Small Business Server - Forums Linux |
- Small Business Server
- su login: takes long time
- AMD's Athlon64 or Intel's P4?
- Linux 2.4.18; can't `chmod 777 /floppy`
- Hard Drive Setup
- Is there a way to set an environment variable (for the parent shell) through a bash script???
- which port/version to load
- Moving Partitions - hitch
- LVM partition
- su premission problem
Posted: 14 Sep 2004 06:43 AM PDT On 14 Sep 2004 06:43:38 -0700, Tavish Muldoon <com> wrote: Every Linux distro has most of these features. -- If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests? (Think about it) |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 10:48 PM PDT On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 05:48:52 GMT, Kelli <com> wrote: What is in root's .login, .profile or other startup scripts? Does your system use NIS, LDAP, or just /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow? Are there any NFS mounts? -- If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests? (Think about it) |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 05:50 PM PDT <com> wrote in message news:net... While AMD-64 is really nifty, especially for server class applications, it's not really accessible yet to most game software. So the clock speed winds up dominating a lot of that performance. For this year at least, consider using Xeon's on a dual-CPU capable board and add the second CPU later if you need it. Hyperthreading on CPU's is useful for some applications, but also still over-vaunted. |
Linux 2.4.18; can't `chmod 777 /floppy` Posted: 13 Sep 2004 11:55 AM PDT In article <acm>, Alan Mackenzie wrote: man mount Not the greatest idea, but whatever. When you mount something, there, the something is going to modify those permissions. It's the default. See that mount man page, and look at the 'mode' option. This would go into the /etc/fstab. You might also be interested in the 'user', "uid", and 'gid' options, but maybe not. Is the floppy using a Unix style filesystem that understands those permissions and ownership? Seems so. Did you think to look at http://groups.google.com - this one does turn up pretty frequent ;-) Old guy |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 11:41 AM PDT Are you using ext2 filesystems? If you are, the resize2fs (see "man resize2fs") can be used in conjunction with fdisk to modify a disk partition and its filesystem information. Be aware that a mistake can pretty much hose everything. To grow a partition, first use fdisk to change the ending address of the partition to a higher value, then use resize2fs to make the filesystem information conform. To shrink a partition, first use resize2fs to change the filesystem information to the desired smaller size, then use fdisk to change the ending address of the partition to the corresponding lower value. This method is limited in that only the *end* of the partition can be changed. The start of the partition has to remain fixed. |
Is there a way to set an environment variable (for the parent shell) through a bash script??? Posted: 13 Sep 2004 10:14 AM PDT Andreas Janssen said the following, on 09/13/04 13:47: It is not possible for any process to set the environment of its parent. I think you mean to run: .. ./test.sh At least, that's what works in bash. This works because the initial '.' tells the (current) shell to read and execute the lines in './try.sh' as input to the current shell process. (BTW, it is a perfectly natural habit to call things 'test', but it's really not a good idea -- man test.) -- Rich Gibbs princeton.edu |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 05:19 AM PDT GSteven wrote: I would use a Debian distribution with the minimum of packages you can install. It can do the job you want it to do without any problem, and you can use it as a firewall also with some more work. It's an old machine, but it can serve as a server for some services also. -- Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez Director Tecnico de bgSEC com bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos http://www.bgsec.com ESPAÑA The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow Roman candles. -- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road" |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 04:33 AM PDT Doug Laidlaw wrote: know how to You have separate /usr & /usr/local partitions? So in the root partition, create the mount point [directory] /usr. Mount the user partition onto /usr. Create [once only] the directory /usr/local - it will actually be /local in the /usr partition. Mount the /usr/local partition onto the /usr/local mount point. That's the recipe! If you *ever* want to mount /usr/local without mounting /usr, then you'll need mount point /usr/local in root. -- Merci........Yvan I did not want to repeat other people's mistakes. So I made new mistakes of my own. Boy did I invent some good ones! |
Posted: 13 Sep 2004 04:06 AM PDT Patrick Guio <uib.no> wrote: Yes, that is my opinion. To be exact, I am not sure if it is still recommended to have /boot on a separate partition at the beginning of the hard disk or if that has become obsolete with new hardware or boot loaders. Maybe somebody else knows more about this. If not, a single partition with an ext3 file system for / would be enough. Yours, Laurenz Albe |
Posted: 12 Sep 2004 07:36 PM PDT In comp.os.linux.setup, Nico Kadel-Garcia <net> wrote on Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:46:15 -0400 <com>: I'm not sure if sshd is started by default, though. -- #191, net It's still legal to go .sigless. |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Linux To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |