Mail header - Microsoft Exchange |
- Mail header
- No complete IMF install with SP2
- Exchange mbx, hub and cas combinig issue
- A farce - the Microsoft Action Pack Subscription licence agreement
- Exchange unable to relay
- 2 mailbox servers need OWA to both
- Viewing Free Busy with Outlook 2007
- Exchange 2007 POP3 clients double read receipts
- Address Literals
- Single server to multiple servers
| Posted: 10 Mar 2008 01:23 AM PDT look at the display names in active directory. -- Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook] Author, Teach Yourself Outlook 2003 in 24 Hours Need Help with Common Tasks? http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/ Outlook 2007: http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/ Outlook Tips by email: outlooktips.net Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/ Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook newsletter: EASE.LSOFT.COM "filip" <fmatosic@@inet.hr> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
| No complete IMF install with SP2 Posted: 09 Mar 2008 09:58 AM PDT I think I got it fixed. I still need to do some testing. I re-ran the SP2 install using /forestprep and /domainprep. The schema extensions are there now. I see the UCE Archive folder, which I changed via the registry. I'll watch to make sure spam gets filtered. Thanks for your help. Steve Gould "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... |
| Exchange mbx, hub and cas combinig issue Posted: 09 Mar 2008 12:06 AM PST I'm sure that I put in Enterprise key, and also when right click on that server's in Console it stands that it is Enterprise. When I created 6th database on that server, Information Store service stopped working and in Application events showed up event saying that Information store cannot run because there is more that maximum number of databases. Btw, OS is windows 2008 Enterprise and Exchange 2007 SP1 enteprise. Really strange. any ideas? |
| A farce - the Microsoft Action Pack Subscription licence agreement Posted: 07 Mar 2008 08:58 PM PST So pay and quit whining! -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "HotmailUser" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 07 Mar 2008 03:22 PM PST In the SMTP Virtual Server properties, enable relaying for authenticated users only. Configure your non-MAPI clients to authenticate using the same credentials as they do for POP or IMAP. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "James" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| 2 mailbox servers need OWA to both Posted: 07 Mar 2008 02:45 PM PST If the hostnames and domains are the same and your firewall is open for that server then redirection should work. A front-end server cannot host mailboxes. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "tke402" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Viewing Free Busy with Outlook 2007 Posted: 07 Mar 2008 12:12 PM PST To have free-busy data for the Exchange 2003 users, I believe you should have a public store on your Exchange 2007 server and you should create s on it for the free-busy system public folders. When you're native Exchange 2007 and Outlook 2007 in your organization, I believe that you will no longer have to have the public folders. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "osiexchange" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Exchange 2007 POP3 clients double read receipts Posted: 07 Mar 2008 04:40 AM PST I'm not saying you're wrong, but are you sure that the first isn't a delivery receipt? -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "Manuel" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 06 Mar 2008 01:53 PM PST . Unfortunately. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:com... |
| Single server to multiple servers Posted: 02 Mar 2008 09:35 PM PST OK, good, thanks. Here goes the $64M question..... if I have more than one HT and more than one edge, should I have an instance of EdgeSync for each possible pairing, or one instance for each pair? I thought I had read on a blog it is better to set up Edgesync between each pair of HT/Edge. For example, I have 2 Edge, 2 HT - should I create 2 instances of EdgeSync, or 4? "Henry" wrote: |
| You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
