Pages

Search

Duplicate Email - Microsoft Exchange

Duplicate Email - Microsoft Exchange

Duplicate Email

Posted: 12 Dec 2006 12:16 PM PST

Verify the user has no Outlook Rules that me casuing this.

--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner

"u45106" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Immediate NDR bounces back

Posted: 09 Dec 2006 03:03 AM PST

this problem is occuring once in a blue moon.....may be it is working
fine when selecting the recipients from the TO tab....i was only
curious to know where the problem was...or why is it hapenning..

Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: 

Bizarre Problem mails are delivered over and over again

Posted: 08 Dec 2006 01:03 PM PST

Cheerio Lanwench,

no POP-connector in use here. Just plain SMTP traffic to our ISP`s mail
server. My firewall`s a MS ISA 2004 Server, redirecting port 25 to the
internal SBS/Exchange 2003. How does the NIC`s speed and duplex setting
affect (random multiple) delivery of emails?? I never heard this before but
I`m giving it a try. As I said, I´m out of ideas beside stopping Trend-Micro
services on this machine. Thanks for your help anyway, it`s greatly
appreciated!

Cheers,
Michael

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:%23nc$phx.gbl... 

Frontend Server for OWA

Posted: 07 Dec 2006 09:09 PM PST

Ooops, my bad. Didn't pay enough attention to that.
So yes, the OP will need to prevent access to the FE from users on the
Internet. This would be best achieved with ISA and an access list
allowing group member in and denying access to other group members.

[OT] Recomendations/experiences

Posted: 07 Dec 2006 08:51 AM PST

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:42:01 +0100, "filip" <hr> wrote:
 

If you have Exchange Standard Edition then you can only have 75GB for
the mailbox store which is the same number as the ssame thing as "all
mailboxes"
 

Enterprise Edition, which gives you 20 stores, each of which are
unlimited in size. 
Having PST files open on the network is the bad thing.
 

continuously memory increase on front end server

Posted: 06 Dec 2006 08:43 AM PST

Well that answer has the same effect of leading one towards Exchange
itself rather than merely IIS.
Good idea to check all the build states for SP level and pathes.
Post the numbers back here if you need and someone might be able to
look through them and point you to an out of date something or other,
be it Exchange or IIS.

Mailbox Logoff time

Posted: 06 Dec 2006 08:39 AM PST

I'm with Peter on this one. Either the customer wants to listen to
reason or they don't.
Exactly what on earth is their problem? You can start the mailbox move
with them logged on or you can force them to log off. Once the mailbox
has been moved they can have a standing instruction for people to log
off their PCs and back on again.
You've wasted so much of your own time (not mine because I'm in here
anyway) on trying to find a solution for the customer because the two
(I'm sure you'd already thought of) methods are unacceptable is daft.

Sync OWA and Outlook 2003 After restore

Posted: 05 Dec 2006 07:03 PM PST

I tested as you suggested and it worked out OK using a new .OST file on the
client. I think my troubles were caused by the cached messages in the OST.
That file had to be recreated by using your method, a new profile with a new
name. Thanks a million for your help - Aidan

"SolveIT" wrote:
 

Is there an easy way to get a list of all e-mail addresses serviced by an exchange server?

Posted: 05 Dec 2006 10:09 AM PST

Thank you!

"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <spam.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Cannot Reconnect mailbox

Posted: 04 Dec 2006 09:46 AM PST

I was thinking you could recover from the Offsite server System State since
it probably has not been replicated yet. In any event, I find it odd you
cannot reconnect the mailbox to any account. Sounds like the mailbox might
still have an account or guid associated with it.

--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2007
Microsoft Certified Partner

<com> wrote in message
news:googlegroups.com... 

Help, I moved mailboxes and now can open boxes using "Service account admin" rights

Posted: 04 Dec 2006 08:56 AM PST

Okay,

It looks like I have it working for now. It seems that the "group" that I
gave "Service accout" admin rights to is not working on the "moved" DBs for
some reason. Even though the group is on the security tab with "full"
rights.

I went ahead and just added my AD account the the security tab and gave it
"full" rights and everything started working. If anyone has any ideas on
how to get the group working again that would be great. I will try (at a
later time) to delete the group from those DBs and re-add the group and is
if that fixes that problem.

Thanks for everyone's help.


Clayton



"Clayton Sutton" <com> wrote in message
news:JKYch.372452$news.easynews.com... 

5.7.1 error on only 1 user

Posted: 04 Dec 2006 08:10 AM PST

Thanks for info, problem was MailSweeper not relaying .co.uk mails. Added
and all fine now.

Cheers

"Pablo Pecanto" <org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

OWA to POP, IMAP: OWA access, need pop3, IMAP, or Forwarding

Posted: 04 Dec 2006 07:16 AM PST

If you had access to the Administrators I might suggest that they
delete your mailbox and instead create a mail enabled contact that
pointed to your Exchange account.

IE 7 with Exchange 2003 SP2

Posted: 04 Dec 2006 01:03 AM PST

In news:phx.gbl,
news.microsoft.com <com> typed: 

Not specifically, but why on earth are they putting IE7 on this server to
begin with? Nobody should be doing any web surfing on this box anyway. If
removing IE7 fixes the problem, I'd say that's good enough to go with for
now. I don't put IE7 on my clients' desktops yet, let alone a server. I
wouldn't mind if I could take IE off my servers entirely, to be honest.

PS: No need to crosspost to quite so many groups. Most people subscribe to
multiple groups and you will get plenty of 'eyes' seeing your message if you
pick a small handful of relevant groups to post your message in. 

Inbound SMTP Problem

Posted: 01 Dec 2006 02:53 AM PST

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
 

It's not that the service stops... everything appears fine but the mail
doesn't flow. Stopping the service is a problem as it doesn't stop in a
timely fashion.


Tim

NAS header in message body

Posted: 28 Nov 2006 10:02 AM PST

Fredly <com> wrote:
 

Someone sent them an ill-formed message.
--
Brian Tillman

EMAILS WITH UNDISCLOSED RECEPIENTS

Posted: 28 Nov 2006 06:49 AM PST

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:03:00 -0800, "Ed Crowley [MVP]"
<org> wrote:
 

Agreed. But it's still troublesome enough to have it's own KB article
that's about the same length as War & Peace. It's troublesome enough
for it to appear in here ever single damn day.
For the sake of fifty Euro's (what's that these days, about six
dollars?) a new POP3 connector for people that don't have the option
of going SMTP is a price worth paying.

where are wombats?

Posted: 27 Nov 2006 05:02 PM PST

net wrote: 
know anyone who eats roots shoots and leaves?

rb