Microsoft CRM - attachments in notes |
- attachments in notes
- Customizing Lead Form
- Is this an appropriate "help desk" solution?
- Error during installation
- Company numbers generated automatic from MS CRM
- what are the crmForm Properties and Methods
- Dupicate Record Error - Urgent to fix
- Leads entity in v3.0
- Unistall CRM
- Assign problems
- custom attribute in crm
- Using onchange event to Hide a field
- CRM Reports don't work after installation
- Conditional Formatting in Workflow E-mail
- CRM and GP integration with Biztalk 2002
- Email to generate case
- Lost Contact and Notes
- New Install Issues
- Create new case
- LocalSystem vs Domain User
- SQL Server 2000 Report Pack for Microsoft CRM
- Beta-Newsgroup for CRM v3?
- Workflow Manager not editing existing rules
- E-Mail Error: An unexpected error occurred
- Starting over with CRM & SBS
Posted: 18 Aug 2005 10:59 AM PDT Matt, Thank you. I am starting to fumble my way through this. I found where to change the form. I added a tab, and sections and fields. I first went into the schema mgr and went into accounts and added 3 new "schemas" - all were strings. I saved the new form and all looks like it should be ok, however, when I go into accounts, the old form still shows up. Do I need to restart services? I am overlooking something simple. I did not know what to do about mapping... do I need to do any mapping? "MattNC" wrote: |
Posted: 18 Aug 2005 08:51 AM PDT I did an IISReset and it now displays the field. Thank you so much Brandon. As a side question why would this require an IISReset? I thought that publishing it would have updated the form. -- Martin "Brandon" <nospam.com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Is this an appropriate "help desk" solution? Posted: 18 Aug 2005 03:31 AM PDT I would agree with Matt, *providing* you are supporting external customers. MSCRM 1.2 has limitations when providing support internally within the same enterprise, due to the way the CRM Email router works. These limitations will disappear, I believe, in the next release when the Email Router will be abandoned Peter "MattNC" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 18 Aug 2005 01:49 AM PDT the problem was that there was a language conflict the operation system was in german and the crm in english |
Company numbers generated automatic from MS CRM Posted: 18 Aug 2005 12:39 AM PDT I'm afraid I don't exclusively own the intellectual property rights to the code I've written before, so can't publish it anywhere. To get you started on post-callouts, have a look at the following MSDN article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/crmsdk1_2/htm/v1d2postcallouts.asp As to writing the code to generate numbers, I'd suggest the following: - Create a SQL table to track and generate numbers; the easiest option is use a Identity column as this will prevent duplicate numbers being assigned - Use the CRMAccount.Update method to save the number. See: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/CrmSdk1_2/htm/v1d2crmaccountupdatemethod.asp - Be careful if using PostUpdate, as a call within this to CRMAccount.Update will cause another call to PostUpdate, so you will need to ensure you don't create an infinite loop Hope this helps "Alwin" wrote: |
what are the crmForm Properties and Methods Posted: 17 Aug 2005 04:55 PM PDT The file you want in the source code is _forms\styles\FORM.crm.htc btw If you can wait, it looks like the Form Object Model will be an official part of the SDK in CRM 3 "John O'Donnell" wrote: |
Dupicate Record Error - Urgent to fix Posted: 17 Aug 2005 01:32 PM PDT Shauna: What are you using to check for duplicates? Did you write something yourself or are you using a third-party add-on? Just interested... -- Matt Wittemann http://icu-mscrm.blogspot.com "Shauna Koppang" wrote: |
Posted: 17 Aug 2005 08:25 AM PDT Understood, but there are 2 problems with having to on-off each and every contact: 1.) You must first pick one of say, 20 leads (as there is 1 lead per contact) to convert/create a new account record. 2.) You must go and update all of the remaining leads with the new customerid, then convert them-- one by one-- to contacts so they can be associated with the new Account record. In a B2C scenario, this may be prudent, but in a B2B, it's tedious for our Users. If an organization is your lead, it makes much more sense to be able to pre associate all of the people that say, a Telemarketer speaks with (which means multiple "Contact" lead records to properly log Phone Call Activities) before they reach the "Decision Maker" which enables the Lead(s) to be converted to an Account/Contact/Opportunity. It seems redundant and superfluous to either a.) only include one contact in the Lead process, as this is never the case for us and b.) Have no automation that can handle many to one association for "contact" leads within an "account" lead so that the conversion process sets everyone up where they need to live outside the realm of the Leads entity. What ends up happening with our end users is that they create one lead for the account/facility, then they import all of the contact data directly into the Contacts entity so as to save the hassle of converting individual Lead records to Contacts. --Dodd "John O'Donnell" wrote: |
Posted: 17 Aug 2005 06:35 AM PDT Hi, So, what if, for some foolish reason, that user profile no longer exists on the machine or has changed significantly? What might be the procedure for a "force uninistall" of SFO when the original user has gone missing? I was able to get most of the way through this by removing folders and reg keys, but when I reinstalled SFO, even though it seemed to go through, there was a problem creating folders. Thank You for any help, E. Palmer "Simon" wrote: |
Posted: 17 Aug 2005 05:41 AM PDT I posted a similar problem but for some interesting reason the post never made it. Basically when a salesperson leaves we re-assign their contacts to other salespeople. We started noticing that more than just the contacts are re-assigned. All the associated orders went with the contacts as well and that is very very poor design behaviour. Can anyone confirm you are getting the same behaviour? Thanks! "Harald" wrote: |
Posted: 17 Aug 2005 12:49 AM PDT hi again thanks for the reply .one more question. what is PostCallout ? "Jose Berrios [ASP.NET MVP]" wrote: |
Using onchange event to Hide a field Posted: 16 Aug 2005 11:50 PM PDT I just saw a blog about dynamically hiding an entire tab (within the given entity) based on the value selected in a picklist. If it's possibole to move the fields you'd like to hide dynamically onto their own tab, you might find some value in this guys sample code: http://blogs.msdn.com/joris_kalz/archive/2005/07/27/444152.aspx --Dodd "cdobkins" wrote: |
CRM Reports don't work after installation Posted: 16 Aug 2005 10:40 PM PDT Crystal uses an ODBC connection IIRC called CE90. That specifies the location of the database. Rob Bakkers, Avanade Netherlands "DougMann" wrote: |
Conditional Formatting in Workflow E-mail Posted: 16 Aug 2005 02:06 PM PDT Wow. That's a tough one. I don't think you're going to be able to put conditional statements in the email itself. I think you'll want the conditions to be in the workflow. I'm not sure exactly how to work this out, but I think I would approach it with manual workflow rules that call other manual workflow rules (sub processes). So, you might have Rule 1 that the account rep runs when they create the opportunity. Rule 1 might go something like: If opportunity.owner = John Smith Then Run Rule 2 Else Run Rule 3 Rule 2 might say: If opportunity.CFPunderwriter = Frank Jones Then Run Rule 4 Else Run Rule 5 Then you'd need Rule 3 to say: If opportunity.CFPunderwriter = Scott Wilson Then Run Rule 6 Else Run Rule 7 You'd have to do a number of rules. I'd start by diagramming it out. Then the final rule that each branch of the diagram would get to would be the email. I guess if you have too many possible combinations, you could potentially end up writing 100 rules, and then face the prospect of someone leaving the organization or changing their name or getting promoted, and you'd be in it all over again. The other approach: Write a web application that has all of your logic built-in and call it from an ISV button on the opportunity form. This would be harder to do, but would probably end up serving your purposes better. Anyone else have some thoughts on this one??? -- Matt Wittemann http://icu-mscrm.blogspot.com "Vinh" wrote: |
CRM and GP integration with Biztalk 2002 Posted: 16 Aug 2005 12:48 PM PDT If you have been using both products disparately, you run the risk of ending up with a huge amount of unintegrated duplicate data in your systems (i.e. customers, products, etc.) Don't go into it expect your existing data to be "integrateable". Most likely you will have to migrate your data from Great Plains using the scripts provided by MS and then use some sort of de-duping tool (c360 has one with their SearchPac module) or write your own script. Bottom line, MS built the integration with the assumption that Great Plains is already in place and that you would implement it at the same time you implemented CRM. Also, once the Biztalk integration is in place you will notice many flaws in the architecture of the adapters (i.e. messages can "partially" fail, accountid is mapped to customerid but customeid is mapped to "integrationid" useless for getting the correct account #'s into Great Plains causing our Acct. Mgr. to edit customerid's with Changer, the list goes on). On top of that Biztalk is highly unstable. Jobs will run...sometimes. Message Monitoring/Diagnostic tools are a stinking pile of sh**ty hacks thrown together. I wish our development team wrote a custom integration from the get-go now that i look back on all of the time I wasted on the "free" integration. On the other hand, we have been very impressed with the Scribe INsight for CRM integration tool (our developers just went through cert training and are testing the product) and we are about to migrate off the Biztalk integration and implement the Scribe solution internally (Scribe provides a migration tool and will assist with shutting down a Biztalk solution). My advice (supported by many sleepless nights) is to avoid the "free" Biztalk integration and go with Scribe or wait for the next iteration. sorry to be so long-winded. :P Austin "Matt Parks" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 09:50 AM PDT When v3.0 is available in ~90 days, you'll be able to make this happen using the updated workflow engine. Regards, Alex -- Alex Simons Director of Program Management Microsoft CRM ------------------------- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm "MattNC" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 09:47 AM PDT So Create new databases and restore the backup to the databases. How does one connect to the databases? I have created a test environment with one server Win2003, SQL 2000, Active Directory, how does one restore the databases from my backups and install crm to access the data via sql. This would eleviate performing any work on the production server. "Dave Carr (dave- no com" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 08:50 AM PDT What's in AD? Do you see the CRM roles in your Active Directory OU's? "RcooperLTI" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 07:55 AM PDT Another option is to put a workfow in place that re-assigns the case. Matt Parks MVP - Microsoft CRM ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:39:46 -0700, "STUARTS" <microsoft.com> wrote: we have a receptionist who will be taking support calls and logging them into the CRM Service section. Unless I doing it wrong, the process seems to be that you have to create the case, save it, and then assign it to a CSR. I'm basically trying to streamline the process a little. Am I doing it right or is there a better way? "MattNC" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 07:05 AM PDT So there is no best solution? Is there a best practice for installing crm and sql on the same machine and on different machines? Thx for your help "Matt Parks" wrote: |
SQL Server 2000 Report Pack for Microsoft CRM Posted: 16 Aug 2005 06:29 AM PDT SELECTS are definitely OK. Microsoft have certified ISV add-ons for MSCRM that extensively use direct SQL SELECTS "Matt Parks" <com> wrote in message news:com... |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 06:22 AM PDT Thank you. The company i'm working in is partner of the new windows eiger and crm v3. I haven't an access to the newsgroup now, so i asked a colleague who has access to the eiger newsgroup. I couldn't find there a Newsgroup for crm v3. I will now ask my boss. I think everyone who is partner in crn v3 should be poosible to write in that newsgroup. Or am i wrong? Maybe it depends on the account which beta-newsgroups are visible. Regards, Stefan "John O'Donnell" wrote: |
Workflow Manager not editing existing rules Posted: 16 Aug 2005 03:55 AM PDT Thanks Matt, Created the reg value, and all seems to be working well. Rgds Jefferson "MattNC" wrote: |
E-Mail Error: An unexpected error occurred Posted: 16 Aug 2005 01:46 AM PDT Yes, about 4 times :) Problem still exists. "Rob Bakkers" wrote: |
Posted: 16 Aug 2005 12:04 AM PDT Still no good.... I got everything except CRM running with apparently no problems. When I try to reinstall CRM I've tried attaching to the existing database which is listed under the SQL server but for some reason I\it can not attach to it. I get an error that says either the database does not exist or CRM can not attach to the server. Well, thank you MS I guess I couldnt have figured that out on my own. The only thing I can come up with is that there is a password issue between SQL and CRM that isnt syncing up correctly or it has something to do with the SSL from the previous install. Any help from anyone would be greatly appreciated..... "MattNC" wrote: |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft CRM To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |