Pages

Search

Exchange on DC? In small network - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange on DC? In small network - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange on DC? In small network

Posted: 24 Jun 2005 03:55 AM PDT

Hi MArtin

I will - thanks a lot

Cheers

Lewej

"Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote:
 

how do I join exchange 2003 to an existing 2000/2003 organization?

Posted: 23 Jun 2005 11:12 AM PDT

This might be Active Directory replication related problem. Make sure your
DCs are all replicating properly. If the E2K3 setup program reports that
the Exchange server installed, then it had to have gone somewhere. :-)

You can also "focus" Exchange System Manager by manually creating a console
(run MMC.EXE, add the Exchange System console, then tell it which domain
controller specifically you want it to read the Exchange configuration
from.)
--
Jim McBee
Blog: http://mostlyexchange.blogspot.com
Stuff: http://geekbargains.blogspot.com
Web: http://www.somorita.com



"butter" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Performance suddenly drop

Posted: 23 Jun 2005 09:09 AM PDT

I restart the server most of the time. It will happen after 1-2 hour.
STORE.EXE used the memory around 200MB and sometimes 100% utilitize

-david

"Jim McBee (MVP)" <spambegone.net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
2000 
created. 
will 
Desktop) 

Exchange System Manager

Posted: 23 Jun 2005 08:27 AM PDT

Thanks! But it was useless.

"Youngblood" wrote:
 

Client Side rules or server side rules?

Posted: 23 Jun 2005 07:13 AM PDT



In news:%23H9vp1$phx.gbl,
Catbert <co.uk> typed: 

Use a shared mailbox for each of these addresses, rather than public
folders. Grant the users/groups Send As rights, and check out
www.ivasoft.biz for UniSent and RightFrom...no rules will be necessary

Exchange Monitoring Tools

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 02:19 PM PDT

Paco,

Exmon is a good tool that can be used to collect information on a server.
GFI allows monitoring at a service level. However, neither of these, at
least to my knowledge, can be used to accomplish what I am looking for. I'm
hoping to find something that can send a mail through the system so that the
integrity of the entire process can be tracked.

Kind Regards,

--
Colin M. McGroarty, MCSE, MCP+I, NT-CIP
2004 Microsoft MVP, Windows Server - General
www.McGroarty.org


"Paco" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com...
GFI mail essentials is a good tool, exmon too
www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads

"Colin M. McGroarty" wrote:
 

One or Multiple Mailbox Stores

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 11:41 AM PDT

Ben,

Thanks for the input, it sounds as if I'll be sticking with my current
setup.

Kind Regards,

--
Colin M. McGroarty, MCSE, MCP+I, NT-CIP
2004 Microsoft MVP, Windows Server - General
www.McGroarty.org


"Ben Winzenz [Exchange MVP]" <ben_winzenz@NOSPAMdotmessageonedotcom> wrote
in message news:phx.gbl...
Mark's right here, although you actually can back up separate mailbox stores
simultaneously with different jobs. Once all databases within a storage
group have been backed up, the logs will then be flushed. You won't see
performance "advantages" from having multiple mailbox stores, at least not
IMHO. The biggest reason would be as you say, to isolate corruption and
then if your backup window/restore window is tight. I would contend that
most causes of corruption (hardware issues) won't necessarily be such that
it is limited to just one mailbox store, but it's a valid argument.

--
Ben Winzenz
Exchange MVP
MessageOne


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:com... 

AD Replication via a Script

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 11:14 AM PDT

Thanks for the input. I had already set the replication to 15 minutes. I
have been using the AD Sites and Services to manually force replication but
just wanted to give our Help Desk an easier way. Thanks for your input.


Fred





"BCE" <net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
on 
and 
comments, 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''' 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''' 
server 
links 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''' 
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''' 
strTargetServer, 
has 
script 
When 
minutes 
e-mail, 
traffic 

Unable to send emails

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 05:26 AM PDT

you can go here, http://www.dnsstuff.com/ and enter a domain you are having
issues with at top right (titled DNS Lookup) and pick 'MX' from the drop
down and hit 'Lookup'. It should show you the full name related to the MX
record and then below it should give you the IP address for that name.
Telnet to that IP on port 25 (at command prompt: telnet <enter>, then open
IPaddress 25 <enter>) and see if you get a response. If not, you don't have
connectivity to that domain. If so, you can try the commands as explained in
the link Mark sent you for SMTP

"Ely Spiegel" <Ely microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
exchange 
I 
all I 
mail 
they 
not know 

Retreiving data issues

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 03:46 AM PDT

You do need to actually select which folders you're going to cache
(i.e. have in the OST file) it doesn't actually select them all by
default.

server security and mailbox access

Posted: 22 Jun 2005 03:01 AM PDT

nope just checked domain admins is member of domain.com/builtin administrators
--
George


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Message traffic

Posted: 21 Jun 2005 12:52 PM PDT


Thanks I'll take a look.

--
Tim

"djogon" <com> wrote in message
news:googlegroups.com... 

building an exchange server

Posted: 21 Jun 2005 09:05 AM PDT

Good information, George. Thank you for your time and advice.

"George" wrote:
 

Attachment blocking

Posted: 21 Jun 2005 04:56 AM PDT

"djogon" <com> wrote in message
news:googlegroups.com... 

We're using Trend Scanmail to do the attachment blocking, which takes care
of the anti-virus. We also have an appliance in the perimeter network which
handles anti-virus and anti-spam.

exchange 5.5. 289 and 1290 errors

Posted: 20 Jun 2005 12:04 PM PDT

Well, there aren't any 37 errors being logged on the server. In addition,
the x.400 connectors are all scheduled for "always", not "never".

Any other ideas?

end of line,

Reed

"seth" <net> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl...