Pages

Search

Importing\Exporting MS Exchange 2003 Custom Recipients - Microsoft Exchange

Importing\Exporting MS Exchange 2003 Custom Recipients - Microsoft Exchange

Importing\Exporting MS Exchange 2003 Custom Recipients

Posted: 10 Aug 2005 11:49 AM PDT

Todd,
Thank you for your suggestion. I was able to figure out why the contacts
were not importing as lastname, firstname in the title and the e-mail address
was not displayed in the e-mail address field when I imported them. For some
reason when I exported to .csv the lastname was in a row entitled name, the
firstname was in a row entitled e-mail address and the e-mail address was in
a row entitled display name. When I imported the .csv into my Outlook
contacts I needed to select Map Custom Fields and manually tell it where each
part of the contact should go. Then I was fine.

Cheyenne

"Todd Hawkins" wrote:
 

Posts in Public Folders, rather than emails?

Posted: 10 Aug 2005 02:31 AM PDT

Hi

This KB should help you out:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=817809

--
Mark Fugatt
Microsoft Limited

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"hinarei" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange SPAM filter

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 10:22 PM PDT

We use NetIQ's product, "Mail Marshal". It sits in as your public SMTP
gateway, and filters your spam before it ever touches your exchange server.
It's very configurable to your specific needs. One of the places I've seen it
helps us immensely is filtering "bad addresses"... ie: addresses that don't
exist in your org. It's amazing to look at the log and see message to
com, com com, com, etc.... it's amazing
how much of this junk your server has to face if you don't filter it early on.

Great product!

"Matty" wrote:
 

Redundant DNS MX record

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 09:33 PM PDT

There are two ways of load-balancing mail between two mail servers. The
first way is the one you have in mind...two MX records with the same
priority. While researching this recently, I found info that said some mail
servers (such as sendmail) as part of their code will split mail traffic
between two MX records of equal priority when sending mail. For the record,
I don't know what a sending Exchange server does with MX records of equal
priority.
The other way is to have one MX record but two A records for the same FQDN
that point to different IPs. I'd personally go with the two MX records.
As for your last question, the only thing a sending mail server knows is the
MX record for a particular domain. It doesn't know "which mailbox server
the message is going to". If you have mail for the same domain name split
across two different mail servers, sending mail servers have no way of
knowing which addresses are on one or the other. The mail will go to one or
the other based on the MX record lookup and Exchange will have to route it
to the correct server.

todd

"Jon Doe" <net> wrote in message
news:com... 
records 
on 
that 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2000/maintain/13x2kadb.mspx 
currently 
enable 

Block spam bouncing

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 07:26 PM PDT

Thanks, I'll pass this on to our firewall guy.

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Backing up MSS.Log in Exchange

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 07:16 AM PDT

Cheers Mark.

What does the file actually contain if it is constantly locked or is this
not a normal state?

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Update Rollup for Exchange 5.5 (KB841765

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 06:13 AM PDT

Remove online. from my Microsoft address.

--
Mark Fugatt
Microsoft Limited

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Paul Digby" <co.uk> wrote in message
news:ddgbpe$k8k$1$demon.co.uk... 

"Rule can't be saved message" in OWA

Posted: 09 Aug 2005 04:48 AM PDT

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: 

Well, I've done some more testing since my initial posting, and found
that this is only affecting rules when I try to use the "forward" option
(which is what I was trying to do when I found the problem).

If I set up a rule in OWA and and choose "Forward it to", I get the "Rule
can't be saved" when trying to save it. If I choose to Move/Copy to a folder
or Delete it, it saves just fine.

This happens to everyone, including myself, who is a Domain Admin and has full
access to Exchange. It doesn't matter if you have a few existing rules or if
you have NO rules, you can't save if you choose "Forward to" as the action.

But, I can save a "Forward to" rule just fine using Outlook 2003.

Thanks for the reply.

Moving SBS Exchange 2003 Databases and Logs

Posted: 08 Aug 2005 03:52 PM PDT

OK got it thanks
--
Regards
Cass Shelver
Truth Chemical
281-292-6900
com


"Andy David - Exchange MVP" wrote:
 

GAL Phones/Notes "Toll Free" field.

Posted: 08 Aug 2005 02:15 PM PDT

OK - just in case anyone else has a similar issue:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;285887

the GAL will only show single-value LDAP attributes by default - the latest
exchange service pack has to be installed, and you have to use the /forestprep
switch on the service pack to fix the GAL, and then choose the templates
that you want to revert to - which will blow away any customizations that
you have done, and then redo the customizations. This *should* make things
work - but this seems to be the answer.

--Ian
 

Email Archive Software

Posted: 08 Aug 2005 02:08 PM PDT

Anyone using GFIMailArchiver for Exchange?


Thanks,
Fred


"Fred Yarbrough" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
maintain 

Cannot deliver email to one to domain

Posted: 08 Aug 2005 07:02 AM PDT

Just to confirm that port 587 has nothing to do with "normal" mail
delivery. The only thing required is SMTP on port 25.

If they do receive an email from time to time - then it is most likely
that they have some spam filter like IMF and for one reson or another
it is triggering the false positives.
It could be something in your user's signature that IMF at the remote
site does not like.


There is actually little you can do to fix tis except get back in
contact with the IT guy there and try to figure it out.
If it wasn't working at all - you would expect either an NDR or you
could think that you somehow got onto some of the infamous IP blacklist
servers. Since it is intermittent - it is most likelt the spam filter
on the other side.

Hope this gives you a starting point,

___________________________
Nebojsa Djogo,
VP, Software Development,
Digiportal Software
www.digiportal.com
_________________________________________
Spam now accounts for 75% of all emails.
Protect your server and your users with ChoiceMail

Exchange 2003 storage limit issue

Posted: 05 Aug 2005 03:23 PM PDT



In news:googlegroups.com,
student <com> typed: 

True, dat. 

Try it...
 

Yes, it is indeed supposed to do that. Are the users even seeing their
warnings, etc?