Distribution groups not working - Microsoft Exchange |
- Distribution groups not working
- From field in OWA
- Corrupted public folder
- Additional Email Domain
- Public folder named Microsoft
- Updating of MS Intelligent Filtering
- fe be different administrative groups
- Mailboxes migration
- keep a security copy of all emails
- Faxing from Exchange??
- restricting RPC over HTTPS
- Mailbox full
- Sharing Calendars across Forests
- Groupwise 7 to exchange 2007
- OWA and spam messages
Distribution groups not working Posted: 12 Feb 2007 01:32 PM PST It would make sense if the group were null. Many times when I see this probem it is because the distibution group is not a universal group. The membership of universal groups is stored in the GC partition. For domain groups, the membership must be expanded by contacting a domain cotroller (designated expansion server) and is often problematic. If the expansion server cannot be contacted or is not designated, a null set is returned. Try converting the distribution groups to universal groups. As a side note, try this experiment: Create a distibution group with no members. Mail enable it and give it the smtapaddress of your choice (may I suggest com). Turn message tracking on and send a message to it. Does the output of the tracking logs look familiar? (If you every really want to send mail to the bitbucket, this is the way to do it) "Clayton Sutton" <com> wrote in message news:b25Ah.182649$news.easynews.com... |
Posted: 12 Feb 2007 11:46 AM PST Thanks for your answer but this is what a get: logonname [com].. How can I remove or change the logonname ?? // Kenneth "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> skrev i meddelandet news:%phx.gbl... |
Posted: 12 Feb 2007 01:54 AM PST In news:eqqaan$1jq$1$demon.co.uk, Smiley <com> typed: If you're doing a brick-level (aka mailbox level/folder level) backup, you should probably check with Symantec support. You also want to make sure you are doing such a backup*only* in conjunction with an *online* backup of the full Exchange stores, both public and private. Mailbox/brick-level backups and restores are often fraught with errors and are generally not recommended. |
Posted: 11 Feb 2007 10:51 AM PST Thank you, we have SBS 2003 and this worked, I haven't used Exchange since 2000 was released. -- Thanks, Douglas A. Maske Network Administrator Redux LLC http://www.drinkcocaine.com "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 10 Feb 2007 05:34 AM PST On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:01:11 +1100, "Gremlin" <mate> wrote: Good question on how your previous address as supplanted by the system folder, that certainly shouldn't have happened. Will try and search out what happened and why. |
Updating of MS Intelligent Filtering Posted: 08 Feb 2007 04:54 PM PST It uses Microsoft Update. You can turn off automatic updates and go to Microsoft Update manually in a web browser, or you can schedule Automatic Updates to be run at a certain time. Alternatively, Scott Roberts posted this script on the team blog that you can use to download IMF updates only. You can run the script as a scheduled task. http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/04/12/425060.aspx -- Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ---------------------------------------------- "Jer" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
fe be different administrative groups Posted: 08 Feb 2007 04:40 PM PST HI, The authentication box appear and don´t accept my password. FE can see the BE. Excuse me for my poor English. I´m Colombian (south America) thanks, bye "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 08 Feb 2007 12:50 PM PST Hi, It will take some time after the move before Outlook realizes that the mailbox has been moved - how long have you tried to wait? Leif "Steve Amiro" <com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
keep a security copy of all emails Posted: 07 Feb 2007 12:33 PM PST I would actually check what you are required to retain before looking at what you can use to retain whatever it is you need/want to retain. |
Posted: 07 Feb 2007 11:32 AM PST Thanks for the reply, it helps a lot. I'm looking at no more than say 100 per day if that. I think your latter suggestion may be the way to go. Thanks again. "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 07 Feb 2007 11:00 AM PST LOL, I'll give that a try thanks Paul "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 07 Feb 2007 01:15 AM PST Mark, We look after a large number of customers on different sites. Is it just me or is it that when people get these e-mails they just ignore it? Although I check the exchange like you said, some users have different limits on their mailbox. So it would be helpful to receive the e-mail as well. I hope this sort of explains the scenario but if it can't be done then fine. Many thanks, Luke "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Sharing Calendars across Forests Posted: 06 Feb 2007 08:48 AM PST Hi, You can replicate free/busy time between the forests: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=238573 Leif "Kevin" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 05 Feb 2007 01:18 AM PST Thanks for your reply, NDS will be removed within a year and we will be building a MS AD but I need info on doing the migration, or should I do a Migration to Exchange 2003 and then an upgrade to Exchange 2007? Thx, Lasangne> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: |
Posted: 04 Feb 2007 01:56 AM PST Sorry about the late reply.... been sick.... but thanx... will look into it :) Regards -AA_ |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |