Pages

Search

Some users cannot receive external e-mail - Microsoft Exchange

Some users cannot receive external e-mail - Microsoft Exchange

Some users cannot receive external e-mail

Posted: 09 Apr 2008 08:25 AM PDT

Does Mesage Tracking say it was delivered to the mailbox though?

Oliver

Transcation log files

Posted: 08 Apr 2008 08:41 AM PDT

"R Tay" <microsoft.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:com...
 

Splitting data in two different partitions on the same physical disk(s) is
totally useless in terms of performance.


Massimo

Phantom Exchange 5.5 Public Folder ACLs on 2003 PFs, help!

Posted: 07 Apr 2008 09:26 AM PDT

If you're still in mixed mode, the "ignore zombie users" reg key should do the trick. What gets logged in the application log?


"Brian Day" <net> wrote in message news:com...
We're mixed mode still. We have one 5.5 site left to go, but it was not the site any of these came from.

"John Fullbright" <fjohn@donotspamnetappdotcom> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl...
If you're already in native mode, it won't work.

John

"Brian Day" <net> wrote in message news:com...
Been there, done that, bought the T-Shirt. Unfortunately most of the options there assume you still have the Exchange 5.5 site these came from still up and running. I could run through all the options again and see if I missed something useful the first time.

Even slapping the "Ignore Zombie Users" reg key on the PF servers doesn't seem to have helped.

"John Fullbright" <fjohn@donotspamnetappdotcom> wrote in message news:phx.gbl...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328880/en-us should point you in the right direction


"Brian Day" <net> wrote in message news:com...
Hi All,

I'm having a hell of a time removing some phantom permissions on public folders. They are for accounts that existed in an Exchange 5.5 site, which has been retired many months ago.
These public folders exist today on and are ted between our two Exchange 2003 SP2 dedicated public folder servers. When I try to remove them using ESM or PFDavAdmin v2.8 I get the following errors;

From ESM:

An unknown error has occurred.

ID no: 8004010f
Exchange System Manager

From PFDavAdmin:

Exception: The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found:


The event log entries look like this;


An error occurred while upgrading the ACL on folder [Public Folders]/FOLDERNAME located on database "First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (SERVERNAME)". The Information Store was unable to convert the security for /O=(removed the org info)/CN=EVERYONE33630080 into a Windows 2000 Security Identifier. It is possible that this is caused by latency in the Active Directory Service, if so, wait until the user record is ted to the Active Directory and attempt to access the folder (it will be upgraded in place). If the specified object does NOT get ted to the Active Directory, use the Microsoft Exchange System Manager or the Exchange Client to update the ACL on the folder manually. The access rights in the ACE for this DN were 0x400. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.


So far everything I've tried hasn't worked, anyone have a better idea?

Thank you!

How to find individual mailbox limit

Posted: 07 Apr 2008 04:49 AM PDT

Exchange 2003
--
Syed Hasnain Ali


"Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" wrote:
 

Backup Public Folder Problem

Posted: 06 Apr 2008 09:02 PM PDT

Billy Leung <send.me.mail.com> wrote: 

Glad to hear you're back in business. 

Exchange 2007 in new domain

Posted: 06 Apr 2008 01:45 AM PDT

I'd try restoring the DC onto new hardware, usually it'll work OK, if the
disk drivers aren't compatible and it won't boot after the restore just pop
the CD in and do a repair install over the top

Peter Lawton

"Bernard J." <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Multiple Information Stores

Posted: 05 Apr 2008 09:55 AM PDT

In addition to backup and restore advantages, by starting with 4 SGs and
leveling the stores across the SGs, you minimize contention for the log
files.

As far as offline defrags are concerned, why are you doing them? In an
Exchange server enterprise environment there is no point; you do more harm
than good. offline defrag is a repair process and was never intended to be
part of regular maintenance.





"lsukip" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

main mailserver hosting on Linux - forwarding only one email to ex

Posted: 05 Apr 2008 12:11 AM PDT

Again, my manager only wants to have push mail functionality, and not about
groupwise/collaboration functions.

"Massimo" wrote:
 

Possible Exchange Database Corruption

Posted: 04 Apr 2008 11:46 AM PDT

They had wanted to try and fix this prior to migrating the mailboxes
They have a 17GB store, edb about 11.6GB and the STM about 6.6 GB
A Windows NT backup also fails, looks like an issue maybe in the STM
The system is up and running at the moment
I wanted to review what I should run, was thinking the eseutil /p eseutil /d
and isinteg -fix?
They do not do circular logging so they have logs back til the last good
backup last week
Would I make a copy of the entire MDB folder (databases and logs) prior to
running the utilities? Is this sufficient to get back to where they are if
the utils have issues?
Would I also need to exmerge mailboxes in case of issues?
Any idea of the average amount of time to run these utilities against a
database this size?
Thanks
Chris W

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

PF usage much too high

Posted: 04 Apr 2008 04:05 AM PDT

Note if you have enabled LCR also this again requires more ram.

Oliver

Exchange 2007 Expired Certificate

Posted: 03 Apr 2008 01:33 PM PDT

Thanks Oliver

New-ExchangeCertificate -Services IIS
was the right thing to do for me.
The warning disappeared in Outlook and everything works fine.

