Pages

Search

Mounting a Exch5.5 mailstore on a 2000 or 2003 Exch installation - Microsoft Exchange

Mounting a Exch5.5 mailstore on a 2000 or 2003 Exch installation - Microsoft Exchange

Mounting a Exch5.5 mailstore on a 2000 or 2003 Exch installation

Posted: 28 Dec 2005 06:41 AM PST

Thanks for the input.

Richard

"Jonathan Norris" <microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:com... 

Free Busy properties

Posted: 28 Dec 2005 06:40 AM PST

Keep in mind when you run guidgen you will have to reset all of your public
folder permissions...FYI

Have you tried running PFMIGRATE to move all the system folders?
--
Jonathan
No Warrenties Implied, Did you do a FULL backup today??????




"Bharat Suneja" wrote:
 

why to migrate from lotus to exchange

Posted: 28 Dec 2005 04:06 AM PST

Exchange 2003 is just as simple:)


--
Jonathan
No Warrenties Implied, Did you do a FULL backup today??????




"Asher_N" wrote:
 

globel catalog problem??

Posted: 28 Dec 2005 03:05 AM PST

Hi,

The exchangeserver isn't a domaincontroller and yes it can find both
domaincontrollers. Strange thing. The dns server with the problem could be
pinged but for the rest everything didn't fuction anymore.
Maybe the exchangeserver didn't thought there was a problem because it could
be pinged.

Ramon


"Ramon Niese" <nl> schreef in bericht
news:OVHO%phx.gbl... 

two computers accessing the same Exchange mailbox

Posted: 27 Dec 2005 07:22 AM PST

Thanks


"seth" <org> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

Substitute Information Store

Posted: 26 Dec 2005 03:01 PM PST

Problem solved. Here is briefly what I did:
- Follow the advice provided in the Tutorial link you quoted.
- Allow the databases to be overwritten by a restore.
- Delete duplicated mail boxes.
- Run the Clean-up agent.
- Reconnect each mail box to its matching Windows account.

Thanks to everyone for their help - much appreciated!


"Jonathan Norris" <microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:com... 
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Restoring-Exchange-Server2003-Alternate-Hardware.html 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2003/drchecklist.mspx 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/2003/library/disrecopgde.mspx 
and 

Copy a message from a domain to a specific user

Posted: 23 Dec 2005 01:58 PM PST

Birol,

Yes that would work if the email sender was always being directed to the
same recipient however the recipient can be multiple people. Lets say there
are 3 people in a company for which you work. You are to get all of my
emails. One day I send you an email and you receive it. The next day I send
an email to your coworker, the following day I send an email to a different
coworker. Then lets say your company hires a 4th person, then a fifth
person... and so on.
Am I to configure forwarding all of your coworkers email to you
specifically? You would then get not only my email but also the email of
everyone the sends to each of your coworkers. What if your company was 100
people and all you wanted was all email from people in my company?
That is my dilema. If you have any other suggestions please let me know.
Thanks.

"birol" wrote:
 

Not in Group but mail still recieved

Posted: 23 Dec 2005 09:54 AM PST

I once had a similar situation and it was really stupid. I had a recipient
who had a hidden address that was also forwarding to another person. The
person was not in a group but the hidden recipient was so it appeared as
though messages sent to a group were going to someone outside the DL. You
may want to make sure no one within the group is set to forward to this
person.

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

E2K3: Connectors

Posted: 23 Dec 2005 08:29 AM PST

"Jon Doe" <net> wrote:
 

It would help if you noted what O/S you're using, too. W2K3 SP1 has a
problem with the tcpip.sys driver that causes weird problems that are
usually traceable to bad MTU sizes.

Installing this MS hot fix usually cures the problem:

Installing security update MS05-019 or Windows Server 2003 Service
Pack 1 may cause network connectivity between clients and servers to
fail [898060]
 

It would also help if you said why the messages remain in the outbound
queue. Select the queue and look at the bottom of the window for the
reason.

Messages that are delivered to recipients more than once are most
often a problem caused by the receiving end of the connection.
Checking the SMTP protocol log may reveal some silliness like the
receiving server responding with a 4xx status at the end of the
message, immediately followed by a 2xx status. Exchange correctly
interprets that as a transient failure and retries the message later.
The receiving server thinks it's done a good job because it sent the
2xx status and sends the message to the final destination.
 

That's kinda confusing. An IMS is an Exchange 4.0 or 5.x thingy.
 

Create a new SMTP Connector in the routing group. Add "company.com" to
the "Addesss Space" tab. Assuming you want to send mail to a specific
server, change the "use DNS..." to "Forward all..." on the "General"
tab and put the name of the target server into the edt box. Select
one, or more, SMTP Virtual Servers as "Local bridgeheads".
 

I doubt it. We've had to do this several times to fix a problem, but
it's always been done *after* the troubleshooting, not as a part of
it.
 

I don't think you'll help very much by doing it unless you know *why*
you're doing it.

--
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Don't send mail to this address mailto:com
Or to these, either: mailto:com mailto:com mailto:com

OMA For Exchange

Posted: 21 Dec 2005 01:41 PM PST

I think what this is would be a list of SMTP Domains that can be imported
into the "Mobile Services" area in the Global Settings of the exchange
server. I would assume that there must be a setup for each mobile services
domain that may try to connect to the OMA service?

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Outlook 2003 cached mode behavior with message size limit

Posted: 21 Dec 2005 01:17 PM PST

I think it will solve my problem.

Thanks for your help Neo

"neo [mvp outlook]" wrote:
 

Mail being rejected from our Exchange server

Posted: 21 Dec 2005 08:46 AM PST

Hi Ben,

I think we have tracjed the problem down to certain users mailboxes
exceeding their size limits - one of the users affected called us when he was
trying to send a message internally and got a message stating his mailbox
exceeded the sizr - must have been deleting the warnings before hand.

"Ben" wrote:
 

Outlook 2003 on Win 2003 vs. exchange 2003

Posted: 21 Dec 2005 06:22 AM PST

"Asher_N" <com> wrote in message
news:46.248.16... 

Thanks for the Advice, that is ofcourse on a TS server, I'll try ask that
question in a TS group.

/Michael

redirect e-mail from existing domain to a new one

Posted: 20 Dec 2005 07:30 PM PST

MLA! wrote: 

Of course - ask away. Keep all questions in the groups, though. :)