In WinXP i run 1024x768, but after loading FC6 my max is 800x600 - Forums Linux |
- In WinXP i run 1024x768, but after loading FC6 my max is 800x600
- install TFTP server question
- Xinerama + Radeon
- dringen Hilfe gebraucht
- Is Knoppix 4.0.2 compatible with SATA HDD's? Is the current version, 5.0.1?
- File manager?
- LABEL for swap partition.
- Switching HDs, preserving "bootability"
- How to install a Linux Kernel Source in Fedora Core 6?
- XP and Ubuntu bootloader issue
- File manager for Kubuntu?
In WinXP i run 1024x768, but after loading FC6 my max is 800x600 Posted: 04 Nov 2006 09:44 PM PST here are the relevant sections from xorg.conf: Section "Device" Identifier "Videocard0" Driver "i810" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection I am running Fedora Core 6. I am a linux newb. What else can i provide? Aioanei Rares wrote: |
Posted: 04 Nov 2006 02:47 PM PST Michael Heiming wrote: Or even easier: chkconfig tftp on service xinetd reload -- Regards, ToreS |
Posted: 04 Nov 2006 08:22 AM PST In comp.os.linux.setup colin353 <com>: Glad to hear! You didn't mentioned you had compiled your kernel on your own, and modified those settings, the option should be set to "m" per default in any distro kernel. [ TOFU removed ] -- Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94) mail: echo qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/' #bofh excuse 236: Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little traces |
Posted: 02 Nov 2006 12:03 PM PST christian gruber wrote: Hmm... DOS filesystem. Wird es auch als solches gemounted? -- "Careful with that VAX, Eugene!" |
Is Knoppix 4.0.2 compatible with SATA HDD's? Is the current version, 5.0.1? Posted: 01 Nov 2006 06:45 PM PST In article <home.invalid>, com (Bit Twister) writes: I had the same problem putting Slackware 10.2 on a new box. It would actually boot, but got a kernel panic soon afterwards when it failed to recognize the drive when it came time to actually mount things. I've seen mention of things like mkinitrd, but rather than try to figure it all out, I cheated - I dropped in a 4-gig IDE drive that I had lying around, and installed onto that. Once Slackware boots and gets itself organized, it figures out how to mount partitions on the SATA drive, where I keep a generous /usr/local and a huge /home. -- /~\ invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign! |
Posted: 01 Nov 2006 03:35 PM PST On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 04:00:09 +0000, Leo wrote: That gets you the root File Manager, not the user one. On my FC5 system the users file manager is not there, you have to launch konqueror and goto settings->load view file->file management. I have not found a way to lauch konqueror in file managemant mode from a "link to application" to set it myself on the desktop. -- Dancin' in the ruins tonight Tayo'y Mga Pinoy |
Posted: 01 Nov 2006 09:46 AM PST On 1 Nov 2006 09:46:54 -0800, com wrote: You can label it with the mkswap command: mkswap -L label /dev/hdxx see: man mkswap Mektub |
Switching HDs, preserving "bootability" Posted: 01 Nov 2006 08:57 AM PST On 1 Nov 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article <googlegroups.com>, Dan wrote: OK In theory, there is a performance hit by having separate partitions because everything can be dumped around one physical range of cylinders on a single partition, while the heads would have further to travel to reach the partition that has what you are reading/writing to. How important this might be depends solely on your system usage, and what you've got stashed on the disk. There is major benefit to having /home on a separate partition. Most people never back up (or even have the capability to back up) their disks and when they install a new distribution - /home is toast if it's on the same partition as the rest of the stuff. Here are two mini-howtos that should be on your system that discuss this and other concepts. The first is a bit dated. -rw-rw-r-- 1 gferg ldp 39240 May 3 2001 Install-Strategies -rw-rw-r-- 1 gferg ldp 68659 Jan 4 2006 Partition -rw-rw-r-- 1 gferg ldp 23639 Aug 21 2000 Hard-Disk-Upgrade Like Hector, I'm not using GRUB, but that's also got to be changed to point to the new locations, etc. FREE CLUE: Make sure you have a rescue capability - either a bootable CD (such as the rescue CD that comes with some distributions) or bootable floppy. "Bad stuff happens." Old guy |
How to install a Linux Kernel Source in Fedora Core 6? Posted: 01 Nov 2006 06:50 AM PST In comp.os.linux.setup com <com>: [ top posting fixed ] [..] Why would you? From the package description: Summary : Development package for building kernel modules to match the kernel. Description : This package provides kernel headers and makefiles sufficient to build modules against the kernel package. It contains what you asked for, needed kernel headers/makefiles to enable to build kernel modules, which is what you asked for. Unsure why you would expect something on the boot screen? Try 'rpm -qil <package-name>' to get information and a list of files, then go ahead and try building your modules, it should pick up the needed headers. You installed it with 'rpm -i ...' already. Good luck -- Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94) mail: echo qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/' #bofh excuse 402: Secretary sent chain letter to all 5000 employees. |
XP and Ubuntu bootloader issue Posted: 31 Oct 2006 04:58 PM PST On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:58:41 -0800, Andrew wrote: Personally, I think you're confused about a few things, so starting at the basics; You have two hard drives, sda, and sdb. If each drive has a single partition, the partitions will be sda1, and sdb1. Windows will happily install to a single primary partition, as it uses a swap file for memory swapping. Linux can do that too, but it is more common to have a swap partition in addition to the / partition. The swap partition can be either before, or after, the / partition. It helps to know the actual layout of your disks. From a Ubuntu terminal, the command "sudo fdisk -l" (lower case L) without the quotes, will show all the disk partitions. Grub normally installs in the MBR, by default, but it is possible to install it on any partition, if your plan is to chain-load from another boot loader. This is not the usual case with someone new to Linux, so until instructed otherwise, I'll assume that grub is actually installed in the MBR of sda. With Windows on sdb1, and with the BIOS set to boot from sda, you say you can boot Ubuntu, so do that. As root, edit your /boot/grub/menu.lst, by adding the following; title Windows rootnoverify (hd1,0) map (hd0) (hd1) map (hd1) (hd0) makeactive chainloader +1 This should give you a choice, in your grub start-up menu, between Ubuntu and Windows. Most likely, there is already an entry at the top of your menu.lst setting the default to Ubuntu, in the following form; default 0 timeout 15 The above sets the default to the first entry that starts with "title", and boots that entry after 15 seconds, if another selection is not made. It is common to have more than one entry for each Linux installation with titles like failsafe, or nofb, so if you wanted to set Windows as the default, and it was the fourth entry, you would set the default to 3. (grub always counts from 0) If the above does not work, come back and tell us what the actual results were. -- imotgm "Lost? Lost? I've never been lost... Been a tad confused for a month or two, but never lost." |
Posted: 31 Oct 2006 12:34 PM PST "***** charles" <com> writes: yes, dired emacs module regards, fg |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Linux To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |