Pages

Search

new mailbox cannot receive messages from the internet - Microsoft Exchange

new mailbox cannot receive messages from the internet - Microsoft Exchange

new mailbox cannot receive messages from the internet

Posted: 15 Jan 2009 11:02 AM PST

When I create a new mailbox for a new or existing user, the mailbox
cannot receive messages from the internet (tried gmail, yahoomail).

Error message: 554 554 <(newmailboxaddress)>: Recipient address
rejected: Access
denied (state 14).

Internal email works fine. Can send to external addresses.

Is there something I need to do to enable the ability to receive
external email?

Offline database defrag

Posted: 14 Jan 2009 10:54 AM PST

It looks like you're missing some quotes there.

eseutil /d "f:\Storage Group 2 - fs\Mailbox Database 2" /t g:\temp_mailbox

This assumes that what's inside the quotes "f:\Storage Group 2 - fs\Mailbox
Database 2" is a valid path. I don't believe it is because there's no .edb
on it.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Mike W" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Undeliverable Meeting Requests

Posted: 14 Jan 2009 07:18 AM PST

Yes Erik is a legit user and is an internal user.

"Martin Blackstone [MVP]" wrote:
 

distributing incoming emails

Posted: 14 Jan 2009 02:08 AM PST

Thanks Lanwench :-)

I couldn't find a free one. Was going to suggest looking at CRM4 for the
Sales side of things.

Oliver

Write DACL inherit - How to remove

Posted: 13 Jan 2009 11:27 AM PST

We have only one domain so that clarified it. I was also not using the
Exchange Management Shell.
I received the following message after running the command:


Remove-ADPermission : Cannot remove ACE on object "DC=sagrescorp,DC=local" for
account "SAGRESNET\Exchange Servers" because it is not present.
At line:1 char:20
+ Remove-ADPermission <<<< "dc=sagrescorp,dc=local" -user
"sagrescorp.local\Ex
change Servers" -AccessRights WriteDACL -InheritedObjectType Group

Best Practices yzer still shows the old server on the list of servers
under "First Administrative Group" but it did not have the Write DACL Inherit
issue listed any more.



"Michael Dragone" wrote:
 

Outlook prompting for credentials after DC removed from Exchange S

Posted: 13 Jan 2009 05:58 AM PST

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:41:09 -0500, Andy David {MVP}
<com> wrote:
 


Oh and BTW, the credential prompting is probably related to:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927612

But that doesnt change the fact that running DCPROMO is not supported
on an Exchange Server. I still recommend calling support to ensure
things get fixed up correctly on that server.

Applying local holiday file on a user mailbox or resource.

Posted: 12 Jan 2009 11:49 PM PST

I suppose you could use Invoke-Item to run Outlook with the proper
switches...

"outlook.exe /hol <path>\outlook.hol"

John

"Anders Jensen" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Backing up an Exchange 2007 VM (VMware)

Posted: 12 Jan 2009 02:06 PM PST

Good Morning Martin

Yes, we have a SAN.

Sounds like I'm on the right track, I just wanted to see what others were
doing.

Cheers

Greg


"Martin Blackstone [MVP]" wrote:
 

Appointments Lost

Posted: 12 Jan 2009 10:20 AM PST

I wish this were true, but I have verified that the user is indeed sending
the appointment and it is not showing up on calendar. This is very
disturbing because people are missing meetings.

Any other thoughts or suggestions?

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Exchange Databse Recovery

Posted: 11 Jan 2009 09:27 AM PST

Once you repair the hardware, you may want to reconsider your storage. In
addition to a write penalty that's just plain too high, RAID 5 sets have
issues with rebuild. It used to be that you had a lot of small 9GBish disks
(the last of the breed that actually physically mapped 64 sectors per track)
in a RAID 5 set of say 8 or so members, and if one failed rebulding 9GB of
data wasn't too tough on the remaining drives. These days, people go out
and buy 3 1TB SATA disks a slap then in a RAID 5 set thinking it will solve
all their problems; it won't.

When a drive fails, and is rebuilt on a hot spare, you have to reconstruct
the data on the new drive from the data and parity stripes residing on the
surviving drives. Now all tree drives are going to be increadibly busy
reading the 2TB of surviving data and writing 1TB to the new drive. It's
not uncomon for second drive to fail on rebuild. It doesn't matter if it
was a hard error or a transient soft error on the second drive failure;
you're toast.

Add to the failure/rebuild woes the same old performance issues with RAID 5
when used for random small block workloads with a low read/write ratio.
Once you figure in the write penalty, a mirror will outperform a 4 drive
RAID 5 set. It gets worse when you ran out and bout those big slow SATA
drives because, well, the're slow; a third or a quarter of the IOPS for
random small block workloads that you would get from SCSI. SAS actually
performs a lot better. If I had a choice between SAS and SATA, I'd go for
SAS every time.

So what are those big slow SATA drives, and RAID 5 for that matter, good
for? Workloads that tend to be more sequential (full stroke) and are read
more often than they are written. UC Santa Cruz did a study on user home
directories in an Engineering company environment. Seems on average, 95% or
so of files written to a home directory was only read twice and one of those
times was almost immediately after it was written (user check to make sure
it's ther or Office application autosave behaviour - take your pick). Big
sequential files, rarely accessed, and read more than they are written. Now
there's a use for those 1TB SATA drives. I'd still go RAID 6 though to
address the second failure on rebuild issue.

John


"Miguel" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

I need to relay messages

Posted: 09 Jan 2009 03:46 PM PST

127.0.0.1 is the loopback address of any network card and therefore the
equivalent of the IP address of the server it is in, there would be no need
to allow this address to relay because messages generated by the server will
automatically be allowed..
James.
--
James Yeomans, BSc, MCSE
Ask me directly at: http://www.justaskjames.co.uk


"Javier" wrote:
 

How To Determine Which Exch03 SP2 Post SP Hotfixes are Installed

Posted: 08 Jan 2009 05:24 AM PST

You will be safe skipping the italicized lines. They do not apply to you.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Scott" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

OWA attachment issue

Posted: 07 Jan 2009 06:23 PM PST

This has been resolved. Thanks for the reply

"Lee Derbyshire [MVP]" wrote:
 

the message with restricted permissions cannot be viewed

Posted: 02 Jan 2009 12:54 PM PST

Hi Ed,

No they are not. The sender can resend the email and the reicipeint
receives it then.

Thanks,

Mark

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Multi-site Exchange CCR

Posted: 01 Jan 2009 05:57 PM PST


"Elissa" <com> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

One method is to use WNLB which is fully supported both for the CAS and HT
role. I've written a couple of articles on this subject. You cna find them
here:

http://www.mchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/planning-architecture/load-balancing-exchange-2007-sp1-hub-transport-servers-windows-network-load-balancing-technology-part1.html

http://www.mchange.org/articles_tutorials/exchange-server-2007/high-availability-recovery/load-balancing-exchange-2007-client-access-servers-windows-network-technology-part1.html

You can use WNLB since the E2K7 servers in both datacenters will belong to
the same AD site (requirement in a Geo-CCR scenario).

--
Henrik Walther
Exchange MVP | MCM: Exchange 2007
Mchange.org | Exchange-faq.dk