I tried to remove the other useless certificates with
Remove-ExchangeCertificate -Thumbprint <String>
but one is still reluctant and says that it is the default certificate and
can't be removed.
Is that normal?

Regards
Nicolas


"Oliver Moazzezi [MVP]" <co.uk> a écrit dans le
message de news: %phx.gbl... 

Sharing calendar and tasks

Posted: 02 Apr 2008 07:28 AM PDT

David <microsoft.com> wrote: 

What versions?
 

....plus centrally manageable antivirus software (including Exchange AV), a
good UPS, backup device/media (tape or HDD or whatnot), etc. - and all your
workstations need to be on a domain-compatible OS.
 

Centralized management and security and storage of your mail, ease of
configuration, Out of Office, OWA, RPC over HTTP, wireless Activesync, etc
:-) 

NTBackup of Exchange

Posted: 02 Apr 2008 01:17 AM PDT

Lanwench / Paul

Many thanks!

That cleared my confusion even though the solution of how to get It "aware"
was not the way i thaught.
I been searching a wile on the Internet and realy dont find the info on this
subject anywere.

I was both right and wrong, most important, i was right ;-) just
kidding... this gives some to labb with ...

Thanks again

--
Henrik Arenblad, MCP SBS,


"Paul Robichaux [MVP-Exchange]" <net> wrote in message
news:buckeye-express.com... 

Exch 2003 and SQL 2005

Posted: 01 Apr 2008 09:41 AM PDT

"ADP Comm" <microsoft.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:com...
 

Other than performance issues, potential incompatibilities and security
issues, it will also be a lot more difficult to troubleshoot such an
installation if something should go wrong.
Microsoft doesn't recommend it, and I agree with them:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997379(EXCHG.80).aspx

If you really, really, *really* need to host both applications on the same
server, at least try to use different physical disks for the operating
system, the SQL Server database files and the Exchange ones.


Massimo

Public Folder won't mount

Posted: 01 Apr 2008 07:16 AM PDT

On Apr 1, 6:42pm, Christoph Wilfing <net> wrote: 

First of all thanks very much for your responses.

I had to move it to another folder as the C: Drive was nearly full.
I
moved the relevant files (priv1.edb, prv1.stm, pub1.edb and pub1.stm)
within Exchange System Manager to a new folder on the F: Drive. When
I went to mount them only the Private store mounted.


I am using Exchange 2003 with SP2


Many thanks in advance

Error503 This mail server requires authentication when......

Posted: 31 Mar 2008 02:26 AM PDT

Since you didn't describe what software your client is running, we have no
way of knowing whether you've posted in the wrong place.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"EvilJim" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

After 2007 migration mail sometimes duplicated in outbox ??

Posted: 31 Mar 2008 01:07 AM PDT

Is there anything in the event log? I've seen this when the server has
insufficient disk space, causing a problem called "backpressure".
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"MaartenH" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

send on behalf of "group"

Posted: 31 Mar 2008 12:27 AM PDT

When you create a delegate through outlook, the user is added to the
publicdelegates attribute of the delegating user. Delegates have send on
behalf of permission. You could script adding the users to the
publicdelegates attribute. Take a look at
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/912918/en-us


"Ed Crowley [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:eh%phx.gbl... 

Exclude Recipient from Antigen Filtering

Posted: 31 Mar 2008 12:10 AM PDT

HI Raul,
I am not not using Exchange SP2 IMF, only Antigen 9.0.
Regards
Nicolas


"El niño santo de Emaus" <es> a écrit dans le message de news:
phx.gbl... 

[203.81.234.238] is currently not permitted to relay>

Posted: 30 Mar 2008 10:12 PM PDT

If you are using POP3 Downloader or SMTP for that matter, then using a ISP
or Filtering Service Smarthost is a better solution. Less likely chance of
your mail being rejected by a Spam Filter.

--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2008
Microsoft Certified Partner


"S H A R I Q U E" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange server NDR #5.7.1

Posted: 30 Mar 2008 08:27 PM PDT

Where is the NDR coming from? Please post the full NDR and the naming
context surrounging it. Are they sending to everyone by selecting all
mailboxes from the GAL, or are they using a distribution group? Do they
have rights to send to that many recipients? If they're sending to a
distribution group, do they have rights to send to that group?
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"Jian Ming" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Deploy RPC over http settings globally

Posted: 30 Mar 2008 08:16 PM PDT

well this is my last resorts if still no solutions for it ..

But i'm thinking get cleared of something. :

1)One webserver / sites can have multiple SSL cert rite ?
2)Or only one webserver can have one SSL cert but multiple domain in one
cert ?

Or both is correct however exchange only can work with option two.



"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

New Public Store file

Posted: 28 Mar 2008 02:24 PM PDT

Thanks.
Sometimes we just know these things but it always feels better to
have another validate it.


"John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Email display name/email address

Posted: 28 Mar 2008 01:13 PM PDT

No, because an email needs to come from somewhere, the email address is there
for the receiver to know that the email is legit and came from someone that
they know.

Cmnsol wrote: 

--
Message posted via http://www.winserverkb.com