Pages

Search

Recommended Spam/Virus Appliance - Microsoft Exchange

Recommended Spam/Virus Appliance - Microsoft Exchange

Recommended Spam/Virus Appliance

Posted: 10 Nov 2004 09:39 AM PST

Whoaaaa
Incoming POP mail? Mail doesn't come in via POP to an Exchange server,
it's converted from POP to SMTP and then thrown at the SMTP VSI on
Exchange, hence your issues are SMTP not POP.

As for which of your products are better, you'll never find anything
that will persuade a client with a hostile audience what's better,
they'll always aregue that black is white. Present, discuss and guide.
It's the best you can do.



On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:54:06 -0800, "tcummins"
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

exchange connector

Posted: 09 Nov 2004 09:11 AM PST

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:11:02 -0800, "CharlieY"
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

It would probably be a convenient thing to do, if you were planning on
upgrading the domain to AD, to bring the server into the domain as a
child in the existing tree.

If you are not planning on moving from 5.5 then you don't really need
the ADC because you can just manage the directory with Exchange Admin
rather than ADU&C.
If you are eventually looking at moving to E2K3 and/or do want to use
ADU&C to manage user properties then install and configure the E2K3
version of ADC.

Web Outlook is slow

Posted: 09 Nov 2004 07:23 AM PST

I did a tracert to the server. Everything appeared fast and normal.

this is very weird

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Move Exchange to an external harddrive

Posted: 09 Nov 2004 05:41 AM PST

Nnnnnoooooooooooo
No chance, USB 1.1 is nowhere near fast enough to run anything for
Exchange, logs or stores.

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 06:50:03 -0800, "Chuck"
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

OWA 2003 and multi-site federated nlb clusters

Posted: 08 Nov 2004 01:02 PM PST



"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:

 
[snip]
....
[snip] 

true. but i am asking in the context of wether anyone has done this with OWA
in particular since it is not just a basic flat web site.

 

i know, that's not what i'm asking.
 

because I have to geographically dispersed sites and I want failover for them,
how can I set up a 4 node nlb cluster across two subnets ?
 

maybe i wasn't being clear. I WANT to run only OWA. I have about 10,000
client
machines running Entourage and OWA2003 web clients and I want load balancing
and redundacny should the site fail -- without having to tell everyone, hey
switch to this other url, or having to change the DNS.
 

it usually isn't, I'm just curious because the Windows 2003 guide for
Geographically Dispersed clusters uses RR as the reference for the disjointed
NLB pairs. I know this will work from a flat site that doesn't need to track
state. knowing OWA needs to keep state, I'm wondering if there is some kind
of trick that can be used in this setup with regard to NLB.
 

Chain letter issues

Posted: 08 Nov 2004 06:50 AM PST

we do have a policy, but rather then enforcing the policy i have been told to
simply prevent anyone from doing it again. makes us look a little less like
nazi's.



"Andy David - Exchange MVP" wrote:
 

notification new mail

Posted: 07 Nov 2004 11:49 PM PST

thx
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> schreef in bericht
news:com... 

Duplicate mail messages in SBS2003

Posted: 05 Nov 2004 11:49 PM PST

Johan Strange wrote: 

Depends on how you're sending mail - it could be. But I think you'll get
more help in the SBS group - 

Services will not start

Posted: 05 Nov 2004 01:56 PM PST

Sorry! The Event ID is 7001.

"Henrik Walther [MVP]" wrote:
 

Webmail!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: 05 Nov 2004 05:43 AM PST

Yes it is possible
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/owa/

"Mike" wrote: