Pages

Search

uninstalling exchange server problem - Microsoft Exchange

uninstalling exchange server problem - Microsoft Exchange

uninstalling exchange server problem

Posted: 05 May 2005 08:40 AM PDT

nope i dont use public folders ...

"seth" <com> wrote in message
news:#phx.gbl... 

Exchange Virutal Memory

Posted: 05 May 2005 08:31 AM PDT

Thanks for your help guys.


"Cody" <none> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... 

Moving Exchange 2003 To Another Server When Installed on a Win2k3

Posted: 05 May 2005 06:08 AM PDT

Mark,

Thank you for the reply. The new server can just be a member server,
correct? It does not need to be a DC?

I'm just making sure because I found this kb article that says you can't
promote or demote a server after installing Exchange 2003, but it makes no
mention of moving it to a new server....

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822179

Also, the instructions that you pointed out to me on swinc are great, but
they specify Exchange 2000, will they work correctly for 2003?

Once again, thank you for your help!!

OWA- Quick Dummy Question

Posted: 04 May 2005 07:11 PM PDT

Got this from another board, it worked great:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=883380

Back to the redirection-

Internally we use the https:\\<servername>\exchange to access the OWA. We
have SSL & forms based turned on and working. The router is configured to
forward the https:\\mail.FQDN.com to the exchange server. The server see's
the request but doesn't know what to do because the is not a reference to the
'exchange' page. I believe I need either a index page in there somewhere or
a redirection of some kind.

Thanks
--
Pete C.


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Cached Mode - Not receiving e-mail.

Posted: 04 May 2005 08:18 AM PDT

Well I really don't care either way BUT my boss does. Cache mode is not
needed on the comuter that is having the problem. On the other hand two of
the other computers using Excamge 2003 are laptops. They belong to my boss
and me. We use these laptops from home and use VPN to access the network.
Cache mode is the best way to access all we need on and off the network. Well
as far as we know it is.

"J.H" wrote:
 

Message size decrease?!

Posted: 04 May 2005 04:56 AM PDT

Guess - you got that message from the Internet. Internet mail uses less
efficient method of attachment transport and storage. This format is used in
Exchange when message first arrives. Later, when message is accessed by MAPI
client (Outlook in Exchange Server mode), it is converted to more efficient
storage format and thus takes less space. Thus decrease in size.

David wrote:
 

Exchange 2003 and greylisting

Posted: 04 May 2005 01:55 AM PDT

Hi Ola,

Have you tried Real-time block list in Exchange server, which I think would meet
your requirements.
823866 How to configure connection filtering to use Realtime Block Lists (RBLs)
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=823866

For the DNS-based spam database, we can refer to:
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97

For other third-party solutions, we could wait for some experience sharing from
the peers ;-)

Regards,

Pat Cai
Microsoft Online Partner Support

Mailbox Rights -- Outlook Delegates????

Posted: 03 May 2005 06:25 AM PDT

One thing to keep in mind, I noticed it when we converted our users to
exchange 2000. When you used to give delegate access in 5.5, users could add
the profile to their services in outlook and open the mailbox and see the
folders they have access to. In E2K, this does not work the same way. If
you give a user Editor access to your inbox, they see your inbox (file open
other users folder) but if they add your profile their outlook, they will not
be able to expand the mailbox anymore. This has changed from E 5.5 to E2K.
Just an observation in our company.
Clients now have to give at least reviewer on the Outlook Today.
THanks.

Message Receipient

Posted: 02 May 2005 05:30 PM PDT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for the reply..

Could you explain what you mean by Forwarder ? I'm not familiar with
this option.

Thanks,

HS

Mark Arnold [MVP] wrote:
| On Tue, 03 May 2005 00:30:59 GMT, HbooGz <com>
| wrote:
|
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Good Afternoon:
|>
|>Considering Exchange's tight integration with AD, i figure i post in as
|>many relevant groups.
|>
|>I had two user's within the same OU until i disabled one user. Now the
|>scenario is as follows:
|>
|>Disabled user = User A
|>Other user in same OU ( recipient of meeting request) = User B
|>User sending Meeting Request = User C
|>
|>User C sends a meeting request to User B ; User B receives the request
|>normally, However User C receives a message from System Administrator
|>indicating "the e-mail account (UserA in this example) does not exist at
|>the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or
|>contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address.
|>
|>User A was first disabled and through the troubleshooting process the
|>user account and mailbox were purged.
|>
|>User B is running Outlook 2003 but not running in Caching Mode nor does
|>he have anyone set as a delegate.
|>
|>Environment Consists of:
|>
|>Windows 2000 Server;SP 4 = AD
|>Windows 2000 Server;SP4 w/Exchange 2003;SP1
|>
|>Does anyone have any helpful advice on how to resolve this ?
|>
|>Thanks
|
|
| Did you also check to see if there was any forwarder on B, either at
| the server in AD or within Outlook, that sent mail to A?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCeBcj9u9mmh2EXgQRAlcBAJ0f8IXY+hIELorrftCmha wcob9SqwCfaCvH
iCjqAgU+lQDiHIBHRLxqM5Y=
=u38C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

IIS SMTP Virtual Server sending to Exchange 2003

Posted: 02 May 2005 09:41 AM PDT

Here is some more information about my problem. I eventually get a Action:
delayed Status: 4.4.7 on the outgoing message. The SMTPSVC log looks like
this:

20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 EHLO - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 EHLO - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 MAIL - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 MAIL - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 RCPT - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 RCPT - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 BDAT - 0
20:43:36 192.168.1.209 BDAT - 0
20:54:18 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:54:18 192.168.1.209 - - 0
20:54:18 192.168.1.209 QUIT - 0
20:54:18 192.168.1.209 QUIT - 0

Help!! What does this mean?

Thanks,
Ken K

"Ken Korczynski" wrote:
 

CFO died.

Posted: 01 May 2005 08:08 PM PDT

On Sun, 1 May 2005 22:31:04 -0700, "MichaelHensley"
<postalias> wrote:
 
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=429163ec-dcdf-47dc-96da-1c12d67327d5&DisplayLang=en

How to clear Outlook 2003 history

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 08:26 AM PDT

Now who is being disengenuous? Many of you MVP's weasel your way into
corporate pockets by directing inquirer's to web sites for help. And of
course these web sites that SELL SOLUTIONS and consulting jobs, don't they?

You write about profit like it's a four letter word! We are very honest
about writing a needed solution for profit. Instead of telling people to
delete oftentimes valuable, irresplacable data, we developed a very helpful
solution. This solution even includes a means by which users can edit x500
addresses, very handy when migrating Exchange servers. But then, you seem
like the type of person who hates Bill Gates and Benjamin Franklin and
perhaps anyone else who developed products that help people.

The many companies and government agencies all over this globe that have
written to say "thanks" to us are testimony that we developed a much needed
solution. We will not "go away", and we will continue to call attention to
"dumb advice" given by people who should know better. For your information,
$24.95 is only for the desktop version that doesn't edit GAL records. You
should see what our executable version can do when called from a login
script!

These comments do not apply to ALL MVP's, just a few. Most MVP's that I
have been in touch with are genuine and work very hard to help people.
Others....well it's not a perfect world.

Randy
"Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]"
<org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

LDAP

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 03:56 AM PDT

Hi
The only hitch here is we only want CR to be hidden which are created for
external addresses,is there a way out for this so end user can't see all the
CR..

Urgent help will be appreciated...

Thanks&Regards
Rajnish

"Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" wrote: