Exchange 2007 - Anti-Spam only for specified users? - Microsoft Exchange |
- Exchange 2007 - Anti-Spam only for specified users?
- cant send to email address in France
- exchange 2000 mailbox recipient policy will not delete subfolders
- Sync Mobile 6 with Exchange Not working
- CCR Clustering
- Clustering
- Port 443 Banner
- Exchange 5.5 Free/Busy on public calander
- OWA issues with email attachments
- SMTP Queues "hang" intermittently
- Exchange 2007 and Office Communications Server 2007 on Same Machin
- Exchange 2007 Resources and Outlook 2003
- Kerberos NTLM
- Email storage and CRM
Exchange 2007 - Anti-Spam only for specified users? Posted: 13 May 2008 06:13 AM PDT Great! I did see that parameter, but I didn't know I could use it for individual mailboxes. It seemed to me that it was a global setting. I'll look more into that cmdlet usage. Thanks, Steve "Neil Hobson [MVP]" wrote: |
cant send to email address in France Posted: 09 May 2008 03:44 PM PDT On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:02:00 -0700, jdc <microsoft.com> wrote: Glad you got it working. |
exchange 2000 mailbox recipient policy will not delete subfolders Posted: 09 May 2008 07:38 AM PDT It does work on some of the subfolders, just not all of them. the log shows the subfolder and email within, it just wont delete them. but it will delete others in subfolders in the same location. not sure how it would pick and choose. Thanks "Bharat Suneja [MSFT]" wrote: |
Sync Mobile 6 with Exchange Not working Posted: 09 May 2008 07:01 AM PDT I posted int SBS newsgroups. I reinstalled Activesync 4.5. I reset the phone. But when I entered configuration information for setup I get this message. "Microsoft Exchange did not accept your login credentials click retry to enter your credentials again or click continue to sync with smartphone anyway." I've checked the exchange server setup for mobile set up. It is correct. I checked the user permissions and they are authorized for mobile. The user can remote in using OWA from the Smartphone. "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: |
Posted: 09 May 2008 06:13 AM PDT Thanks Bharat "Bharat Suneja [MSFT]" wrote: |
Posted: 07 May 2008 01:44 PM PDT Thanks Bharat "Bharat Suneja [MSFT]" wrote: |
Posted: 06 May 2008 09:46 AM PDT "Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" <email a@t leederbyshire d.0.t c.0.m> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... BTW, check to see if you already have a URLScan.ini file, before you install it. If you have SBS, it will already be there. |
Exchange 5.5 Free/Busy on public calander Posted: 06 May 2008 08:13 AM PDT On Tue, 6 May 2008 16:29:30 +0100, "Giorgio" <com> wrote: No. :) Using a resource mailbox is the recommended way to do this. |
OWA issues with email attachments Posted: 06 May 2008 07:55 AM PDT Ed Crowley [MVP] schrieb: Hi Ed, yes I am sure that nothing is blocked. Attachments work with OWAs from different Exchange servers using the same installation of IE. -- Kind regards, David Kluge |
SMTP Queues "hang" intermittently Posted: 05 May 2008 08:23 PM PDT I'm sorry to take so long to reply here. I tried a couple of times with an attachment but perhaps they are not allowed on the board. So I will try typing in the essence of the screen shot from Message Tracking. First though, to answer your question, of course I have the queues cleared now,and have been all day, but it seems to me that some were scheduled, some were queued, and some were retry if those statuses sound right. The following is the information from a screen shot from message tracking for one of the stuck the messages that was in one of the queues. They just seem to keep trying but nothing happens. From: Bruce Smith To: org Sent: 5/5/2008 1:29 PM 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP Store Driver: Message Submitted from Store 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Queuing 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advanced Queue 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Categorizer 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP: Message Categorized and Queued for Routing 5/5/2008 1:29 PM SMTP: Message Routed and Queued for Remote Delivery 5/5/2008 6:09 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Queuing 5/5/2008 6:09 PM SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advanced Queue 5/5/2008 6:09 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Categorizer 5/5/2008 6:09 PM SMTP: Message Categorized and Queued for Routing 5/5/2008 6:09 PM SMTP: Message Routed and Queued for Remote Delivery 5/5/2008 8:24 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Queuing 5/5/2008 8:24 PM SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advanced Queue 5/5/2008 8:24 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Categorizer 5/5/2008 8:24 PM SMTP: Message Categorized and Queued for Routing 5/5/2008 8:24 PM SMTP: Message Routed and Queued for Remote Delivery 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Advanced Queuing 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Started Message Submission to Advanced Queue 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Message Submitted to Categorizer 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Message Categorized and Queued for Routing 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Message Routed and Queued for Remote Delivery 5/5/2008 11:42 PM SMTP: Non-Delivered Report (NDR) Generated I believe that the NDR at the end might have been my doing because that is about the time I was working on things. But I had other messages in different queues that had just as long or longer message tracking entries just like this one. There was one however that had a rather strange last line. After the "Message Routed and Queued for Remote Deliver" entry, the next line was the standard "Started Outbound Transfer of Message", but the following line looked a bit corrupt: "Message transfered to *************2*******************........" rather than listing the mail server" If there is something that could be more useful let me know and I will post it. Tomorrow I hope I have time to look at the SMTP logs for those days although I haven't really got the jist of how to read everything in them. Again, thanks. "Cliff Galiher" <com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... |
Exchange 2007 and Office Communications Server 2007 on Same Machin Posted: 05 May 2008 02:54 PM PDT Hello, Thank you for your post. My name is Robbin Meng, and it is my pleasure to work with you on this issue! Please allow me to confirm that my understandings are correct. As I understand it, the issue is: You would like to know if you can install OCS 2007 on the same server with Exchange 2007 installed. If I have misunderstood your concerns please feel free to let me know. Since I am Exchange newsgroup technical engineer, I am not very familiar with OCS 2007 deployment, however, based on experience and research, I strongly do not recommend you to install OCS on Exchange server as the mediation server role from OCS 2007 cannot be on the same server because it uses those specific ports etc. Moreover, Exchange server 2007 is a sensitive server for system resource, otherwise it may possibly cause heavy workload or perforce issues and server no responding etc. potential problems. For more information, please check the below articles: Download the Office Communications Server 2007 Evaluation Guide http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/4/4/744b6734-561a-40a9-8d3d-67abf1c 9db06/OCS%20Evaluation%20Guide%20Launch%20FINAL.pdf Office Communications Server 2007 Doent: Supportability Guide(Software Infrastructure/Hardware Requirements for installing Office Communicator 2007) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=F8CC9B59-225F-425D- BD3A-E506396C6207&displaylang=en For your interest, I also found a similar instance: OCS 2007 Mediation server with Exchange 2007 SP1 on a windows 2003 X64 OS http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2881361&SiteID=17 If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your time and cooperation! Best regards, Robbin Meng(MSFT) Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ================================================== === This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner. You can locate the newsgroup here: http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader, please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner. For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated. ================================================== === This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. |
Exchange 2007 Resources and Outlook 2003 Posted: 05 May 2008 02:29 PM PDT Yes, OL2003 doesn't "get" that information. |
Posted: 05 May 2008 02:01 PM PDT So, what is the Web server and how is it configured for Kerberos? -- Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MS MVP - Security, MCSE -= F1 is the key =- * http://sl.mvps.org * http://msmvps.com/blogs/sp * "filip" <hr> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 05 May 2008 12:54 PM PDT Thank you for your quick reply. We are implementing CRM and I have not been brought in for much of the project except to provide the server support. Currently, our employees have very large Exchange mailboxes and I would like to begin implementing storage limits. However, I was told to wait since the impression was that once CRM is in place, e-mails linked to contacts in MS CRM will get taken out of the Exchange Information Store and stored within the CRM system. As the Network Administrator, I have concerns pertaining to the information store but the COO (former Director of Finance) has asked me to wait until CRM is in place. Is this assumption true? Thanks! "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |