Pages

Search

Exchange Server 2003 (Windows Server 2003 SBS) POP Mail Problem - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange Server 2003 (Windows Server 2003 SBS) POP Mail Problem - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange Server 2003 (Windows Server 2003 SBS) POP Mail Problem

Posted: 24 Jan 2006 11:21 AM PST

I have not been able to yet. I have the user forwarding me every
message that does this right now, but am still searching for a way to
resolve this.

Another Strange Problem

Posted: 23 Jan 2006 04:40 PM PST


"Francisco (Newbie)" <microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:com... 

Well, if TCP port 25 isn't open, that would explain why you can't get any
SMTP mail from the Internet. Check your router/firewall. Also check to make
sure your ISP isn't blocking it.
 

Public calendar reminder

Posted: 23 Jan 2006 08:51 AM PST


"Claudio" <it> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

Most welcome. Thank Ken Slovak, too. :)
 

PGP vs Digital IDs

Posted: 23 Jan 2006 07:59 AM PST

Vanguard <com> wrote:
 

I'll confirm this. Some of the people in the company for which I work
exchange encrypted mail with people in another company. They have
encryption enabled all the time and if there's a cert for the recipient, the
message will be encrypted. If there is no cert, then there is no
encryption. Outlook handles it automatically.

As for the person being in the Contacts folder, it's not necessary in the
case of a publically -available LDAP server in which Outlook can perform a
query for the recipient. That's how we have things set up. We reference an
LDAP server in which can be found the names of those people who have certs.
Outlook will first look in the Contacts folder and then query the LDAP
server if the name isn't in the folder.
--
Brian Tillman

Exchange 2003 Memory Errors

Posted: 21 Jan 2006 11:35 PM PST

We set Heapdecommitfreeblockthreshold to 0x40000 in order to tell the memory
manager to what a bit after a free block is no longer used before releasing
it. Specifically the key specifies the number of byte of contiguous memory
above which memory is decommitted. It's one way to reduce fragmentation of
virtual memory.

Event ID 9665 is logged if Exchange detects a virtual memory configuration
error. If you set Heapdecommitfreeblockthreshold to anything other than
0x40000, a 9665 will be logged. An event ID 12800 is associated with the
intermittent failure of the IMAIL comonent during content conversion. A
9582 is logged if your VM largest block size falls to 32M or lower. You
don't see any of these which is a bit perplexing. The IMAIL component is
also associated with the event ID 327. You see a 327 if there was an issue
during content conversion. In the text of the 327, you'll see the call that
had a problem; ecgetmime, ecgetfilehandle, and so forth. If the call that
failed was eccopyto to the store, this could indicate a problem. I've
acutally seen this in environments where there are no message size limits,
and a user decided to attach the contents of their local hard drive to a
message, or a few gigs of mp3 files, or whatever. You might want to try a
reasonalby high limit that is smaller than your largest VM block.





"Kostas Mastrogiannis" <gr> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Word docs in public folder?

Posted: 21 Jan 2006 02:01 PM PST

Sure, that's why we have public folders. You just make a post to the folder
with the Word (or any file) attached to it.


"instauratio" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

How to prevent some users send/receive external mails but not internal ones ?

Posted: 21 Jan 2006 09:12 AM PST

Hi,

This should help: http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html

Leif

"JDB" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Maintenance Tool ... does it exist? (Crossposted)

Posted: 20 Jan 2006 10:04 AM PST

Third party tools. Ontrack Powercontrols possibly.


"Jan K. van Dalen" <vandjATmarkross.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Event ID 9153,8213 and DCRPOMO replication rejection

Posted: 20 Jan 2006 06:36 AM PST

Hello Leif,

This case has been in discussion with Jorge in "active directory replication
error"
Post, I am attaching the complete discusion for your reference.

hello Jorge,

Now this is the current situation as you said:-
1. DC2 Holds All FSMO's - YES
2. Is GC - YES
3. Has Exchange - YES
4. Has DNS and DHCP - YES
5. Is DNS AD Integrated - YES
6. Is DC2 pointing to itself for the preferred DNS and pointing to DC1 for
alternate DNS - YES
7. DC1 is already out of network and no longer available.
8. DC2 NETDOM QUERY FSMO Results
-------------------
C:\>netdom query fsmo
Schema owner CORP_MAIL.eih-india.com
Domain role owner CORP_MAIL.eih-india.com
PDC role CORP_MAIL.eih-india.com
RID pool manager CORP_MAIL.eih-india.com
Infrastructure owner CORP_MAIL.eih-india.com
The command completed successfully.
-----------------------
9. Confirm DC2 is GC - YES
10. Metadata for DC1 is cleaned on DC2 - YES
11. NTDS Settings and Server object in sites and services for DC1 - REMOVED
12. Computer account for DC1 in computers container and domain controllers
OU - REMOVED
13. Open ADSIEDIT, go to "CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File
Replication Service,CN=System,DC=YOURDOMAIN,DC=YOURTLD" and maken sure only
DC2 is listed - CONFIRMED
14. Open DNS MMC and remove all records from DC1 - REMOVED
15. We are not using DFS.

all has been done as you said, please confirm that my NETDOM query is OK?
and should I run REPADMIN /OPTIONS CORP_MAIL -DISABLE_INBOUND_REPL
-DISABLE_OUTBOUND_REPL Command now.

Do I need to restart the server after this command, and what will be the
impact on exchange server after this activity.

Thanks,

Sudesh


"Jorge de Almeida Pinto [MVP]" wrote:
 


Regards,

Sudesh


"Leif Pedersen [MVP]" wrote:
 

Two domains e-mail traffic to One Exchange Server.

Posted: 20 Jan 2006 05:09 AM PST



In news:com,
MLA! <microsoft.com> typed: 

The two aren't related - you could set up bogusdomain.com in your recipient
policy.
 

Sure.
 

events entered show up on a shared calendar 1 hour different

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 03:13 PM PST



In news:com,
frankie <postalias> typed: 

Also check Outlook's time zone settings/daylight savings time - tools,
options, calendar options.

Exchange sending junk email to incorrect mailbox

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 12:30 PM PST

Can you turn on Message Tracking to insure the messages are being delivered
correctly?

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Exchange_Server_2003_Message_Flow.html

--
John Oliver, Jr
MCSE, MCT, CCNA
Exchange MVP 2006
Microsoft Certified Partner

"Heather" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

mailbox is just floating in a information store

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 10:10 AM PST

The reply may be correct but it is a bit terse.
It seems so obvious I imagine you have already tried it.
I have noticed that there is somtime a delay between applying a change on
the Exchange server and the efect becoming visible and effective in Outlook.
Exchange seems to have lot to do and does its different tasks in cycles of
many minutes.
The overall effect is that corrections an solutions that are given here and
elsewhere appear not to be working, when in fact they are but need some time
to get active. Sometimes Outlook needs to beclosed and reopened to take
account of changes made.

That's the impression I have. Technically, it may not be true.

Paul


"Andy David - MVP" <com> a écrit dans le
message de news: com... 

exchange 2003 server rebuild

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 09:10 AM PST

Hi,

The names of the "site" and organization is already in the active directory
so that should be applied automatically. Same holds true for user mailboxes
and Outlook functionality.

Leif

"jojo" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Backup exchange server

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 07:06 AM PST

Hi,

It would be possible to have an online exchange server running but you
wouldn't be able to use it for much as this server would have a different
name as the existing and therefore of no use.

If you really want a standby server you can install a server with the same
specs as your current exchange server. Install Windows on this server and
make sure to keep it up to date with patches. Should disaster strike you
remove the original exchange server from the network, rename the new server
to the exchange server name, install Exchange with the /disasterrecovery
switch and restore the information store.

If you practice this in a test environment you should be able to get
exchange server in the air again within some hours of a disaster (of course
depending of the database sizes.

Leif

"Eric" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Two Storage Group Dilemma

Posted: 19 Jan 2006 06:26 AM PST

Let me give you more detail. We have two different e-mail addresses set up
on the same Exchange Server.

abc.com
xyz.com

When com sends e-mail the internet header information say the
e-mail originated from mail.abc.com. We have created 2 SMTP virtual servers
to try to route e-mail from abc.com to VS 1 and email from xyz.com to VS 2.
So far we have been unsucessful. We have different IP's assigned to each VS.

Hope that explains it a little better.


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Security Permissions on Address List!!!!!!!!

Posted: 18 Jan 2006 10:27 PM PST

All set thanks!

"Gabe Matteson" <biz.nospam> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

x500 address

Posted: 18 Jan 2006 09:37 AM PST

Thanks for the input John...unfortunately I'm not quite at the skill level.
I think I need a little better understanding of script writing and Exchange
2003.

"John Fullbright" wrote:
 

Remove Exchange 2000 Server

Posted: 18 Jan 2006 06:40 AM PST

Thanks again John,

I did that for about a month back and the exchange server 2003 was working
alone (2000 server was down) for a month now.

--
Eric


"John Oliver, Jr. [MVP]" wrote:
 

Default Offline Address List

Posted: 17 Jan 2006 07:42 AM PST

Delete the empty one and then yes, do a rebuild on the OAB.
Your clients will download a refreshed copy.

bypassing junk mail filtering for internal (IIS server) emails

Posted: 17 Jan 2006 06:12 AM PST

Thanks Mark. I will implement your suggestion. Will I still have an issue
with my Outlook Junk Email filters (using Outlook Cached Mode) flagging some
of these emails as Junk? I have tried turning off IMF completely and I still
get some of these internal emails sent to the Junk folder.



"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

shorten NDR's

Posted: 17 Jan 2006 03:26 AM PST

If you reject undeliverable messages with a 550 error it means that
legitimate senders that just happen to mis-type the destination address will
still get an undeliverable error message generated by their own mail server.

The big advantage is that your outgoing mail queues aren't full of stuck
NDRs that will never be delivered because the sender address was invalid and
you won't be sending NDRs to innocent people who've had their email address
spoofed.

As an added bonus I've personally found that ORF blocks about 99% of spam

Peter Lawton

PS
I'm not connected with Vamsoft, I'm just an extremely happy sys-admin who
uses their product.

"Alex Guess" <alexnews [at] guess [dot] me [dot] uk> wrote in message
news:u$phx.gbl...