Global address list edit - Microsoft Exchange |
- Global address list edit
- How to change neame format in Exch. 2003
- Distribution lists with restricted access receiving unauthorized m
- Exchange 2003: The e-mail account does not exist at the organization" when sending to ONE INTERNAL user
- local delivery delays in Exchange 2007
- Underliverable: FW: #5.1.1
- Multiple copy of the same email
- Standby Backup Server?
- Exchange 2007 32bit evalution on windows 2008
- Set Owner of Resource Mailboxe in Exchange 2000
- Opening encrypted emails
- Pop error in Server
- Exchange 2000 store size
- Removing an Exchange server with Failed Hardware
- Problems downloading mail using pop3
- Problem with using OWA and Sharepoint with NTLM authentication
- Exch2k3 migration question
- SSL CSR and OWA
- NDR 4.4.7
- Mailbox handling for disable/remove user in sbs 2003
- MSExchangeMGMT service is Stopped
- owa does not work on http
- OWA goes down with no errors
- IP Allow list provider vs IP Allow list
| Posted: 05 Oct 2007 11:53 AM PDT Is it possible to block an OU or prevent the GAL query from reading from an OU? That would solve my problem.. Cactus "Cactus Johnson" <info> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... |
| How to change neame format in Exch. 2003 Posted: 05 Oct 2007 11:43 AM PDT Yes, I can do a mass change but will admodify let me reverse the dispaly names on all acct(s)? Clayton "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message news:com... |
| Distribution lists with restricted access receiving unauthorized m Posted: 04 Oct 2007 12:08 PM PDT So if I understand this correctly, when I create a distribution list and specify that only 3 people in my exchange organization and 3 people from the company next door can send to the list, what it really means is that 3 people in my exchange organization plus everybody in the world outside my organization can send mail to that list - is that correct ? -- Steve Paul "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
| Posted: 04 Oct 2007 08:30 AM PDT Hi, I dont think an address conflict in the GAL is likely. If you try and add an email address in AD which already exists, you are prevented from doing so for that very reason. Several users have reported problems in sending to the problem user's mailbox and I feel it is a little unlikely that they would all have problem contacts. Please not that this is an occasional problem. The issue about "No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient" is far more frequent (daily). Im afraid I konw very little about the legacyExchangeDN attribute. How do I find this out? I do not believe any of her email addresses have changed in teh last few months. Thanks, C On 4 Oct, 16:43, "Susan" <nospam.com> wrote: |
| local delivery delays in Exchange 2007 Posted: 04 Oct 2007 04:00 AM PDT We use a combination of Symantic Corp Edition 10.1 and Symantec Av for MS Exchange. We only have one mailbox information store and public store. I'm new to 2007 so I am looking for queue monitoring tools... I am not real suspicious of the AV system as simple one or two line text messages can be delayed and they contain nothing the AV system should care about. I hate to turn it off as I can't reproduce the problem on demand and it would be hard to know if things are different for perhaps several days. "Andy David {MVP}" wrote: |
| Posted: 03 Oct 2007 10:03 AM PDT Hi Ed, thx so much for your post. How do I verify to see which user(s) granted deleted user as delegate/alternate recipient?? Thx again in advance. - TKM "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
| Multiple copy of the same email Posted: 03 Oct 2007 09:33 AM PDT I check the header of each two same email and the only difference in the header is that: header on email#1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2007 07:01:28.0226 (UTC) FILETIME=[383E5020:01C8058B] header on email#2 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2007 14:31:33.0862 (UTC) FILETIME=[18DB5860:01C805CA] Your conclusion? "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
| Posted: 03 Oct 2007 01:07 AM PDT John, thank you very much - this seems to be exactly what I was looking for! Gerd "John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" <com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:com... |
| Exchange 2007 32bit evalution on windows 2008 Posted: 02 Oct 2007 07:09 AM PDT PowerShell is included in Windows 2008; you need to install it manually: ServerManagerCmd -i PowerShell See also, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb691354.aspx for details on installing the various Windows 2008 pre-reqs. Hope this helps. "Kasper Bøggild" <dk> wrote in message news:com... |
| Set Owner of Resource Mailboxe in Exchange 2000 Posted: 02 Oct 2007 05:19 AM PDT I don't know how you'd do that without writing custom code. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "Assaf" <com> wrote in message news:googlegroups.com... |
| Posted: 01 Oct 2007 08:50 AM PDT Your explanation seems right to me too, but I'm hardly an expert on this PKI stuff, so I really don't know. It makes my brain hurt. Sorry. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "Auschten" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 01 Oct 2007 05:18 AM PDT Hi, I don't know what that was but just error in the event viewer and there are so much of them. I shall post this to the sbs forum. Thank you for the direction. "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message news:OWA$phx.gbl... |
| Posted: 30 Sep 2007 04:25 PM PDT I think I may have answered this m'self. ---from a related kb--- For example, a mailbox may appear to use only 250 MB of space in Exchange System Manager, but the total space that the mailbox uses may be 450 MB. This difference occurs because the 200 MB of space that the Priv.stm file uses does not appear in Exchange System Manager. ---endquote--- I need them to clear out more. So the question changes. Is there a way to identify who has significant content in the .stm? and which items they are? I understand that the .stm is 'internet' rather than 'local' (basic). "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <nellie> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
| Removing an Exchange server with Failed Hardware Posted: 27 Sep 2007 04:25 PM PDT Thanks. I appreciate it. |
| Problems downloading mail using pop3 Posted: 26 Sep 2007 10:43 PM PDT Thanks! I'll give it a try. "Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote: |
| Problem with using OWA and Sharepoint with NTLM authentication Posted: 26 Sep 2007 10:15 PM PDT Hi I had this issue and i resolved by adding OWA into trusted zones (IE) and changed the custom level on client for User Authentication to automatic logo only in intranet zone (last custom) There is nothing you can do at the server level (i maybe wrong) J "TiCaL" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 26 Sep 2007 07:08 PM PDT There are issues of message replyability, users' Contacts and Personal Address Book entries, manager-delegate relationships, and more. If you're small, you might find these issues to be manageable. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "msadexchman" <com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 26 Sep 2007 01:50 PM PDT You're on Exchange Server 2003 - are you using the same cert for TLS on IMAP, POP3, SMTP? - If OWA is the only thing you're using this for, and you don't want any interruptions - try to create a new cert request using the Certificates snap-in (with scope set to Local Computer when you add the snap-in to a MMC console) first. - If that doesn't work, and you need to remove the cert/binding temporarily - it'll be for the time it takes you to create a new cert request and then re-bind the existing cert to the OWA site. - I would try this on a test box/VM first. -- Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ---------------------------------------------- "totoro" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Posted: 26 Sep 2007 09:40 AM PDT You can do an nslookup for the MX record(s) of the destination mail server(s) and telnet to those. Any errors in the event log? "Bruce D" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
| Mailbox handling for disable/remove user in sbs 2003 Posted: 26 Sep 2007 03:24 AM PDT Hi Andy, Thanks and will look into outlook and exmerge. Many thanks, Kind regards, "Andy David {MVP}" <com> wrote in message news:com... |
| MSExchangeMGMT service is Stopped Posted: 25 Sep 2007 08:16 AM PDT No, you'll be fine. You're welcome to disable the service until somebody screams about it! It's likely nobody will. -- Ed Crowley MVP - Exchange "Protecting the world from PSTs and brick backups!" "Smiley" <com> wrote in message news:fdg5a5$si3$2$demon.co.uk... |
| Posted: 25 Sep 2007 02:32 AM PDT I found the problem, read and write was not enabled on the default website, its working fine now. Thanks for the help. "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
| Posted: 24 Sep 2007 08:30 AM PDT Phil <microsoft.com> wrote: So this is a single server network? Hosting your own mail is fine. Hosting your public website on your Exchange server (and a domain controller, yet!) is running with scissors, and the fact that you're a small company is irrelevant. In fact, small companies tend not to have as much money to invest in the kind of hardware that might help them recover from an attack (a spare server) or a good firewall. Seriously, outsource that - and llock down your network. Just because you haven't gotten into a bad motorcycle accident yet doesn't mean you shouldn't be wearing a helmet. Since port 80 is one of the more frequently scanned for/targeted ports on the internet, it's entirely possible that your hosting has something to do with this. Does an IISRESET fix the problem? Can you test by blocking inbound traffic on 80 for a little while to see if the problem recurs? This is a reply :) |
| IP Allow list provider vs IP Allow list Posted: 22 Sep 2007 02:15 PM PDT "Luka Manojlovic" <manojlovic.net> wrote: I'm afraid I won't be of much help with that. I don't use Exchange as a spam filter or a connection control point. While I can see the benefit of using a static (or even a dynamic) IP address block, the use of an IP address to whitelist messages from /every/ check doesn't appeal to me. I've /had/ to do that, but I don't think I've got more than 20 such IP whitelistings. I don't mind whitelisting IPs from some subset of the checks we use, but I'd much rather see the sender correct the problem. -- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Don't send mail to this address mailto:com Or to these, either: mailto:com mailto:com mailto:com |
| You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
