Pages

Search

Connecting to Office OWA from Home SBS 2003 network - Microsoft Exchange

Connecting to Office OWA from Home SBS 2003 network - Microsoft Exchange

Connecting to Office OWA from Home SBS 2003 network

Posted: 09 Jan 2005 05:35 PM PST

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:00:35 +0800, "jeff" <fjhfhfhf>
wrote:
 
So it seems you can actually get to the server then and you are just
seeing what ammounts to broken links.
DP has put some tips on his site at:
http://www.petri.co.il/configure_isa_to_publish_owa.htm but I'm not
sure it's applicable here. Interesting you've switched to TCP85
though. Do you have the problem if you go back to tcp 80?

Exchange 2000 --> 2003

Posted: 07 Jan 2005 09:48 AM PST

Keep this in mind
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822931


Mike wrote: 

IMC Working path

Posted: 07 Jan 2005 06:24 AM PST

Thanks Mark. I would'nt have figured it out myself.
SN
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:com... 
is 
to a 

Adding a confidentiality notice to Exchange

Posted: 06 Jan 2005 03:15 PM PST

If you are referring to a .sig (signature - occasionally known as a
disclaimer) that is placed on every outbound e-mail message and is not able
to be changed or removed by the user community, I would recommend EXclaimer
(www.exclaimer.com).

If you need a really robust toolset that includes the disclaimer, I would
suggest GFI Mail Essentials. There is a disclaimer portion of the software
will work after the 60 day trial for the software expires.

There are a ton of toolsets out there that can accomplish this goal
effectively. Here are links to some websites with information regarding the
various toolsets available:
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/content_control.htm

http://www.msexchange.org/pages/search.asp?query=disclaimer
http://www.policypatrol.com

If you are looking to add a disclaimer to all outbound SMTP messages and
don't want to spend a lot of money and have someone that is familiar with
VBScript as well as Exchange and SMTP event sinks, you may want to review
this KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317327

"SpinKid" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
editing 

Ex2k IM

Posted: 06 Jan 2005 09:50 AM PST

HI Bob,

Unfortunately, I dont have a backup :(
My company never intend to go further on LCS.
Thanks for replying.


"Bob Christian" <gmail.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Help with Exchange 2003

Posted: 06 Jan 2005 08:43 AM PST

1. Two mailboxes = Two users. Correct

2. Custom address list - open the properties of the list and click the
modify button. This is similar to the find tool in AD or you can add a
custom LDAP search if you wish. When you created the address list the filter
rules would have got you to the same place.

3. Contacts are created in AD, Right click, new, contact.

4. General email addresses like those can be created three ways;
a. Distribution list (mail enabled group) - mail appears in each
member users inbox.
b. Public Folder (mail enabled) - mail is held in public folder
and access is controlled by permissions on folder. Set default and anonymous
to contributor.
c. User Mailbox - create general user and give permissions to the
mailbox for people to access.
The best way is probably A or B, but it depends on your environment and you
may find C works best for you. Test with at least two users and one general
account.


Glen




"Paul" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
and 
add 
as 
rights to 
Security 
using 
set 
the 
account 
can 
address 
you 
the 
is 
the 
external 
object, 
tutorial 
(previously 
help 
and 
to 
open 
2003 it 
OWA 

mail account for multiple users

Posted: 06 Jan 2005 08:17 AM PST

In addtion to Glen's opinion, if you going to use an additional generic
mailbox, take a look at UniSent utility:
http://www.ivasoft.biz/unisent.shtml

--
Regards,

Victor Ivanidze,
software developer


"Glen Trafford" <com.No.Spam> wrote in message
news:41de0788$.. 
the 
on 
name - 
give 
Mailbox 
mail 
to 
Exchange. 

Information Stores won't mount

Posted: 05 Jan 2005 03:20 PM PST

Martin,

You guessed right. That was exactly the error message I got. Interesting to
read your lines on JET. I never new the difference between JET Red and JET
Blue. I knew that Windows uses JET for other things (like the DHCP
database), but not that Exchange also uses it.

And yes, I am extremely happy that my Exchange is running again. I always
used SBS2003 and Exchange was one of the things I tried no to touch because
of it's assumed complexity. I now switched to Windows Server 2003 + Exchange
2003 in a non SBS2003 environment and find that Exchange is much more
admin-friendly once you get the hang of it.

Erik



"Martin Chisholm [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:crlbq5$abk$com... 

General Questions

Posted: 05 Jan 2005 12:43 PM PST

Chaplain Doug wrote: 

The inbox/calendar/etc should all be kept in the exchange mailbox, but you
can also use public folders for shared contacts, etc. 

Yes, in a public folder. 

Not easily. See http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/share.htm for other
options. If you have a small office/network, look at www.microsoft.com/sbs -
Small Business Server 2003 is a very good bargain & includes Exchange. 

Store.log

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 10:41 AM PST

Hello,

Thank you very much for this information.
Several servers had this setting turned on.

We were able to cleanup the large store.log files.

Kind regards,
Exchange2003

"Rob Wilcox [MSFT]" wrote:
 

maintenance question...

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 09:15 AM PST

plus, I don't see a generate report selection anywhere in recipient policies...?

--
Scott
"Genevieve Orchard [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl...
Hi Scott

Can you send more details about the recipient policy you set up for mailbox management? For instance, is there anything in your filter? Have you selected only 'Generate Report'?
It's just about impossible to know why no mailboxes are getting processed without more info about your policy.

- Genevieve

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only.
"Scott McDonald" <com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl...
I setup mailbox maintenance to occur on Sunday nights on our production exchange server and my home / test exchange server. Every time it processes I get the same message that nothing was done...why?

The Microsoft Exchange Server Mailbox Manager has completed processing mailboxes

Started at: 2004-12-31 23:04:45

Completed at: 2004-12-31 23:04:45

Mailboxes processed: 0

Messages moved: 0

Size of moved messages: 0.00 KB

Deleted messages: 0

Size of deleted messages: 0.00 KB


--
Scott