Pages

Search

Upgrading from Exchange 2003 Stndrd Edition to Exchange 2003 Ent. - Microsoft Exchange

Upgrading from Exchange 2003 Stndrd Edition to Exchange 2003 Ent. - Microsoft Exchange

Upgrading from Exchange 2003 Stndrd Edition to Exchange 2003 Ent.

Posted: 08 Jul 2008 03:06 AM PDT

since front-end server does not host mailboxes it only provides OWA,
SMTP,HTTP to clients...so....what do u think that i should i upgrade
Front-End server to Enterprise???...while upgrading back-end server does not
any suggestion it is implicit to upgrade that!!..
furthermore, can 64-Bit ADC coexist with 32-Bit DC??
please recommend a good exchagne 2003 clustering article which outlines
step-by-step procedure
thanks.


"Bharat Suneja [MSFT]" wrote:
 

all users outbox not sending, nothing coming in inbox

Posted: 07 Jul 2008 11:48 AM PDT

yes the db was mounted. found out the smtp protocal stopped. so I restarted
it and was OK. I would assume it would restart when I restarted the server or
the Exchange INfo Store but I guess not.

but I never saw that happen before i.e. the smtp just stop by itself, while
every thing else kept chugging along.

any thoughts on what could trigger that?

thanks for the input!
"Leif Pedersen [ MVP]" wrote:
 

[x-post] exchange 2003 public folder. appointment properties

Posted: 04 Jul 2008 06:37 AM PDT

 


Thank you Nikky for this 'user friendly' way to solve this problem.
I have tried another way (succesfully) but it was more and more complicate.

Marco

notification when users sends attachements

Posted: 03 Jul 2008 12:07 PM PDT

Any content monitoring application\appliance can do this.

Inboxer
http://www.inboxer.com/




James Chong (MVP)
MCITP | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+,
Security+, Project+, ITIL
mchangetips.blogspot.com



On Jul 3, 3:07pm, Sleb <microsoft.com> wrote: 

5.7.1 Message Refused and .LOCAL error

Posted: 02 Jul 2008 11:24 AM PDT


Thank you very much for the insight. It was very clear, concise and most of
all helpful. This helps clarify a lot. I thought this somehow might be
playing a role in the routing of messages.


Thanks again for taking the time to respond.

Regards,
Roman

"Bharat Suneja [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Out of office replies not returned if mail was sent to large dl

Posted: 01 Jul 2008 11:49 PM PDT

No we have checked it with multiple absent users, they had no mailcontact
with the sender during their out of office time.

Daniel

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Public Task List

Posted: 01 Jul 2008 02:10 PM PDT

Actually I meant event sink. Here's one place to start, but you're welcome
to search for "event sink" in MSDN and Google.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms987879.aspx
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"Andrew" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

can a mailbox be scanned and repaired on the server?

Posted: 01 Jul 2008 01:23 PM PDT

I suspect the profile was that way when I got here.
Client uses Outlook 2003, which I set for cache mode, and I started creating
pst's of folders before getting to work. there were no ost's or pst's on the
workstation before I began,
errors are fairly benign: user cannot share Tasks.

thanks,

"Ben M. Schorr - MVP (OneNote)" wrote:
 

Exchange 2007/Outlook 2003 Rules Limit?

Posted: 01 Jul 2008 12:07 PM PDT

Ahh, OWA. That's an interesting idea; good be a viable backdoor. Thanks for
the suggestion!

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Changing a User's Name

Posted: 01 Jul 2008 10:32 AM PDT

It can take up to two hours. How long did you wait?


"Mark Roberts" <com> wrote in message
news:googlegroups.com...

Never mind. Apparently a restart of Exchange was required to force
everything to update. Following the restart, all is well.

Name is not being displayed.

Posted: 30 Jun 2008 06:13 PM PDT

Hello,

Thanks for your feedback.

Since the most possible cause has been eliminated. I suggest you consider
the following situation:

1. Check if all the emails the user send out show up as " com
"? and everyone else see the same thing from their Outlook client?

This issue may occur if a faker use that user's name as sender to pretend
sending email to others. Therefore, people will see " com "
instead of AD display name because this email is not actually sent from the
genuine user. This situation may occur when sender use SMTP command to
telnet your SMTP server's 25 port and send email with fake sender address.
To test it, let the user send out email to everyone using Outlook with his
own profile and see if issue persists.

Telnet to Port 25 to Test SMTP Communication
<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/153119/en-us>

2. If the issue persists, please send me a test from that user if possible,
my email address is com

If we cannot resolve the issue after we perform the above steps, please
help me collect some information for further investigation:

Information Need
==============
If possible, please capture some screenshot when the issue appears and send
them to me : com

Hope this helps.

Thank you for your time and cooperation.


Best regards,
Robbin Meng(MSFT)

Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

Cannot access Global Address Book

Posted: 30 Jun 2008 06:12 PM PDT

Hi Eli,

No problem. It doesn't matter. :)

For other issues that are being discussed in other posts, I am just testing
and performing research. In this post, let's just focus on our original
GAB issue.

I'll reply to you as soon as there is any update on that issues. Thanks for
your time and patience.


Best regards,
Robbin Meng(MSFT)

Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

Business Contact Manager

Posted: 30 Jun 2008 10:27 AM PDT

jeffk <microsoft.com> wrote: 

On your Exchange server? You don't. In fact, as far as I know, BCM (which
you'd install on your workstation) doesn't integrate with Exchange ...for
more help, though, try posting in an Outlook newsgroup.

(NB: I believe that SBS may be a special case but if you're using that, try
posting in an SBS group).

Users are not receiving email when reply due to a unusual address

Posted: 30 Jun 2008 08:46 AM PDT

People who don't cut themselves don't need band-aids. Proper migration
planning and execution helps obviate post-migration problems.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"CK" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange 2003 test restore of Mailboxes

Posted: 29 Jun 2008 08:02 AM PDT

Well, you said:
 

An Exchange-aware backup and restore doesn't ask you to back up or restore
files by name.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"Deb H" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Local/Server Size difference

Posted: 28 Jun 2008 05:34 PM PDT

Sorry for not including more details.

I have one FE and one BE server, each running Exchange 2003SP2.

All clients are running Outlook 2003 in cached mode with the exception of a
few network administrators (self included) running Outlook 2007.

I first saw this problem on my mailbox. I solved it by moving all my mail
into a PST and then moving it all back. I am now seeing it on several
users- a more than 200mb deltak between their local and their server mailbox
size. Each folder has a delta, and the larger the folder, the larger the
delta.

I tried using PFDAVADMIN but I got an error that the connection timed out
when I tried to view objects under "inbox".

Also, do you know what causes this? It hasn't been a problem (at least
visibly) for the last few years and nothing has really changed in terms of
antivirus, server role, etc.

Any advice would be appreciated.

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Moving exchange to a new server

Posted: 27 Jun 2008 04:53 PM PDT

Ari wrote: 

What version of Outlook? Did you change anything on the client? Do not
create a new profile, do not do ANYTHING to Outlook at the client. The
client will auto-redirect.

Venger

Exchange 2007 Address Lists and Outlook 2007 Address Book not upda

Posted: 27 Jun 2008 02:23 PM PDT

Thanks for everyone's help.

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

error moving mailboxes

Posted: 27 Jun 2008 12:17 PM PDT

I rarely reboot my exchange servers because my users are spoiled and think
they can't do without it, but this morning I rebooted the ex2000 server that
I was trying to move mb's from and was then able to move the mailboxes.

Sometimes all it really does take is a reboot.

Thanks for your help!

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

GAL Synchronizaton Issue with ILM2007

Posted: 27 Jun 2008 09:44 AM PDT

You might get better help from an ILM newsgroup.
--
Ed Crowley
MVP - Exchange
"Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!"

"Manuel" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

how to monitor user's incoming or outgoing email ?

Posted: 26 Jun 2008 01:13 AM PDT

Hi there Steven,
Read this:
http://www.mchange.org/tutorials/Sender-Recipient-Filtering.html

I was referred to it today with a question I asked but it also has a little
section about intercepting mail.
Scroll down to the Sender Filtering section and read it all

Kind Regards,
Patrick S

"steven" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Exchange Blackhole

Posted: 25 Jun 2008 06:23 PM PDT

Hi there,
Thanks very much for that-works a charm-The error is now sent from their
post master my exchange server's now

Thanks and Regards,
Patrick Squire



"Martin Blackstone" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Windows Mobile email issue

Posted: 24 Jun 2008 11:51 AM PDT

John,

I have checked the IIS logging file and did some testing. The following are
the testing that I did:

1. Receving a normal email.

2. Receiving a VM notification email.

After receiving both of the above, I looked at the IIS log and compared the
two logs. The two logs are identical, except for the fact that the VM
notification email log has a few extra lines at the beginning of the log,
which is the following:

2008-06-30 21:30:26 192.168.3.5 UNSUBSCRIBE
/ExchDAV/com/ - 80 PACER\user1 192.168.3.5
Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/6.5.7638.1 207 0 0

2008-06-30 21:30:26 192.168.3.5 POST /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync
User=user1&DeviceId=0B4A738CDB9C80D1B7745EB69FF4AB E6&DeviceType=PocketPC&Cmd=Ping&Log=V4TNASNC:0A0C0 D0FS:0A0C0D0SP:1C17I37497S2309356R0S0L900H0P
443 domainname\user1 166.190.32.5 MSFT-PPC/5.2.404 200 0 0



As I have mentioned previously, I used Treo 650 (with Good Mobile Messaging)
and did not have this problem, but I have not tried using ActiveSync with
any other device. The provider does not think that it is a problem on their
end, and I am also not sure if it is or not at this point.





TIA,

Alex



"John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
news:com...