Two Applications listening one serial port - Forums Linux |
- Two Applications listening one serial port
- Windows to Linux - HELP!
- usb sound cards + laptop?
- recommend wireless card for fedora core 3 (Dell Latitude C640)
- HEY NEWBIES...LET ME HELP...
- Debian Sarge: Intermittent random crashes
- Where are the config files for the VNC server ?
- Linux 2.4.x - reduce size of /lib libraries in ramdisk
- httpd config issue with documentroot
Two Applications listening one serial port Posted: 01 Feb 2006 09:42 AM PST Becouse it is a server with only a serial port. And....signal splitter... Where do i find it? En com del 1/2/06 19:10, "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <net> escribió: |
Posted: 31 Jan 2006 08:25 PM PST For some applications it is easy to switch. There are applications for which Linux is more complete and works better than Windows. For some applications it is a bit more difficult, you either must force yourself to adjust the way you work to be effective in the idiom of unix, sometimes you must be willing to use bleeding-edge software, and sometimes you must accept that there are situations where Linux simply will not work, such as in the case of incompatable hardware where the manufacturer does not want linux support to exist, or in cases where the application you want to run is tightly bound to a particular OS, won't run under emulation, and has no alternative. Winmodem is one of those cases where you might not be able to solve the problem at all. There are drivers for some modems, but for many, there's no support at all, not even experimental support. AMR 'modems' are the worst. They aren't modems at all, rather, they are an accessory to some sound device that has a switching capability so that it can be used on a phone line. Even worse than the DSP-based windmodems, these aren't even related to modem devices. And the software support does not exist. I don't know exactly what hardware you have. Have you tried a 5.10 Ubuntu? or a late version of Knoppix? Those distros do a pretty good job of detecting hardware, and I personally find Ubuntu to be the overall best distribution ever for general purpose usage. I use linux because I prefer it. For my applications, the platform has superior features and performance to Windows. But I still have not 100% migrated (and I've been running linux since 0.99pl1). I have no real alternative to ASIO-based digital audio/VST hosts, although some of the experimental stuff coming out is fairly promising. The only other issues have to do with certain types of media. For example I have yet to see a linux-based DVD player that's any good, and even the bad ones are so difficult to deal with that I don't bother. And there are some applications that I run under VMWare, having no alternatives. On that subject, I'm happy to report that the applications I run under VMWare actually run better than the same applications on the same machine natively under Windows. I have not come to any conclusions about why this is, but it's true, and I was quite surprised. I've digressed from your specific topic, and I apologize. But the idea of a user who is very experienced in both Windows and Linux, and experienced in computer organization in general, is very interesting to me. None of these systems have any real mystery to me -- I've developed applications and system level software on all these platforms, and I'm decades into my career. So that's where my perspective on migrating comes from. |
Posted: 31 Jan 2006 11:34 AM PST Nicholas DePetrillo <org> writes: Unfortunately the ALSA and the manufacturer idea of standard compliant can be different. The manufacturers seem to think that "We can make it run on Windows" is equivalent to "standards compliant". Also for some they require a firmware upload. So once the firmware is uploaded the card will run fine, uploading the firmware can sometimes be a chore (it used to be on 2.4 kernels and early 2.6 that the usb bus drivers had a bug making it very difficult to upload firmware, The bus would crash if it was reset. I think this is now solved. But it indicates that "standards compliant" may not be the whole story) |
recommend wireless card for fedora core 3 (Dell Latitude C640) Posted: 30 Jan 2006 09:23 PM PST tell me the truth! "F. Baker" <mit.edu> ???? news:43def44e$0$568$mit.edu... |
Posted: 30 Jan 2006 04:18 PM PST > Not smart enough to be Peter. He doesn't know that you invoke ghod to avoid Are you still here? I told you once, GET THE FUCK OFF MY SCREEN. And "ghod" isnt a word. Go fucking look it up, you tool. |
Debian Sarge: Intermittent random crashes Posted: 30 Jan 2006 06:45 AM PST com wrote: Is it compatible with your hypothesis that on the SAME machine Windows XP works *smoothly* whilst Debian Sarge keeps *crashing*? Do you know if there's a document on the web that reports (almost) ALL the possible causes of such intermittent crashes on Linux? The situation seems extremely complicated in order to isolate the source of this bad behaviour... About "power supply swapping": I'm not an electrician: could you explain me what you intend with that expression, please? Many thanks! |
Where are the config files for the VNC server ? Posted: 30 Jan 2006 03:17 AM PST "Kam Oe" <com> wrote in message news:googlegroups.com... Sorry, I lost track. Take a good look at that init script's contents: I suspect you need to set the VNCSERVERS to be associated with a specific X session and username, so that the session is associated with that user, but I can't test it from here right now. |
Linux 2.4.x - reduce size of /lib libraries in ramdisk Posted: 29 Jan 2006 04:16 PM PST com wrote: Ad 1: man strip Ad 2: What is xconfig? About dietlibc: Search for it with your favourite search engine. dietlibc comes with a script that compiles and links the C files properly. You have to adjust the Makefile to use that. Maybe you can get away with setting the CC environment variable for make. Ad 3: Again, a web search will lead you to it. Yours, Laurenz Albe |
httpd config issue with documentroot Posted: 29 Jan 2006 03:23 PM PST In message <net> "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" <net> wrote: First - I'm not a webserver expert. However, I do remember finding in one of the config files a list of the files which can be offered if a bare directory it given in the URL - so when the browser sends www.bbc.co.uk the server adds / and then any of index.htm, index.html and anything else you care to put in this list, that it can find in the directory at the root of the site. It strikes me that if a stray / has crept into the list, or possibly if the list is empty, then you could see the above behaviour being a possible result. As I said, I'm no expert, but I'd look at the config files very carefully. -- Alan Adams, from Northamptonshire freeserve.co.uk http://www.nckc.org.uk/ |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Linux To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |