Pages

Search

Silent Activation Office 2007 Enterprise? - Microsoft Office forums

Silent Activation Office 2007 Enterprise? - Microsoft Office forums


Silent Activation Office 2007 Enterprise?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008 01:20 PM PDT

A valid Office Enterprise has no activation. It has a Volume License

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Sapanaha" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... 

2003 office to 2003 office pro

Posted: 09 Sep 2008 12:30 PM PDT

of course not the anwser I wanted but that isn't your fault. I need Access
which is only on the Pro so I guess I will be installing it one way or
another.
--
Thanks
Deb


"Bob Buckland ?:-)" wrote:
 

Splitting an Office 2007 install

Posted: 08 Sep 2008 07:10 PM PDT

Sure, you're welcome.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact.
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/KB/555375


After furious head scratching, JC634 asked:

| This was the expected answer, but I had to ask!
|
| Thank you for replying so quickly.
|
| "Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]" wrote:
|
|| No, you cannot "split" up Office. See the Microsoft Software License
|| Agreement.
||
|| --
|| Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
||
|| Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact.
|| How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/KB/555375
||
||
|| After furious head scratching, JC634 asked:
||
||| I have Office 2007 installed on my main workstation. I also have a
||| WHS machine. I am one of several users over at WeGotServed who are
||| beta testing an add-in for WHS that provides an Outlook interface in
||| the WHS console. I am currently using a trial version of Outlook
||| during this testing phase.
|||
||| Once the add-in is released for general use, I would like to install
||| my licensed version of Outlook on my WHS and keep the remaining
||| portions of Office on my workstation. Finally, my question. Can a
||| license be split this way where part of the install in on one
||| machine and part on another?


INSTALLING OFFICE 2000 (UPGRADE) ON NEW COMPUTER

Posted: 07 Sep 2008 08:32 PM PDT

Hi Officeguy,

If you do not have any of the qualifying products listed here
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/210437/en-us
you can phone Microsoft product support (http://support.microsoft.com) about getting a replacement product key. For this type of
issue the state of support (i.e. mainstream vs extended) mentioned in previous replies, shouldn't matter, but it would likely be a
support call that would require you to pay for the support.

For your new computer, especially if running Vista you may want to consider upgrading, or trying the 60 day free trial of Office
2007 as an alternative
http://trymicrosoftoffice.com
as there won't be any additional updates for Office 2000.

=================
<<"OFFICEGUY" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com...
Help! I'm trying to install Office 2000 (upgrade) from my CD set on a new
desktop computer that I bought, but it won't let me install without a
previous version (I threw away the CD with the previous version years ago)?
Any suggestions? Thanks!>>
--

Bob Buckland ?:-)
MS Office System Products MVP

*Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends*


Install upgrade version of Office 2007

Posted: 06 Sep 2008 12:15 PM PDT

Hi Sharon,

You didn't mention the name of the .MSI filebut as a guess, it would be part of the original installation CD/image for Works.

There may have been some corruption in the MS Works installation. That can sometimes occur from using registry/cleanup utilities on
the computer. Some computers include a compressed version of the software provided and a provision to create your own backup CDs to
be used to install. Check with the computer supplier to see if that's the case.
=====
<<"armyedelen" <com> wrote in message news:com...

I also recently purchase a computer with Works 9.0 on it and can not
install the upgrade to Office Small Business 2007. I tried to fix the
error with the Works 9.0 download but do not have a disk for the .msi
file. Am I missing something because the Office product states the
upgrade is compatible with Works as long as I use the download which
will not download to my computer.

-Sharon <<
--

Bob Buckland ?:-)
MS Office System Products MVP

*Courtesy is not expensive and can pay big dividends*


installing office 2003 on machine that has office2000

Posted: 05 Sep 2008 08:43 PM PDT

Upgrading Office will only upgrade/replace the components included in the
version you are installing, so Access will remain, and function.
Ensure you have run Office update, before you install the later version


"Sissi" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 


Is Word 2007 Normal.dotm profile specific?

Posted: 05 Sep 2008 11:42 AM PDT

Hello Cameron,

You can deploy a customized Normal.dotm to users' profiles. However, as
Beth mentioned, users can modify their Normal.dotm unless you make some
restrictions to the normal.dotm.

If you have any questions, please let us know.

Regards,

Ada Pan

Microsoft Online Partner Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
================================================== ==
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
================================================== ==
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


"please wait while windows configures microsoft office professionaledition 2003" On roaming profiles

Posted: 04 Sep 2008 12:52 PM PDT

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/825941

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Wingnut" <com> wrote in message news:googlegroups.com... 

Office 2003/2007 on terminal server

Posted: 01 Sep 2008 06:41 AM PDT

Tanks Bob,

I know that Article. Untill now no luck with finding the answer. I'm
starting to believe that this isn't possible, or nobody knows which
registry keys/policies should be used.

I keep on looking :)

Cheers,
Gerard


On 1 sep, 16:35, "Bob Buckland ?:-\)" <75214.226(At Beautiful
Downtown)compuserve.com> wrote: