Pages

Search

Need to convert an .OST file into a .PST file. - Microsoft Exchange

Need to convert an .OST file into a .PST file. - Microsoft Exchange

Need to convert an .OST file into a .PST file.

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 11:20 AM PDT

Like Henry said, if you end up with an OST file and no mail profile
that it belongs to then your OST is effectively screwed. Well, the OST
isn't screwed but the fact that there's no MAPI profile means that
it's no longer of any use in it's current form.

Yes, that happens, with depressing regularity!

Exchange 2003 problem. What is the answer?

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 11:12 AM PDT

Is it at all possible the vendor's DNS systems have an outdated MX record?
By this I mean did you ever have your MX set to nameremoved.com even though
it is now set to the IP of mail.nameremoved.com?


--
_____________________________
Mike Talon
yahoo.com.nospam

Every Exchange Engineer upon hearing they're not
getting the absolute best performance on their
Exchange Server:

"Oh look, a hornets' nest. . .WHACK WHACK WHACK!"

"Tom Bokman" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
have 
has 
server 

Single user cannot receive email...

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 08:35 AM PDT

Well, that's changed (I think)
The first post said that anyone at domain 1 could send to anyone in
domain 2 except JDoe who could send to everyone in domain 2 except
JaneDoe.

Now you say that more people are not receiving messages from domain 1?

I'd have a check on domain 2 to make sure that Jane Doe didn't get
married and change her smtp address (or something else along those
lines). Next thing is for us to understand how JaneDoe got into the
GAL on domain 1, who put it in there (as an AD Contact) or what sync
software are you using (if any)

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:32:05 -0700, "Phil T."
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

Sender IP must resolve

Posted: 29 Apr 2005 02:42 AM PDT

Thank you for your reply. I thought it might be DNS related. Why can't the
Exchange server in "the other end" resolve our IP? It is public and an
MX-record is pointing it directly to our mailserver. Is it not something they
can do with their mail server? I really do not want to change my Exchange
configuration just for this one domain.

Regards

Paal Berg

"Johan Strange" wrote:
 

Exchange and DNS

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 12:16 PM PDT

Our Exchange server is windows 2003 with exchange 2003 pack 1. We have it out
on the DMZ so that our employees can access it through the web. The only port
we have open to it is 80. It is not a domain controller, just an exchange
server. If I were to cut the connection to a domain controller for even 30
seconds, we would have to reboot in order for the exchange services to
restart. Is that normal ?

"Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" wrote:
 

Import pst's to new Exchange 2003 box

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 10:44 AM PDT

Taj Lloyd Munson wrote: 

You are most welcome!
 
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=429163EC-DCDF-47DC-96DA-1C12D67327D5&displaylang=en

Access Database in Public Folder? E2K3

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 10:23 AM PDT

this requires development experience though doesn't it?


"Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" <spambegone.net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Problem w/ Exchange Databases on Storage Server NAS

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 06:30 AM PDT

Microsoft support policy on the use of network-attached storage devices with
Exchange Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/839687

You may want to have a look at this article.

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Also, the use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified
at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm



"Chris Hota (MCSE2003)" <ualr.edu> wrote in message
news:%23mzL0Z$phx.gbl... 

Send email using two different domains one server

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 05:48 AM PDT

Thanks for the response. I have done some digging and did not come up with
anything more than your suggestions. I will probably just create some new
accounts. Currently there are only two users that need this capability.

Thanks again!

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
 

Messages sometimes in english and sometimes in german

Posted: 28 Apr 2005 12:22 AM PDT

No hint...
it seems i must open a call at microsoft support.

"Markus Spätling" wrote:
 

I couldn't find any host by that name

Posted: 27 Apr 2005 03:55 PM PDT

Johan,

Thank you for your response, Might have figure it out, The login name did
not match the name in Exchange.

The bounce back is a folows :
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<com>:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host by that name. (#4.1.2)
I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <com>
Received: (qmail 72474 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Apr 2005 15:35:48 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;

b=h5yKsV4LlxMyCJx+oFkJ2bM+V+uATnVnDiSC0i5QTDrL9Zao HXIR6YziiLzXB/JhulA0ktZ4+TdwUJZTdPi4TAWijXNFa7M9tHpbzQjXpkcbT0e0/nQzczGSQTcTepzbVbxpZlyLM8GQuE9RTD+e+5ATcf5FlrBouoi 86CgtY+E= ;
Message-ID: <mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.224.21.59] by web60323.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26
Apr 2005 08:35:48 PDT
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kim Koster <com>
Subject: Emailing: A_AB384_324
To: Paul Smith <com>,
Paul Smith <com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-280134316-1114529748=:71485"

--0-280134316-1114529748=:71485
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1762125406-1114529748=:71485"

--0-1762125406-1114529748=:71485
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
A_AB384_324 Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may
prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your
e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.


Timo


"Johan Strange" wrote:
 

Removal of Exchange account in Outlook

Posted: 27 Apr 2005 08:48 AM PDT

Andy wrote: 

Hi, Andy - I replied in another group. Please don't multipost - if you need
to post to
multiple groups, it's best to crosspost instead, by posting a single message
to a handful of relevant groups (separate the NG names with commas) so that
everyone can follow the thread. This makes it easier for everyone, including
you.

Best Way to Forward Email?

Posted: 27 Apr 2005 08:16 AM PDT

Hi Fred,
I assume you got the answer to your issue.I swa your post and thought you
would be the right person to suggest me some tips on my migration.
By chance on some terms i am in the same environment exchange 5.5+ exchange
2003 and about to go for move mailbox for mailbox migration. I have tested
this scenario in the test lab and things are working.I need to aks your
advice on a couple of things,
I read somewhere that after ADC synchs the AD and Exchange databases and you
move some mailboxes over to the new exchange server, to have mail going
smoothly between the migrated ones and the ones which are still on 5.5
server.you have to tweak in ADC connection to create contacts/external email
addresses on 5.5 for the migrated mailboxes? please advice

Secondly,
If you wanna share any tips which i should be keeping in mind during the
move would be Greatly appreciated.
thanks

"Fred Yarbrough" wrote:
 

Exchange 2003 SP1 and Windows 2003 SP1

Posted: 27 Apr 2005 07:55 AM PDT

"Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" <spambegone.net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Thanks. Exchange SP1 has gone well this morning.

Is it correct that Windows 2003 DCs need to be upgraded first, and is it
possible to run the upgrade on a remote server using Remote Desktop?


Tim

Archiving emails using Exchange Manager

Posted: 26 Apr 2005 06:38 AM PDT

Thanks, I look forward to hearing from you



"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Removing last Exchange 5.5 server.

Posted: 25 Apr 2005 07:24 PM PDT

Mark, Thanks for your help but I still don't have the answers I'm looking for.

The SRS server will be phased out. The only reason it was installed on a
separate server was because the ADC can't run on a server that is a member of
the cluster.

KB152960 states the following:

Changing the Routing Calculation Server

The routing calculation server is defined on the Site Addressing object for
each site. If you fail to define a new server after deleting the routing
calculation server, Exchange will automatically discover the problem and
select another server, but this may take several hours or longer. In the
meantime, routing information may become out of date.

This is the reason why we have to choose a Routing Calculation Server
ourselves as we can’t afford to be down for “several hours”

When we choose the Exchange 5.5 Site Addressing to assign the roll to a
different server is shows all servers, including the Virtual Servers from the
Cluster.

So my question still remains:
Which would be the best choice for transferring the Site Addressing to:
A Front-end server, a Back-end server? They both have an option to configure
the Recipient Policy (Which I believe takes the place ot the Exchange 5.5
Site Addressing)

As for the second question:
Which would be the best server for the Routing Master Roll:
A Front-end server, a Back-end server? They both can be the Routing Master.

I hope you can answer these two questions for me.

Thanks
Hans


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: