Pages

Search

Limiting the number of recipients of a message - Microsoft Exchange

Limiting the number of recipients of a message - Microsoft Exchange

Limiting the number of recipients of a message

Posted: 17 Mar 2006 03:13 AM PST

The DS is in the AD.
I did find this from microsoft
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;126497

But ......:((( help me please :)

Fatias
__________________________________________________ ________

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:com... 

IMF

Posted: 17 Mar 2006 01:24 AM PST

Also check out WinDeveloper IMF Tune.
--
Bharat Suneja
MCSE, MCT
www.zenprise.com
blog: www.suneja.com/blog
-----------------------------------------


"Godwin Lam" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

HELP: write-protected contacts

Posted: 16 Mar 2006 11:53 AM PST

In article <com>, Mark Arnold [MVP]
wrote:
 

I don't think it is a permission problem. Even though I am an admin and
have full control on that folder I can not change all the contacts in the
folder. I can change most of the contacts, but not all of them. I gave
three people full access on that folder but they also cannot change all of
the contacts...

OWA in frameset

Posted: 16 Mar 2006 07:35 AM PST

Yes.
One of the reason is the following:
I want to have a "navigation frame" were all our users are listed with a
link to their shared calendar

If I click on the user, his calendar is showed in the main fraime.
This is a very fast and easy setup to work with different calendars of other
users.

Also other customisation can be done without the need of rewriting the
OWA-pages.

sounds good? please help me to implement it :-)

regards,
bart




--

================================
Bart Plessers
K.U.Leuven
Dienst AIV
de Croylaan 52B
BE-3001 Heverlee
Belgium
tel +32 (16) 32.22.17
fax +32 (16) 32.29.67
gsm +32 (498) 68.88.22
================================

"Nuevo" <com> wrote in message
news:e$fXe$phx.gbl... 

GroupWise to Exchange Migration

Posted: 15 Mar 2006 11:30 AM PST

Fitz -

Yes this seems to be the critical hanging point. I needed to break out my
OLD GroupWise 5.5 CD and install the snapins to make the API object visible
in NWADMIN32. Before it showed the GroupWise objects with "?" next to them
since ConsoleOne is now the preferred method for managing GroupWise. Anways,
it seems to have done the trick in viewing the Required Parameters field.

Thanks!

"Fitz Crittle [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Are there major Problems w/SP2 and ActiveSync (PUSH email)

Posted: 15 Mar 2006 08:34 AM PST



In news:com,
joco <microsoft.com> typed: 

It doesn't matter where the vendor is based, does it? All that matters is if
they have released the updates for their devices.
The ISP is feeding you a line. Push mail works fine. Is it as good as
Blackberry? That's your call.

Weird Icon Appeared!

Posted: 15 Mar 2006 06:31 AM PST

Thanks Lee! Much Appreciated!

"Lee Derbyshire" wrote:
 

MSExchTrans EventID 7010

Posted: 15 Mar 2006 02:43 AM PST

Thanks! I am not using SBS server and I found
the remote host is sending email to us! Becuase I had contact the remote
site to confirm. They claim they can't send us the email.

-david


"Loay Olabi" <olabinet.net> wrote in message
news:com... 
fact 
The 
server 
was 
0 
10750 

OWA Changing logo into company logo

Posted: 15 Mar 2006 02:05 AM PST

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:26:28 -0000, Lee Derbyshire wrote:
 

no i only aplied it to the default theme 0, but i will try start/stop the
iis and look again

Running Multiple Exchange Servers

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 05:52 PM PST

*Yes, they are in the same Forest, yes they are in the same exchange
organization.

*The NEW exchange server can ping the FQDNS of both my GC's. My new
exchange server is not a DC. Both DCs can ping his workstation name.

*No Smarthosts are setup, I did some research on it and could not find
a clear explination of what it was for. I found plenty of examples of
where to use it but my situation is odd. Explain to me what this
smarthosting exactly is, maybe thats my problem.

*Network connectivity is good, they are all on the same subnet, on the
same switch.

*Just checked, they are both in the same routing group.

2 (or more servers.. I think the upper limit seen in operation is 1000
Exchange servers per Exchange Org) can exist in a Forest.
- Are they in the same Forest? If yes, they belong to the same Exchange
Org.
- Can they resolve each other's fqdn? Can they resolve fqdns of GCs?
Test
name resolution.
- Does either server has a smarthost setup in SMTP virtual server
properties? Good practice to always use smarthosts on Connectors, not
SMTP
virtual servers.
- Do both of them have connectivity to each other and GCs?
- Did you add them to the same Routing Group? That'd be the default,
but if
you didn't, you could move them to the same Routing Group. Else, you'll
need
Routing Group Connectors on both ends to make them route to each other.

Smart Host and Internet Mail Service General Tab

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 02:40 PM PST

i) It is generally not advisable to insert smarthost in smtp virtual server
settings - this should be done on SMTP Connectors as you seem to be doing.
ii) Selecting "Use DNS... " does not uses a smarthost but delivers mail
directly using DNS lookups (to find out which mail hosts outbound mail for
that Connector needs to be routed to).
iii) The Smarthost settings (where you had IP address) will take either an
IP address [in square brackets if using IPs], or a fqdn, or a domain name.
(If you insert a domain it will lookup MX records for that domain). Using
fqdn is preferable over IP addresses - if the actual IP addresses change,
you don't need to take any action on your side, and if they're using
multiple hosts with same fqdn (DNS round robin) you will benefit from the
redundancy.
--
Bharat Suneja
MCSE, MCT
www.zenprise.com
blog: www.suneja.com/blog
-----------------------------------------


"C C" <net> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

Global Address List Missing

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 02:33 PM PST

Check which GC your exchange is pointing!
Can you resolve your GC from the clients?
check your DNS lookup by nslookup to your GC and the exchange
--
Loay Olabi
MCSA, MCSE
Website: http://www.olabinet.net
Blog: http://www.olabinet.net/loay


"whodey" wrote:
 

Exchange 2003 & other possible equipment needed?

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 02:05 PM PST

Bharat,

I just spoke with the user and they sent the NDR's to me. Of the 4 domains
1 is listed as the RDNS. I was incorrect in my original statement. It does
not appear they are requiring the RDNS to match as you stated. Thank
goodness.

If ISP’s do start requiring this would we have to have a separate exchange
server/public IP for each with it’s own RDNS? Or are there any other
possibilities?

Thank you for your time.


"Bharat Suneja" wrote:
 

Spam Mail folder

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 08:56 AM PST

Both are correct it was SCANMAIL that was causing this. I removed it from
SCANMAIL and the folder has been removed from Exchange. Thanks for your help.



"John Chen [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Exchange 2003 / 2000 Help

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 07:57 AM PST

- You can't replicate mailboxes to another server - if that's what you're
referring to - using any native tools.
Having said that, you should be ok with moving mailboxes to that server.
It's a tried and tested process and doesn't by itself corrupt a mailbox,
afaik.

- Public Folders are replicated to other Exchange servers in the Org from
the Replicas tab of the public folder's properties. This can be automated
using pfmigrate.wsf, including removal of the replicats from the old server.
--
Bharat Suneja
MCSE, MCT
www.zenprise.com
blog: www.suneja.com/blog
-----------------------------------------


"Ky IT Guy" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

mail forwarding from one Exchange 5.5 server to another

Posted: 14 Mar 2006 06:40 AM PST



In news:com,
Julie _at_GBS <microsoft.com> typed: 

Glad to help!
 

NNTP and WWW Services Switch to Disabled

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 12:54 PM PST

Ben,
Thanks for the advice.
It worked fine and I found that the DC Baseline Policy (template applied a
long time ago on the original W2K domain) was active.
In fact, once you migrate to the W2K3 domain, the policy is not visible any
more (I'm not completely sure of that, however) - unless you use the GPMC
tool.
So I changed the NNTP and WWW services and it works fine.
Best regards
Nicolas


"Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]" <ben_winzenz@nospamdotmessageonedotcom> wrote
in message news:phx.gbl... 
being 
website. 
Disabled, 
DNS 

New spam problem

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 11:04 AM PST

You should also goto the Default SMTP Virtual Server properties which
handles the inbound mail from the internet and enable the Filters on
the Virtual Server also. Enabling it under Global setting - Message
delivery only configures it but doesnt enable it.

Regards
Randy

another OMA problem

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 09:58 AM PST

I don't remember where i have found the information but i'm sure that is was
one Microsoft KB, i have reinstalled als asp.net components, i have tried to
resolve the problem following differents ways, the first time that i ahve
tried to use oma i have obtained the precedent error, then (with another pc)
i have created a new server installation ad at first time all worked fine, i
have installed sp1 of exch and all was ok, i have disintalled IIS and
reistalled it, i have stooped exchange and when i have restarted exch the
problem has been introduced, after this moment I am not successful to remove
the problem.
I will hope that you understand me, i have some problem with my english
Thanks Emanuele

RUS doesnt work

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 08:20 AM PST

I recreated the email policy and now it works fine. Wonder why it got
corrupted but its running 100% fine now.

Thanks alot for your help.

G.


"Bharat Suneja" <spam.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Attachments seem to get lost when using a contact from the address book

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 07:41 AM PST

It is.
But it handles these outgoing mail in the same way, wether you choose
com or com, right?
So why is he stripping the attachments for the alias, and not for the actual
address?
Or am I talking nonsense here?

greetz,

Serge


"Evar" <net> schreef in bericht
news:es4$phx.gbl... 

retrieve messages to distribution groups

Posted: 13 Mar 2006 07:22 AM PST

Or change the Distribution Group to a shared Mailbox and add the mailbox to
everyone's profile. Mail enabled Public Folder would work too but MS is
moving away from Public Folders so if you created it that way, you would
just have to undo it in the near future anyway...


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:com... 
recipients, 
the 
site 
others' 
third, 

Voicemail storage in Exchange 2003 and backups

Posted: 11 Mar 2006 03:44 PM PST

Quite possibly the outcome of the extra space required of voice mails. One
option is to add more disk and have backups run to a file on the new disk
and then use backup software to backup the file. One of the problems of
backup up large amounts of storage is the extra complexity and cost of
having adequate backup and recovery.



"Whitfill" <com(donotspam)> wrote in message
news:com... 

Policytest.exe exchange2003

Posted: 11 Mar 2006 11:06 AM PST

Hi, we ran setup \domainprep. This worked for 48 hours.
I re-ran policytest on the exchange server, and now I get the 'Right not
Found! again.
And the exchange server's 'system Attendant' is hanging.

Replication seems to be working fine?

thx jason

"Bharat Suneja" <spam.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...