malik Asif Joyia" <microsoft.com> skrev i meddelelsen news:com... |
Can a UIDL be non-unique? 2nd request Posted: 29 Aug 2008 02:15 PM PDT In article <phx.gbl>, net says... What's another exchange resource on the web where I can ask? UIDL if you read aobut it is a lot like a primary key in a database table. It's got to be important for people who program against email stores. |
First Ex2007 in Ex2003 Org - [WP] Posted: 29 Aug 2008 08:14 AM PDT Thanks Mark for your input. Yes, I knew it, just wanted to make sure. Cos in production ... I will deploying CAS Role first on 2 different servers with NLB, then I will put HTS on these same boxes one by one .... I will then have to make sure that I add the second HTS to the two way RGC which gets created when the first HTS is deployed ..... I am having fun here with all those typos when I create those connectors using the cmdlets. "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 29 Aug 2008 03:02 AM PDT "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... "Send is" is the solutio, thx for help |
PowerShell Export-Mailbox filtering does not work Posted: 29 Aug 2008 02:08 AM PDT I'm using an MSDN version. -- Serge "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 28 Aug 2008 01:42 PM PDT Hello, You mean I just create a blank exchange database then move old date e-mail to this new blank database? Is this possible for outlook 2003 can have 2 exchange databse? and how? So far, I combine one exchange database and PST files. Thanks "John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 28 Aug 2008 06:41 AM PDT No it isn't in the queues. It appears to be stuck on the server that I'm sending it from, which doesn't have Exchange, only the smtp service installed. I noticed that the address I'm sending from has to just be the internal account name, but the address I'm sending to needs to be the entire address, even when they're the same address. This may be by design, I don't know. Thanks "Michael Dragone" wrote: |
How to block russian commercial spam ? Posted: 27 Aug 2008 11:59 PM PDT Ed Crowley [MVP] <net> wrote: Go Bears? |
Mail Delay for One User - [WP] Posted: 27 Aug 2008 11:09 AM PDT Thanks Ed for your input. The user using OL2002 was set to offline ...so now I have config her OL to online and lets see, "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
Count user accounts in storage group Posted: 26 Aug 2008 11:53 PM PDT Andy thanks again for help. I didn't know that this could be done through EMC fitler settings. Regards,Miha "Andy David {MVP}" <com> wrote in message news:com... |
Hardware recommendations for Exchange 2007 - 40 Gig store - 50 cli Posted: 26 Aug 2008 10:35 PM PDT RAM looks low. I just got done with a really nasty issue with the AMD dual core opterons. Even though the server is Windows 2003 R2 SP2, still ended up having to put the \usepmtimer switch in the boot.ini. See: http://blogs.technet.com/clint_huffman/archive/2008/03/21/warning-perf-counter-data-might-be-inaccurate-on-some-amd-processor-computers.aspx http://blogs.technet.com/mikelag/archive/2008/08/26/certain-amd-processors-might-cause-inaccurate-counter-data.aspx When memory is tight, working set trimming is a larger issue, so look at the recommendations in http://blogs.technet.com/mikelag/archive/2007/12/19/working-set-trimming.aspx as well. You don't mention anything about storage, what were you planning on using for disk? "Bucket" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 26 Aug 2008 06:09 PM PDT Hi Mark, I've set the start time on the servers to be Saturday at 6:00p (using the 15-min view). I had been running mailbox manager in 'generate report only' mode for the last month to let users see what was going to happen when it actually changed to 'delete immediately' mode. Since changing to 'delete only' mode, the process does not run through all the mailboxes (there are a lot of messages to delete!) but still produces the 'has run successfully' report. So, I was thinking there was possibly a time limit set as to how long the process runs. On some of my servers it will run for 45 minutes and stop, some close to 2 hours. But none of them finish processing all mailboxes like it did when I was in 'generate report only' mode. Hope that helps to clarify. Thanks for your time! "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 26 Aug 2008 01:27 PM PDT In article <#phx.gbl>, net says... (I really need help with this, so I'm reposting) OK. Frankly I don't know much of anything about the exchange server, how it's used, so I can't say if it's being used in that manner or not. Can someone respond re my original questions? Is it possible for UIDLs to be non unique? There are only 200 messages on this exchange server, and most of the most recent 20 or so are using duplicate UIDLs, at least according to the info I have. Also is AAQG2TxAAAArJjnk2yIOau008N6VeH1P a 'normal' looking UIDL from exchange? Or does it look truncated? My suspicion is that somehow the UIDL values are being truncated, and thus rendered apparent duplicates from the persective of my software. |
Relay Error NDR Sending from Distribution List Posted: 26 Aug 2008 09:12 AM PDT What you're seeing could happen if DNS is somehow configured to send mail for a domain to the wrong server. Of course, it could just be a misconfigured environment at the recipient's end. -- Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." .. "Stingray" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Exchange to Exchange GAL Access on 2 Forests Posted: 26 Aug 2008 08:23 AM PDT Consider why you think you'd need a child domain. There's really nothing you get with a child domain that you can't get with delegated organizational units except extra cost. -- Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." .. "Flaps" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Exchange Server 2003 Performance Counters Posted: 26 Aug 2008 02:05 AM PDT S H A R I Q U E <microsoft.com> wrote: They aren't mutually exclusive. Yes indeed. Not necessarily. It's a good idea to have them on different ones, but most of my small office servers are configured similarly, although with SAS or SCSI drives. You can't tell anything until you get yourself into a supported & patched configuration, really. |
Can Exch. 2003 Ent. Be Migrated to 2007 Standard? Posted: 25 Aug 2008 03:49 PM PDT Whoever you talked to was wrong. You can most definitely "transition" from Enterprise to Standard due to the reason Ed stated; you cannot do an in-place upgrade. -- Elan Shudnow http://www.shudnow.net "Diane" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com: |
Calendar Items to the wrong people Posted: 25 Aug 2008 02:31 PM PDT Burnabyryan <microsoft.com> wrote: There has to be something set up in the delegate or rules settings for this. Check in the recipient's Outlook. And by recipient I mean the one who has the delegate. |
Posted: 25 Aug 2008 02:24 PM PDT I maintain that my way is best for the scenario you describe. Still if you're constantly moving lots of mailboxes, something is wrong with your provisioning process. -- Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." .. "Bob Smith" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 25 Aug 2008 01:16 PM PDT Martin Blackstone [MVP] <com> wrote: I'd go for that (or other virtualization sw) rather than bootcamp. Much easier on the users. |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |