Pages

Search

Exchange 2003 and best memory practices - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2003 and best memory practices - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2003 and best memory practices

Posted: 30 Apr 2007 07:44 AM PDT

Is that where instead you just make the switch a /NOPAE in boot.ini or do you
have to do an other switches? Here is an article stating though that PAE is
OK.? This is why I am unsure which to use.

Microsoft have reversed their policy/recomendation on the use of the /NOPAE
switch in the boot.ini file of servers running Windows 2003 with Exchange
2003.
Microsoft's previous policy/recomendation was to set the /NOPAE switch in
the boot.ini of servers running Windows 2003 with Exchange 2003. The Exchange
Server Team have now found no issues running the PAE kernel or running with
DEP enabled on these setups.


"John Fullbright" wrote:
 

Security Issue/Question

Posted: 27 Apr 2007 09:12 PM PDT

Sweet dreams, Brian....

j. ;-)


Brian P. Hammer wrote: 

Mail Server Host Name in Greeting

Posted: 27 Apr 2007 11:06 AM PDT

Thanks Mitch that worked. While I was in the delivery dialogue box, I also
set the external DNS server address to the ISP DNS server address for our
iSP. It was previously blank. Is that the correct thing to do? Should I
also click on the perform a reverse dns lookup check box?

"Mitch Roberson" wrote:
 

Sending Message - Access denied

Posted: 27 Apr 2007 04:44 AM PDT

HI! Thanks for the info. I searched about the policy, but I did not found any
policy about that. But, where can I configure this policy? Best regards Stefan


"Evar" wrote:
 

Hide an exchange policy from address books

Posted: 27 Apr 2007 03:02 AM PDT

You can't hide the addresses that are listed on the address tab. Once it
is in the email addresses list, then its visible, as far as I know.

com wrote: 

database removal and restoration.

Posted: 26 Apr 2007 11:06 AM PDT

Kevin <microsoft.com> wrote: 

I second the "third party" recommendation. I'm a big fan of Quest's Recovery
Manager for Exchange.....they have an eval you can download. Get offline
copies of the .edb & .stm files, and you can mount them in Quest, browse
through them, get items/mailboxes/folders out to PST files or another
Exchange server, etc.

Exchange 2003: Any way of getting a break down on the size, type, date range, etc of email attachments stored?

Posted: 26 Apr 2007 04:17 AM PDT

Thanks guys.

The trial version of Message Stats can be downloaded here:

http://www.quest.com/2_0/registration.aspx?requestdefid=7919

QH



On 26 Apr, 14:36, "John Fullbright" <fjohn@donotspamenetappdotcom>
wrote: 

exchange 2007 on longhorn

Posted: 25 Apr 2007 06:34 PM PDT

In article <phx.gbl>,
"seth" <net> wrote:
 

Nope, it's not supported in SP1 beta.

Cheers,
-Paul

SPF Record

Posted: 25 Apr 2007 05:32 PM PDT

Thanks Bharat, I think that I see the light now!

Tom



"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
 

MX Record At ISP

Posted: 25 Apr 2007 03:10 PM PDT

Thanks Steve, that did it. I no longer have the mx problem or the SPF problem!

"Steve Antonio [MSFT]" wrote:
 

big problem with meeting invitations since we moved to exchange 20

Posted: 25 Apr 2007 03:56 AM PDT

On the hub transport.


"???? ?" <com.unneeded> wrote in message
news:com... 

disappearing e-mail

Posted: 25 Apr 2007 02:02 AM PDT

See if there are restrictions to whom can send or receive from the DL

"Han" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Sharepoint 2007

Posted: 24 Apr 2007 07:44 AM PDT

Thanks for the replies.

Does this mean there is no way at all to get around the limitation. My
client isn't large enough to justify two seperate servers but is completely
sold on the Sharepoint ideals.

On a related note does anyone know if SBS 2007(8?) will include Sharepoint
in some format?

Thanks

Ian.

"Steve Antonio [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Imap for outlook 2003, sbs 2003

Posted: 24 Apr 2007 05:00 AM PDT

Hi there,

Thanks for the confirmation.

So I am back to square one with imap. Or are there any other choices that
would be a possibility ?

If Imap is my only choice and so far I don't think it is permission problem
as nothing had been added or alter in the server or in client m/c. Network
problem ---??? When I do the send and received, the send and received have
not report any error at all. If it is network problem, I would have expect
error when send and received. Unless my understanding on the send and
received were wrong. Well it definitely doesn't have problem when sending as
it is sending though the very building which I am in and I had tested the
sending was still ok yesterday. It is the receiving which has the problem. I
have just check with OWA that the message I sent yesterday and the day
before still not getting to the administrator mailbox. Yes that was the
account I was doing my testing on.

I shall removed the account and set it up again and see whether the same
thing happened. So I might 'disappear' for some day before I give a feed
back.

Have a good day guys


"Peter O'Dowd (MVP)" <com> wrote in message
news:eFVM$phx.gbl... 

no free/busy info for users

Posted: 24 Apr 2007 05:00 AM PDT

i have tried with one user and I imediately see his free/busy status.
thank you.

"Steve Antonio [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Applications to Support Newsletter Publishing

Posted: 23 Apr 2007 11:02 PM PDT

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:09:29 -0700, Will wrote in
microsoft.public.exchange.misc, microsoft.public.exchange.applications:
 
[snip] 
[snip] 
[snip]

I'm pretty sure that Microsoft Word/Outlook can send a single
uncustomized message/attachment, iow a newsletter, to many recipients by
generating a message for each. I'm similarly sure that this approach is
not the most effective or even convenient way of doing this. I would use
a command line mailer.

--
Michael Bednarek http://mbednarek.com/ "POST NO BILLS"

Exchange 2007 OWA: Embedded link block

Posted: 23 Apr 2007 04:15 AM PDT

Hi Torben,

Thanks for updating.

It's my pleasure help you,

If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Have a nice weekend.

Best Regards,

Robert Li(MSFT)

Microsoft Online Support
Microsoft Global Technical Support Center

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
================================================== ===
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
================================================== ===
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.