Disabling user accounts best practice - Microsoft Exchange |
- Disabling user accounts best practice
- E2K3 SP2 Issues?
- Undeliverable System Administrator NDR, Spam or Virus?
- Exchange ActiveSync on a Single Server
- Max number mail boxes
- Ex2K3/ISA 2004 - Enabling Active Sync - Motorola Q
- smtp log but not received in inbox
- Delivery and Read reciept
- DNS forward lookup zone "local"
- Installing MS06-019
- Cannot add email addresses to some sites with different OUs
- Problem setting up Query-based Distribution Groups
Disabling user accounts best practice Posted: 17 May 2006 02:01 PM PDT Joe, no need to be rude when soliciting help, you might get "blackballed". What Mark is trying to say is that Microsoft base most of their recommendations on the theory, while most of the responses you will get here are from the practical. Persons who have actually encountered your situation or concern in the real world situation and have not encountered the theoretical issues that MS mentioned. Maybe the reason you are unable to find any MS articles on the matter is that it might be a MS engineer on the phone rambling. I would take real world experience over theory any day. I have not personally experience any noticeable performance hit for deleted accounts. HATH = Hope All That/This Helps Joe wrote: |
Posted: 17 May 2006 12:01 PM PDT While Nick and Mark, work on their beers, which I hope is a Red Stripe from Jamaica :), you should also uninstall IMF v1 (if implemented) before installing SP2 or you will have issues with it now working after the installation. HATH = Hope All That/This Helps Fred Yarbrough wrote: |
Undeliverable System Administrator NDR, Spam or Virus? Posted: 16 May 2006 03:43 PM PDT Thanks for your suggestions John. I will read through both the links you provided. Can you explain to me how spammers performing dictionary attacks on my domain show up as NDRs when I use Exchange to send and receive my email but not when I collect my email via outlook? Regards Chris "John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" wrote: |
Exchange ActiveSync on a Single Server Posted: 16 May 2006 03:24 PM PDT Really not much is needed. The default Exchange 2003 installation (and upgrade to SP2) allows for Exchange ActiveSync out-of-the-box. It should just be the case of generating your own certificate (or purchasing one), distributing to the Windows Mobile devices and creating the partnership (either by connecting to ActiveSync on a PC or by changing the ActiveSync configuration on your Pocket PC). -- Mauricio Freitas www.geekzone.co.nz, www.geekzone.co.nz/freitasm, www.geekzone.co.nz/geekzoneblog.asp Software for Pocket PC: www.geekzone.co.nz/store Microsoft MVP Mobile Devices "Nicolas Macarez" <fr> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 16 May 2006 01:48 PM PDT Thaks for the responses, I was thinking it was not a number thing but my boss was looking for a magical mailbox number limit. Thanks again. "Kirrin Jones" wrote: |
Ex2K3/ISA 2004 - Enabling Active Sync - Motorola Q Posted: 16 May 2006 11:38 AM PDT Thank you very much Eric. We don't have a device yet but the vice president of our company is going to purchase the Motorola Q when it comes out hopefully next week. "Eric Hicks [MVP]" <i'with.u> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
smtp log but not received in inbox Posted: 16 May 2006 09:35 AM PDT Correction that's my "...\MAILROOT\VSI 1\UCEARCHIVE". "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 16 May 2006 01:17 AM PDT Hmm.. i think u misunderstand my point . We realise that when we put one more layer be it anti spam or email proxy infront of the email exchange . It will generate this kind of notification message already . So we find that the message is quit confusing . Because we want a delivery reciept but you respond that message relayed to other party . So how do i know whether my mail has been deliver to correct party already or not ? We know that it difficult to track the email . But i think it should generate a proper notification rather than "relay" and it not my problem . Nowaday seldom ppl put exchange as first layer already . So if this function cant work well with the today technology . It believe it need to be redesign again . "Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote: |
DNS forward lookup zone "local" Posted: 15 May 2006 01:05 PM PDT Hi, You should use the DNS servers from your ISP as forwarders (if that is part of your agreement with them). Leif "RickyVene" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 15 May 2006 07:47 AM PDT "Danny Sanders" <com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... Try that first. Many times something hangs in the background and you just don't know. So this is a great method and often a huge time saver. |
Cannot add email addresses to some sites with different OUs Posted: 15 May 2006 07:33 AM PDT No, there aren't any filters. There is a default policy, but nothing has been added. "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
Problem setting up Query-based Distribution Groups Posted: 12 May 2006 01:50 PM PDT I appreciate the response however, I am still unsuccessful with the LDAP query. Here is more information- Global/Security Group - Accounting (5 members) Going through the QBDG wizard here is what I'm inputing: Name/Alias - Accounting Apply Filter to recieptients in and below: DOMAIN.loc/ Filter: (Customized) Find: Exchange Recipients In: Entire Domain TABS- General: "Users with Exchange mailbox" checked Storage: "Mailboxes on any server" Advanced: Field: User > Member of... Condition: Is (Exactly)... Value: Accounting Find Now - Returns nothing This and the previous way I queried failed to return anything. Any ideas? TIA! "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote: |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |