How to make multiple department scurity step by step in project server 2002 Microsoft Project |
- How to make multiple department scurity step by step in project server 2002
- Analysis Toolbar
- Reports Menu from "Command buttons"?
- Task filters - criteria
- Project 2002 vs 2003 Comparisons
- Calendar - Standard vs. 6.5 hour
- Observation about leveling and summary tasks with resource assignments
- Benefits of one project per file
- gbui ??????
- Server
- Help Date formula for Flag field
- Tracking Gantt - Compare to Interim Values?
- Reports to Word
- Col Moves
- The best way to schedule non-dependant tasks
- Working with Shifts
- Project Standard 2003 Evaluation Download
- How do I create a customized task ID that maintains consecutive number for filte
- opening project from database is VERY slow
- Turn off scheduling messages
- Proj view in Word
- How much difference between Project 2002 and 2003?
- Project & Outlook Integration
- Microsoft Project and Web Access
- Printing breaks
How to make multiple department scurity step by step in project server 2002 Posted: 13 Apr 2004 09:48 PM PDT Jumadi -- I am assuming that project managers in Department A need to be able to see all of the Department A projects, and that Department B project managers need to be able to see all of the Department B projects. If this is the case, then your Project Server administrator will need to do the following in order to make this scenario work properly: 1. Remove the project managers in both departments from the Project Managers group 2. Create two new Categories called something like "DeptA Projects" and "DeptB Projects" and manually select the projects viewable in each Category (there is no automatic way to make this happen) 3. Create two new Groups called something like "DeptA Managers" and "DeptB Managers" and add the project managers to their respective Group 4. Add the "DeptA Projects" category to the "DeptA Managers" group and add the add the "DeptB Projects" category to the "DeptB Managers" group 5. Each time a new project is added to the Project Server database, you will need to manually add the project in either the ProjectA Projects or ProjectB Projects category Hope this helps. -- Dale A. Howard [MVP] Enterprise Project Trainer/Consultant Denver, Colorado http://www.msprojectexperts.com "We wrote the book on Project Server" "Jumadi" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:196a601c421db$baf30660$gbl... |
Posted: 13 Apr 2004 05:02 PM PDT Thanks for this. it |
Reports Menu from "Command buttons"? Posted: 13 Apr 2004 01:58 PM PDT Hello John, Yes this can be done. My work around is quiet lengthy so Please email me direct. Cheryl |
Posted: 13 Apr 2004 01:54 PM PDT -- Jan De Messemaeker Microsoft Project Most Valuable Professional Project Management Consultancy Prom+ade BVBA 32-495-300 620 "John Castle" <microsoft.com> schreef in bericht news:1c0b701c42199$82a8ccf0$gbl... |
Project 2002 vs 2003 Comparisons Posted: 13 Apr 2004 01:16 PM PDT Hi ... Came across this document ... seems to fit the bill ... www.projectgroup.com/Shared%20Documents/ Downloads/Demos/Whatsnew.doc - Cheers Regards Johnkat MSP 2002 Pro and 2003 Pro! Anyone have any clue if such a document exists? Microsoft's web sites are really getting clugged up with all kinds of useless information! |
Calendar - Standard vs. 6.5 hour Posted: 13 Apr 2004 11:06 AM PDT I think the Project Calendar should reflext the work schedule of a generic "typical" resource so in your case I'd go along with the notion that the 6.5 hour calendar should be used. You did remember to take into account lunches, etc as non working time didn't you? Also, set the days per week and hours per day in the Options Calendar page to agree with the Project Calendar -- Steve House [MVP] MS Project Trainer/Consultant Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs "JAckie" <com> wrote in message news:1933701c42182$04d157f0$gbl... |
Observation about leveling and summary tasks with resource assignments Posted: 13 Apr 2004 08:44 AM PDT well observed but this is not really any sort of revelation. while you are at it, don't bother to link the summaries either. no links, no resources, simple life. "Aren Cambre" <smu.edu> wrote in message news:google.com... |
Benefits of one project per file Posted: 12 Apr 2004 02:16 PM PDT Well, as I said, it's just my opinion/view ... not hard and fast rules .... I'll elaborate: 1. File Size: when files get too big, hard to email and handle, take longer to open and close and (heaven forbid) when they get corrupted or otherwise fail less is lost that requires fixing (backups essential). 2. File Complexity: too much data (tasks) in a project file make it hard for user to use, especially when unconnected/unrelated information is clogging up things. Smaller files helps with people who are reluctant or don't want to use Project (for whatever reason) by keeping the data need focused on things they *do* or *should* care about (given their project responsibilities). 3. Organsiation: splitting up files to match the organisation allows me to "divvy-up" the project files in line with how the work is allocated. People can work on their own piece of the project without interfering other pieces, either on line via the network, or remotely and collaborate by exchanging project files via email. Re "with one project in one file, can I do things with it that I can't do when there are multiple files" ... can't think of anything really since even with many individual files, you can put them any or all of them into a master file and from that perspective they are one and the same. No matter whether you have fewer big files, or more smaller files, you still have to watch versioning and insure old files don't over-write new files (if that how you are exchanging). A process or method to check in/out files helps a lot. Hope this is useful to you. Let us know. rms Conrad Santiago wrote: |
Posted: 12 Apr 2004 02:06 PM PDT Project 2002 & 2003 views, tables and charts are actually web components inside Internet Explorer inside Project... convoluted, but true. This means that in order for Project to display the "plain old" gantt chart for instance, the web page for setting this up must be loaded in the web browser inside Project. This page is found inside a dll normally installed in the path <C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Microsoft Office Project 11\1033\PJINTL.DLL> (on my machine, running Pj2003.) This page is accessed using the "gbui://mainpage.htm" setting found under Tools/Options/Interface and the Project Guide settings. Actually, the default is "gbui://mainpage.htm" but you could use your own page - check out the MSDN pages for rolling your own Project Guides - especially the Project2002 dev. pages. If you're having "gbui" trouble, try copying a known-to-be-working version of the PJINTL.DLL from another computer/CD to your machine. -- /Lars Hammarberg www.camako.se MSProject Premier Partner "KH" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:16fe601c420d2$03c43db0$gbl... |
Posted: 12 Apr 2004 12:09 PM PDT Jorge: No, the collaborative features (issues, risks, and documents) are available through project server only. Just an fyi, the risks feature doesn't search for or identify risks analytically; instead, it allows you to notify project members of a risk. Hope this helps! ---------------------- Sean Pales EPM Solutions Group Bennett Adelson www.bennettadelson.com only |
Help Date formula for Flag field Posted: 12 Apr 2004 11:24 AM PDT Glad I could help. Good luck with it! -Jack "Steve" <com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... picture difference flag1 |
Tracking Gantt - Compare to Interim Values? Posted: 11 Apr 2004 02:00 PM PDT Hello John, Yes, you can. Display the Tracking Gantt, then : Format / Bar Styles... Go down so that you find the "Baseline" grey bar. You can change the From Baseline Start To : Baseline Finish by From Baseline Start1 (or x) To Baseline Finish1(or x). Hope this helps, Gérard Ducouret "John Castle" <microsoft.com> a écrit dans le message de news:1b19001c42008$15499eb0$gbl... |
Posted: 11 Apr 2004 01:59 PM PDT But not "reports" AFAIK. Hope this is useful to you. Let us know. rms Donna wrote: |
Posted: 11 Apr 2004 01:58 PM PDT I don't have P2000 installed any more. In P2003 you can do that in both task and resource views. On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:58:39 -0700, John Castle <microsoft.com> wrote: -- |
The best way to schedule non-dependant tasks Posted: 11 Apr 2004 10:56 AM PDT Hi, This is fortunately absolutely unnecessary. Even with the option "from start" Project calculates Latest start and finish dates. You just have to insert them as a column to make them visible. HTH -- Jan De Messemaeker Microsoft Project Most Valuable Professional Project Management Consultancy Prom+ade BVBA 32-495-300 620 "David" <microsoft.com> schreef in bericht news:com... can start each task and finish as early as possible. One way to to this is to schedule the project task from the finish date. Go to Project, Project Information, Schedule from:. drop down: Project Finish Date. Now just enter your tasks along with the duration. Project will determine Finish Date from the longest task duration and adjust the other task dates to start as late as possible. |
Posted: 09 Apr 2004 04:56 PM PDT You're on the right track with your first approach but IMHO went wrong with a fundamental error regarding the nature of a task in a project plan. A task is a discrete, measurable package of physical work that has a definite observable start and ending time. It's duration is the actual amount of time between when it starts and ends. Where I think you (and many others, you're not alone) went wrong is you used "duration" to mean the limits between when it *could* take place and not a prediction of when it *will* take place. If I have a task that will take one day of work that must be done sometime between Monday and Friday of next week, it is a one-day duration task with a Friday deadline, NOT a 5-day task with a MFNLT constraint of Friday. You went on to say you did this because you didn't know which shift would be available to do it. The problem with that is the function of the project manager is to *designate* when it will be done - you look at when the predecessor task will be done, let's say it finishes at 2pm Tuesday and thus the task in question can start anytime after that. You go to the swing shift foreman and tell him to assign someone to the task Tuesday evening. Note he doesn't tell you when he's scheduled someone, you tell him when he needs to schedule them. So in your example, your task is 6 hours duration and has one resource assigned 100% (NOT 300%, that screws up your work estimates and budget by showing the task requiring and costing 18 man-hours work when it should only be 6). If that resource is a day shift worker the task will be scheduled duration the day. If that works well from the project objectives, fine. If the predecessor finished at 2pm the previous day and you need the task in question really to begin asap, then assign it to a swing resource instead and it will move up closer to when the predecessor ended. Then you go to the foreman/manager, whoever is the person that has the functional authority over the workers and tell them they need to assign a worker to do the work starting at such and such a time from whichever shift that you've decided is best for the project schedule. -- Steve House [MVP] MS Project Trainer/Consultant Visit http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs "mmaxwell" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... too...actually I logged on to see if any new posts have been added on the subject. (resources) to a task MS Project requires that ALL resources work on that task. For instance, I assigned 3 shifts (24 man hours) to a task that only required 6 man hours to complete. I wanted all 3 shifts to be "available" to work because I wasn't sure which one would actually do the work when it was time. What I have observed, and would like a solution too is this, Project assigned each shift 1/3 of the work...or 2 hours. 1st shift worked on the task from 8-10 am then did nothing. 2nd shift worked from 4-6 pm and then did nothing. 3rd shift worked from midnight to 2 am then did nothing. A task that should have taken 3/4 of a single shift had a duration of one full day. resource to the task. I used the resource "Tech" and assigned him at 300% (or 3 people) and left the working hours set at the default. It is NOT perfect but it is a close approximation. If anyone else has any idea how to accurately handle resources that work shifts, please let us know. |
Project Standard 2003 Evaluation Download Posted: 09 Apr 2004 01:07 PM PDT a |
How do I create a customized task ID that maintains consecutive number for filte Posted: 09 Apr 2004 12:04 PM PDT Hung, To do that you will have to use a spare field (e.g. Number1) and fill in the numbers after the filter is applied. John |
opening project from database is VERY slow Posted: 09 Apr 2004 06:00 AM PDT When I open the database with Access, it opens normally (a few seconds). The problems actually appears only with Project. Rob Schneider <net.net> wrote in message news:<phx.gbl>... |
Posted: 09 Apr 2004 05:26 AM PDT So you did this and it still isn't working? Is it the planning wizard that's giving you problems? You can turn off the planning wizard by going Tools, Options, General tab. Clear the planning wizard check boxes. Hope this helps! If not, please repost. --------------------------- Sean Pales EPM Solutions Group Bennett Adelson www.bennettadelson.com boxes. to my duration cell whenever I increase the duration on a task that has a resource. It asks me the same questions every time and I don't need it. slowing down the opening of my MSWord 2003, waiting on some macro to open. How do I disable this? |
Posted: 08 Apr 2004 08:46 PM PDT Len: If you're using Project '03, use the Copy Picture to Office Wizard button on the Analysis toolbar. Just a thought! Good Luck! --------------------------- Sean Pales EPM Solutions Group Bennett Adelson www.bennettadelson.com Word? I require high level summary reports in my document, and would prefer to Clipboard&Paste, but am prepared to print to file if required. A linked OLE would of course be the bees knees. |
How much difference between Project 2002 and 2003? Posted: 08 Apr 2004 04:21 PM PDT If you are going from Proj2002 Standard to Proj2003 Standard you will find very little difference. The list below shows this (and one could argue that the export timephased data is not a new feature) Personally even though I could upgrade easily (my company has a license for both) I'm still using 2002. Proj2003 Standard has some bugs (most notably a problem with indentation) so you will need to install a hotfix for it as well. -Jack "Sean" <com> wrote in message news:1a74f01c41e37$42173bf0$gbl... |
Posted: 08 Apr 2004 02:06 PM PDT Sean - I have had issues integrating project 2000 with outlook 2002. Project team members have run WGsetup.exe and receive task assignments I have initiated in project via teamassign. However, the MS project help states the following "Double-click a TeamAssign message to open it. When you accept the assignment and reply to the message, the task is added to your task list in Microsoft Outlook." The task is not being added to users outlook tasks. Any suggestions? |
Microsoft Project and Web Access Posted: 08 Apr 2004 12:27 PM PDT I GOT IT WORKING FINALLY... thanks for all your help still i prohibiting all |
Posted: 08 Apr 2004 06:41 AM PDT You're welcome, Brian :-) Mike Glen MS Project MVP "Brian" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Project To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |