Link Lines are not Visible Microsoft Project |
- Link Lines are not Visible
- 2nd Request - Resource Assignment
- Project Compare Formulas
- Reference book
- notes stored in .mdb when converted from projects
- creating report to see how many resources are allocated monthly
- Duration question
- Difference between Project Standard 2003 and "academic" version??
- Writing PDF using MS Project '98!!!
- View MS Project file without MS Project
- Lnking to give a latest start date
Posted: 02 Nov 2004 08:57 AM PST Glenn, Yes, go to Format/Layout. I just noted that in Project 2003 at least, no link lines is the default. Hope this helps. John |
2nd Request - Resource Assignment Posted: 02 Nov 2004 08:56 AM PST Yes, you can use a single resource pool. All project files point to same file holding the resources. Fully discussed in Help and in most book on Project. Best you read it about it there rather try to repeat here. Hope this is useful to you. Let us know. rms tonik wrote: |
Posted: 01 Nov 2004 07:11 PM PST You'ld be right if we were talking work. -- -Jack ... For project information and macro examples visit http://masamiki.com/project .. "Steve House [MVP]" <send.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... forgot the them. project |
Posted: 01 Nov 2004 09:43 AM PST Amazon often have parts of the book , the index and contents available online to view. Try their site Regards DavidC "JulieD" wrote: |
notes stored in .mdb when converted from projects Posted: 01 Nov 2004 08:12 AM PST Sorry, should have mentioned that in my code i had Set rsb=db.openrecordset("MSP_TASKS",dbopendynaset) "mxiong" wrote: |
creating report to see how many resources are allocated monthly Posted: 01 Nov 2004 05:54 AM PST Hi AngePaton, Glad to hear the toolbar is now working. Did the export to Excel show you what you wanted to see? Julie "AngePaton" wrote: |
Posted: 30 Oct 2004 02:17 PM PDT Cool. Good catch. Didn't think of that. rms John wrote: |
Difference between Project Standard 2003 and "academic" version?? Posted: 30 Oct 2004 01:55 PM PDT It is my understanding of the standard academic license for Microsoft products do not permit upgrades. I presume this enforced in software. I don't have it to check for you. Best you read the EULA for other restrictions that may get in you way. I gotta mention, though, that even though on your home computer, you are still when you install the software agreeing to licensing terms. Hope this is useful to you. Let us know. rms warren_ds wrote: |
Writing PDF using MS Project '98!!! Posted: 30 Oct 2004 07:44 AM PDT Change the device to Ne02 or Ne03 instead of the c:\documents etc etc. "a.k." wrote: |
View MS Project file without MS Project Posted: 29 Oct 2004 07:32 AM PDT Hi, another option is to save the plan as a WebPage - this is included as part of the version of MSProject we use at work. Using this you can filter to display only the columns (or rows) that will be interest to those needing read only access. To do this, Save as Webpage and follow the steps in the wizard. Cheers Carly "Gregory Hunt" wrote: |
Lnking to give a latest start date Posted: 28 Oct 2004 03:17 PM PDT I guess it must be the overall complexity of the plan I am doing. I have basically seven units each having the essentially the same activities and logic with the units being sequential. There are three different contractors working on a unit. One contrator's (c1) work is such that it can start at the start of the outage or any time up to a period where if the work starts any later it would not finish no later than 3 weeks before the start of another contractor's (c2) work on that unit. Using the method described, leaves the start activity for C1's work at the earliest possible start time, but if I change it to sart as late as possible it then works back from the end of the project which can be six units away and the start of C1's work for a unit ends up years away from where it should be. The activity needs to start as late as possible in respect only of that unit not the whole project. Hence the reason why I have installed a 3 week lag behind the start of the relevant activity for c2 on the unit, plus the overall duration of c1's work to give me the latest start date. Where I would then need to modify the lag is if on subsequent units the durations drop through efficiencies and better processes then the start date for c1 could change accordingly and I would then need to re do the duration of c1's work. Basically I want the start of C2's activity to 'push' the last activity of c1 back 3 weeks from it's start, and then all the previous activities for c1 would then 'push' back to give the latest start date. I am sure I have done it in Projectview, and I certainly used to do it on tracing paper back in the seventies. It could be done using each unit as a project plan in it's own right and then creating a master submaster plan, but have had difficulties with that method where the plan is on the clients server, but then download it to my laptop and work on the plan from elsewhere then try to replace the plan back on the server. Or the client changes the directory for parts of the plan. either way the links get lost and confused, so I have settled for one plan for all the units. As I understand the process of assigning "As late as possible" on a task it calculates the start date from the end of the project date and not from the next task. It has me baffled still. I did try as you suggested and in the predecessor for T1 put T2FS-21d but that did not shift T2 forward, but rather left it some weeks prior to the start of T1. Regards DavidC "Steve House [MVP]" wrote: |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Project To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |