Pages

Search

Exch 2007 and Outlook cached not synching correctly - Microsoft Exchange

Exch 2007 and Outlook cached not synching correctly - Microsoft Exchange

Exch 2007 and Outlook cached not synching correctly

Posted: 17 Dec 2008 07:36 AM PST

I will try it and see! Thanks for the info. Sort of surprised this was not
found on a web search. Thanks again!

"Wayne Hollomby" wrote:
 

pop3 virtual server - does not start automatically

Posted: 16 Dec 2008 02:49 PM PST

Good point. I will install sp2 and other updates needed and se what happens.
Thanks for the tip.

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
 

Spam blocking help needed

Posted: 16 Dec 2008 11:09 AM PST

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:09:49 -0600, "Clayton Sutton" <com>
wrote:
 

Most phishing mail doesn't depend on getting a reply through email.
They usually include a clickable link in the message that takes the
user to a compromised web site where the data are collected and,
sometimes, nice packeges of malware are deposited on the dupe's
machine. OTOH, lots of "419" mail depends on email replies (see
http://www.419eater.com).

The way to deal with this is to use a URIBL on inbound mail that
checks the domain names in the links against a database of known
spam/phishing/whatever domains. On the outbound side you want to
filter your outbound web traffic and prevent it from reaching the
compromiseds sites.
---
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP

Third party spam filtering setup: SSL and other setup questions

Posted: 15 Dec 2008 02:06 PM PST

Thanks, I'll check this out and let you know how it works out.

Greg

"John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" wrote:
 

Calendar time issue

Posted: 15 Dec 2008 10:52 AM PST

The odd behavior seems to only be on his WinXP (OL2003) and his Citrix
sessions (Win2003 Server). All the other users on this terminal server do
not have the same problem. I will investigate on his XP laptop. Would this
affect his Terminal Server sessions? If so, should it not also affect his
PDA and OWA sessions?


"Jon LaBarge" <net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Outgoing mail filtering

Posted: 15 Dec 2008 06:14 AM PST

Mark <net> wrote: 

In the properties of your virtual SMTP server. However, note that this may
not be the source of your issue. You may just be getting spam.
 

Sender & recipient & connection will help the most. 

Synchronizing GMAIL Email hosting Services with Exchange Server

Posted: 14 Dec 2008 09:05 PM PST

S H A R I Q U E <microsoft.com> wrote: 

As the other reply states, this is not natively possible. I suggest you stop
using Gmail to host your domain's mail - use Exchange itself.

where are emails coming from

Posted: 12 Dec 2008 06:58 AM PST

I found it!! .. There *were* AD accounts forwarding to the holdingcell
account. These accounts that were configured to send email to holding cell
were user templates for employees in each OU. being that they were part of
email groups these template accounts mailboxes where growing and email never
deleted. So, on the user template accounts I forwarded email to the holding
cell account and ran mailbox maintence on the holding cell mailboxes to
delete anything in there over 14 days. Why not run it on the template
accounts, because i wanted the template accounts to be in the mailstore where
the new user's mailbox should reside and I do have a longer "delete anything
over" time period configured.

At any rate... thank you John for shoving me to look into message tracking.

"Dan" wrote:
 

How to move Outlook files?

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 02:12 PM PST

Grandad <co.uk> wrote: 

No need to do anrything w/OST files if you can still open the mail profile,
even offline - you just export directly to PST. 

Simple Exchange Mailserver?

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 11:04 AM PST

com wrote: 

Do you have SBS2003 handy? If you're an MSDN or action pack subscriber you
may have a copy. Perhaps not as nice / fully featured as SBS2008 but would
do the trick for you, I think. You could run it in a VM on your 2008
machine.

Disk Space Issues

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 08:16 AM PST

Excellent,

Thank you very much for your Reply and the information. I really do
appreciate it. I will go ahead and get rid of the log files and the tmp
files as well.

Jon


"Diane Poremsky [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
news:utersA%phx.gbl... 

Mail deleting on it's own.

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 07:24 AM PST

No pattern so far old, new and mail that was just never delivered, so we
thought. I now have a new symptom. One use so far who recieves email via our
own newsletter... The mail we no where to be found i went into the "recover
deleted item" on the tools menu. I found the "missing" mail and still I'm
unable to recover it. These messages were new, yesterday. I'm not sure if
this is an outlook issue - she's using outlook 2007 or an exchange issue.

"Transam388" wrote:
 

Outlook Web Access - single email sent multiple times

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 06:56 AM PST

thats the thing, she can, doesnt matter the machine or browser. So it has to
be something on her acct or some weird PBKAC issue. I was hoping someone
would have seen this before. lol



"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
 

Move mailbox to new forest, new AD account

Posted: 11 Dec 2008 04:05 AM PST

Hi,

 

you could move him and rename or move and merge the accounts. I ´m not sure
whats the best solution for you, depends on how many users and how much
stuff you have to migrate and a few other things.
why do you want to migrate to another forest?

--
Viele Grüsse aus München

Walter Steinsdorfer
MVP Exchange Server
www.exusg.de
http://www.amazon.de/Exchange-Server-Outlook-Umstieg-Profis/dp/382732484X

Mailbox Permissions

Posted: 10 Dec 2008 01:19 PM PST

Thomas M. <com> wrote: 

Yep - many people have wished for that.

Exchange 5.5 migration to Exchange Server 2007

Posted: 09 Dec 2008 09:46 AM PST

Greetings,

I agree with Andy that your sales rep would be the best one to tell you what
you should do in terms of what to buy. However, you might consider this...
depending on the size of your organizaiton and the amount of preparation you
put into a smooth migration... if you can migrate quickly (go to 2003 and
then to 2007) then you could use evaluation 2003 and you wont have to worry
about paying for it.

You might also consider Quest Software for an easier move from 5.5 to 2007.
Then you don't have to use Exchange 2003 at all.
http://www.quest.com/exchange-migration-wizard/

Hope this helps.
J.Peter Bruzzese
(MCSE, MCT, MCITP: Messaging)
www.exclusivelyexchange.com


"Robin Olsen" <gov.sk.ca> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange 2003: Mirror Public folders with folder structure

Posted: 09 Dec 2008 08:26 AM PST

> 

Srsly? xD

Exchange crashes intermittently

Posted: 08 Dec 2008 11:02 AM PST

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:29:21 +0000 (UTC), Jonas Andersson
<com> wrote:
 
Yeah, he did say that he'd checked with exbpa. Not sure this would be
Exchange bringing the box down though. You might be best served by
putting a case into MSFT. They'll go through the crash dump and work
their magic.

Hosting a mailbox on more than one Exchange server at the same time for "high-availability"

Posted: 08 Dec 2008 03:10 AM PST

Not with 2003.
2007 offers CCR which is clustering with two separate copies of the mailbox
store.

But don't forget, if it "must never be down", you are going to need
redundant power, internet, routers, switches, firewalls, probably an offsite
DR location.
Not that I would expect you to have that, but I think its always important
to set realistic expectations for bosses that make those kinds of
statements. :)


"Spin" <com> wrote in message
news:individual.net... 

2007 issue with OAB generation on a CCR cluster?

Posted: 06 Dec 2008 07:36 AM PST

Thanks. It seemed to be a 2008 issue, but I wasn't sure. It's sounds like
there's a couple of similar issues in an OAB/CCR environment, one related to
the 2008 share name and the other related to the share not being created
after a failover.


Before I brought 2007 into the mix, I consolidated our Exchange 2003 public
folder tion to two servers. Then after I set up the Ex 2007 CCR with
the public folder store, I did a "move all s" from the one Ex2003
server to the 2007 one.

Currently we have a single 2003 PF server that is ting with the 2007
CCR public folders. I know that's not supported except during migration,
that's why I want to get this taken care of.

At this point, if I set the OAB generation to be on the CCR cluster, tell it
to use PF distribution, and remove all the public folders on the 2003 server
(and delete the public folder store), all our clients should be able to pick
up the address book, correct? And since the only PF store would be the CCR,
I shouldn't have any public folder issues if an unexpected failover happens,
correct?

Will the Outlook 2007 clients get the OAB from the public folders, if
they're available, or do they only use the CAS server?

At a later time, if I do want to use the web distribution for the OAB, I
would just have to make sure that the OAB is copied from the CCR to the CAS,
correct? I would think I could just set up a scheduled task to take care
of that every couple of hours or so.

Mike O.

"Family" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

SMTPSVC1 Log Files

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 01:46 PM PST

On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:35:04 -0800, "Martin Blackstone [MVP]"
<com> wrote:
 

Yea, we rolled our own, but they are out there.
 

Exchange 2007 and Outlook 2003

Posted: 05 Dec 2008 12:48 AM PST


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
 

Hi Mark,

thanks for your answer!

Is there any way to determine who created a Public Folder in Exchange?

Posted: 03 Dec 2008 05:14 PM PST

and you...together...actually, the guy did get into trouble because he put
all kinds of stupid emails he had sent out where he was complaining about
his boss...the folder was there before I started here, and it was one of the
justifications I used with my boss to lock down the ability to create
top-level public folders...it worked...hahaha...

--
Susan Conkey [MVP]



"Andy David {MVP}" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Named properties reached its quota

Posted: 03 Dec 2008 10:15 AM PST

You could download a copy of mfcmapi.exe and dump the named properties
tables for the other stores. I don't know that there's a different method to
grab that information. (note that named properties is a per-database, not
per-storage group thing).

As Dave said, you need to move the mailboxes from Fourth Storage Group\HQ
Group1 to a new mailbox database quickly.

Missy

"Chandra" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com...