Pages

Search

Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2007 Send-as permission takes long time to accept

Posted: 01 Sep 2008 10:58 PM PDT

Thank's Massimo. This registry settings really do the trick.
Regards,Miha
"Massimo" <it> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

How can one tell if Exchange has been installed in a forest?

Posted: 01 Sep 2008 02:08 PM PDT

For the group's benefit (you all have been so good to me), I took a look at
the AD Schema BEFORE and AFTER an Exchange forest prep. BEFORE forestprep,
there was only ONE mch* entry in the Schema. Afterwards, there was an
*explosion* in number of mch* entries. It went from 1 to 114! And that
was just for forestprep!

If you remove the Exchange server from the domain and re-add it, will you encounter any major problems?

Posted: 01 Sep 2008 11:41 AM PDT

Bring it back online.

Single user can log on to OWA, Outlook fails - Urgent help please

Posted: 31 Aug 2008 04:59 PM PDT

Yes it does resolve...

I posted this earlier, but the post seems to have failed.

-
I think I found a solution here in Experts Exchange (you need to be a
subscriber).
Basically I fixed it by logging on as client and changing the Outlook
Profile to prompt for credentials (security tab). Then opened Outlook. I was
then able to close Outlook, change the Outlook Profile to no longer request
credentials. Then when I reopened Outlook it worked fine. Any feedback if you
have it is also appreciated.

Bucket
www.teamterry.net
_

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Email problem with Office 2007 Attachments

Posted: 31 Aug 2008 04:34 AM PDT

Hi,

Are you using a SBS server?
If yes I would post this in a SBs group since there might be a filter on the
SBS exchange - a standard exchange server does not have such a filter.

Leif

"Malik Asif Joyia" <microsoft.com> skrev i
meddelelsen news:com... 

Can a UIDL be non-unique? 2nd request

Posted: 29 Aug 2008 02:15 PM PDT

In article <phx.gbl>, net
says... 
What's another exchange resource on the web where I can ask? UIDL if you
read aobut it is a lot like a primary key in a database table. It's got
to be important for people who program against email stores.

First Ex2007 in Ex2003 Org - [WP]

Posted: 29 Aug 2008 08:14 AM PDT


Thanks Mark for your input.

Yes, I knew it, just wanted to make sure.

Cos in production ...

I will deploying CAS Role first on 2 different servers with NLB, then I will
put HTS on these same boxes one by one ....

I will then have to make sure that I add the second HTS to the two way RGC
which gets created when the first HTS is deployed .....

I am having fun here with all those typos when I create those connectors
using the cmdlets.



"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

two users one mailbox

Posted: 29 Aug 2008 03:02 AM PDT


"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
"Send is" is the solutio, thx for help

PowerShell Export-Mailbox filtering does not work

Posted: 29 Aug 2008 02:08 AM PDT

I'm using an MSDN version.
--
Serge


"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

delete old e-mail

Posted: 28 Aug 2008 01:42 PM PDT

Hello,

You mean I just create a blank exchange database then move old date e-mail
to this new blank database?
Is this possible for outlook 2003 can have 2 exchange databse? and how?
So far, I combine one exchange database and PST files.

Thanks


"John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" wrote:
 

Email Forms submittal

Posted: 28 Aug 2008 06:41 AM PDT

No it isn't in the queues. It appears to be stuck on the server that I'm
sending it from, which doesn't have Exchange, only the smtp service
installed. I noticed that the address I'm sending from has to just be the
internal account name, but the address I'm sending to needs to be the entire
address, even when they're the same address. This may be by design, I don't
know.

Thanks




"Michael Dragone" wrote:
 

How to block russian commercial spam ?

Posted: 27 Aug 2008 11:59 PM PDT

Ed Crowley [MVP] <net> wrote: 

Go Bears?
 

Mail Delay for One User - [WP]

Posted: 27 Aug 2008 11:09 AM PDT


Thanks Ed for your input.

The user using OL2002 was set to offline ...so now I have config her OL to
online and lets see,



"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Count user accounts in storage group

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 11:53 PM PDT

Andy thanks again for help. I didn't know that this could be done through
EMC fitler settings.
Regards,Miha
"Andy David {MVP}" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Hardware recommendations for Exchange 2007 - 40 Gig store - 50 cli

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 10:35 PM PDT

RAM looks low. I just got done with a really nasty issue with the AMD dual
core opterons. Even though the server is Windows 2003 R2 SP2, still ended
up having to put the \usepmtimer switch in the boot.ini.

See:


http://blogs.technet.com/clint_huffman/archive/2008/03/21/warning-perf-counter-data-might-be-inaccurate-on-some-amd-processor-computers.aspx

http://blogs.technet.com/mikelag/archive/2008/08/26/certain-amd-processors-might-cause-inaccurate-counter-data.aspx




When memory is tight, working set trimming is a larger issue, so look at the
recommendations in

http://blogs.technet.com/mikelag/archive/2007/12/19/working-set-trimming.aspx

as well.

You don't mention anything about storage, what were you planning on using
for disk?



"Bucket" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Mailbox Manager Registry keys

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 06:09 PM PDT

Hi Mark,

I've set the start time on the servers to be Saturday at 6:00p (using the
15-min view). I had been running mailbox manager in 'generate report only'
mode for the last month to let users see what was going to happen when it
actually changed to 'delete immediately' mode.

Since changing to 'delete only' mode, the process does not run through all
the mailboxes (there are a lot of messages to delete!) but still produces the
'has run successfully' report.

So, I was thinking there was possibly a time limit set as to how long the
process runs. On some of my servers it will run for 45 minutes and stop,
some close to 2 hours. But none of them finish processing all mailboxes like
it did when I was in 'generate report only' mode.

Hope that helps to clarify. Thanks for your time!


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Can a UIDL not be unique?

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 01:27 PM PDT

In article <#phx.gbl>, net
says... 

(I really need help with this, so I'm reposting)

OK. Frankly I don't know much of anything about the exchange server, how
it's used, so I can't say if it's being used in that manner or not.

Can someone respond re my original questions?

Is it possible for UIDLs to be non unique? There are only 200 messages
on this exchange server, and most of the most recent 20 or so are using
duplicate UIDLs, at least according to the info I have.

Also is AAQG2TxAAAArJjnk2yIOau008N6VeH1P a 'normal' looking UIDL from
exchange? Or does it look truncated? My suspicion is that somehow the
UIDL values are being truncated, and thus rendered apparent duplicates
from the persective of my software.

Relay Error NDR Sending from Distribution List

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 09:12 AM PDT

What you're seeing could happen if DNS is somehow configured to send mail
for a domain to the wrong server. Of course, it could just be a
misconfigured environment at the recipient's end.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Stingray" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange to Exchange GAL Access on 2 Forests

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 08:23 AM PDT

Consider why you think you'd need a child domain. There's really nothing
you get with a child domain that you can't get with delegated organizational
units except extra cost.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Flaps" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange Server 2003 Performance Counters

Posted: 26 Aug 2008 02:05 AM PDT

S H A R I Q U E <microsoft.com> wrote: 

They aren't mutually exclusive.
 

Yes indeed.
 

Not necessarily. It's a good idea to have them on different ones, but most
of my small office servers are configured similarly, although with SAS or
SCSI drives.

You can't tell anything until you get yourself into a supported & patched
configuration, really.

 

Can Exch. 2003 Ent. Be Migrated to 2007 Standard?

Posted: 25 Aug 2008 03:49 PM PDT

Whoever you talked to was wrong. You can most definitely "transition"
from Enterprise to Standard due to the reason Ed stated; you cannot do
an in-place upgrade.

--
Elan Shudnow
http://www.shudnow.net



"Diane" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com:
 

Calendar Items to the wrong people

Posted: 25 Aug 2008 02:31 PM PDT

Burnabyryan <microsoft.com> wrote: 

There has to be something set up in the delegate or rules settings for this.
Check in the recipient's Outlook. And by recipient I mean the one who has
the delegate. 

Moving Mailboxes via script

Posted: 25 Aug 2008 02:24 PM PDT

I maintain that my way is best for the scenario you describe. Still if
you're constantly moving lots of mailboxes, something is wrong with your
provisioning process.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Bob Smith" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Macbook snyc with exchange

Posted: 25 Aug 2008 01:16 PM PDT

Martin Blackstone [MVP] <com> wrote: 

I'd go for that (or other virtualization sw) rather than bootcamp. Much
easier on the users.