Initialzing VBA variables for use as constants? Microsoft Project |
- Initialzing VBA variables for use as constants?
- Free Slack calculation?
- Calendar durations (again)
- Can I build a Technology Roadmap using Microsoft Project?
- Problems with a filter in VBA
- How is actual duration calculated at the project summary level?
- Duration vs. Start / Finish
- resource and materials planning
- reschedule uncompleted work in Microsoft 2002 with constrainst?
Initialzing VBA variables for use as constants? Posted: 19 Sep 2005 10:06 PM PDT Exactly, thanks. "Rod Gill" <rod AT project-systems DOT co DOT nz> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... or for |
Posted: 19 Sep 2005 06:50 PM PDT Hi, To my knowledge it is the normal calculation rule as published anywhere just that it takes into account constraints and deadlines. If you want to rule these out I'm afraid you shouldn't enter any :-) -- Jan De Messemaeker Microsoft Project Most Valuable Professional http://users.online.be/prom-ade/ +32-495-300 620 "G Lykos" <com> schreef in bericht news:phx.gbl... And no it all the |
Posted: 19 Sep 2005 07:58 AM PDT Hi Martin, Can't you use a lag of 52 weeks or 365 days? FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be seen at this web address: http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :) Mike Glen MS Project MVP Jan De Messemaeker wrote: |
Can I build a Technology Roadmap using Microsoft Project? Posted: 19 Sep 2005 06:16 AM PDT OK, Alan, but what have you done and what can't you do? Please be more specific! Mike Glen Project MVP Mapper2 wrote: |
Posted: 18 Sep 2005 11:58 PM PDT In article <googlegroups.com>, com wrote: Ron, If you want to use VBA why not do everything in VBA (i.e. create the filter, automatically set the two week window and print each resource's report)? Without actually testing your code out, it seems to me there is a basic flaw in the implementation. The code loops through each resource. As it loops it applies a filter but that filter appears to be a task filter when in fact it should probably be a resource filter (at least that might explain why the "name" portion doesn't work - in a task filter resources are identified by the "Resource Names" field while in a resource filter resources are identified by the "Name" field). Instead of looping through resources why not loop through tasks. Set the filter (using the FilterEdit Method) to look for all tasks that have a Start date less than or equal to a date two weeks from the current date or a Finish date less than or equal to a date two weeks from the current date and a Resource Name that is modified automatically each time through the print loop. It might even be beneficial to sort the whole file by Resource Names (do not keep outline structure) before applying the filter. I suggest looping through tasks instead of resources because filtering on resource dates may give tasks (assignments) outside the range of interest (remember, resource start and finish dates span the resources entire assignment period). As far as not printing blank pages when no assignments appear for a particular resource in the time span, a selected set construct can be used, for example: On Error Resume Next SelectTaskColumn Set Area = ActiveSelection.Tasks If Err > 0 then [skip printing] On Error GoTo 0 'clears error Else [print] End if Hope this helps. John Project MVP |
How is actual duration calculated at the project summary level? Posted: 17 Sep 2005 06:57 AM PDT Thanks, Steve. "Steve House [Project MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Sep 2005 04:28 PM PDT hi James, Enter 4hrs in the work field. Change the task type to fixed duration and make the duration field 1 week - Start date to Mon 8/29/05 and the Finish date to Fri 9/2/05. Following is the link where you can explore the basics of scheduling in Microsoft Project: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/assistance/HA010211711033.aspx Kind regards, -------------- Haris http://www.manage-systems.com --------------------------------------- "James" wrote: |
resource and materials planning Posted: 16 Sep 2005 07:25 AM PDT HI Bob, This might work: In the Resource Sheet, create a new resource "Steel Pillars". Enter it as a resource Type: Work and make the Max. Units 100. Now, for each task requiring the pillars, change the Task Type to Fixed Units and Uncheck Effort Driven. Now enter Units as the number of pillars required for that task. You might like to have a look at my series on Microsoft Project in the TechTrax ezine, particularly #5 & 10 on Resources, at this site: http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc or this: http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMFrame.asp?CMD=ArticleSearch&AUTH=23 (Perhaps you'd care to rate the article before leaving the site, :) Thanks.) FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be seen at this web address: <http://www.mvps.org/project/> Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :) Mike Glen MS Project MVP material bob wrote: |
reschedule uncompleted work in Microsoft 2002 with constrainst? Posted: 15 Sep 2005 09:31 AM PDT Hi dalbaugh, Well, I thought that scheduelling from the start would remove the constraints produced by scheduelling from the finish that are preventing the August hours from being pushed forward to September. Did you try that? Alternatively, select all the tasks and then in Task Information, reset all constraints to As Soon As Possible. Mike Glen Project MVP microsoft.com wrote: |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Project To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |