Public folder rules - Microsoft Exchange |
- Public folder rules
- ? on CAL's
- current IP is not allowed to Relay
- Storage Limit warning messages
- Top of Infromaton store errors
- s/mime problems with exchange 2003
- Received time stamp of the mails.
- Delivery to user's alternate address
- Exchange 2000/2003 ASP/ISP Deployment Guide
- Exchange DB size limit
Posted: 02 Sep 2004 03:00 AM PDT Of course? How would I know that? And by all messages I mean there is no criteria in the rule based on sender, recipient, subject etc...You could crank up logging and see if that reveals anything, otherwise, I would call PSS. On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:39:43 +0200, "Peak" <se> wrote: |
Posted: 01 Sep 2004 06:10 PM PDT You're welcome Matt. Ninon "Matt" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... wanted you DNS, was wondering be |
current IP is not allowed to Relay Posted: 01 Sep 2004 02:47 PM PDT You should check some of the real time black hole lists to see if you are on it. If these are new IP addresses for you then you may have had the misfortune of gettting IP addresses marked as SPAMMERs. I had an issue where I could not send email to hotmail via my Ex 2003 server just recently and forwarding to my ISP's SMTP server did the trick. RR may have the same setup as hotmail which prevents you from sending. "collin camp" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:46d501c4906d$49f90cb0$gbl... |
Storage Limit warning messages Posted: 01 Sep 2004 10:24 AM PDT Thank-you Paul. Have a great day ! wrote: exceeded PST want the http://www.winnetmag.com/Windows/Article/ArticleID/42514/42 514.html and http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/04/20/117024.as px for more details. |
Top of Infromaton store errors Posted: 01 Sep 2004 07:20 AM PDT You may want to check Veritas website. For example I found this article: http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/231185.htm You'll probably find an answer on their website or you can contact them. By the way, their e-mail support is free. http://www.veritas.com/besupport/backup_exec_windows.html?location=PrdSelect Best of luck <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:43e601c49037$d1d9cf10$gbl... |
s/mime problems with exchange 2003 Posted: 01 Sep 2004 06:27 AM PDT We solved this problem by by changing the email format from the outlook default html format to rtf. Thanks to all. Paul Robichaux [MVP] wrote: |
Received time stamp of the mails. Posted: 01 Sep 2004 02:31 AM PDT "Sometimes" it's off by hours! Have you got a trend to this? If it were your AD at fault you would have perhaps an hour or more difference but the domain time synch would keep the minutes/seconds in sync. It would just be the appearance of being out due to time zones. On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:52:14 -0400, "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote: |
Delivery to user's alternate address Posted: 31 Aug 2004 08:57 AM PDT Thanks, Glen, will do. Thanks for the hide tip. Regards, Joan "Glen Trafford" <com.No.Spam> wrote in message news:4135172e$.. the user msn Recipient users. |
Exchange 2000/2003 ASP/ISP Deployment Guide Posted: 31 Aug 2004 03:41 AM PDT Hi Andrew, coool :) THX. But why has it vanished and why isn't there any whitepapers for Exchange 2003 out there (com)? Tobias Redelberger StarNET Services (HomeOffice) Schoenbornstr. 57 D-97440 Werneck Tel: +49-(0)9722-4835 Mobil: +49-(0)179-25 98 341 Email: net |
Posted: 31 Aug 2004 02:33 AM PDT No ones mailbox size had grown dramatically, in fact even the sum of all mailboxes was no where near 16Gb! Surely if the data in the database was valid, ie valid emails, then it wouldn't have simply been recovered as part of regular database maintenance?? Could it somehow be related to importing email from a users PST file into there mailbox? The PST file was <50mb <co.nz> an the less SBS2000 mail is? |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |