Pages

Search

email problem - Microsoft Exchange

email problem - Microsoft Exchange


email problem

Posted: 29 Nov 2005 10:19 PM PST

Ben
thanks for the response

No NDR from hotmail account
I telneted from a client PC from within the LAN:
telnet jupiter 25 [server name] works OK
telnet 192.168.16.2 25 works OK
telnet <domainname>.com.au 25 fails
Firewall from SBS 2003 , not third party

rgds
Robert





"Ben M. Schorr - MVP" <mvp> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 


Cannot add SMTP e-mail address to user

Posted: 29 Nov 2005 03:00 PM PST

A very easy way to do this is to go to AD Users & Computers, right-click on
your Domain | Find | change the Find drop-down to "Custom Search" (you could
also change the "IN" drop-down to "Entire Directory" if you have more than 1
domains) | go to Advanced tab | type
"(proxyAddresses=smtp:com)".

This will give you the object - of any type (user, group, contact, public
folders... ) - that has that email address.

No, the search is NOT case-sensitive, though email addresses (local-part)
are case sensitive according to RFCs (but not all MTAs treat them as such).
--
Bharat Suneja
MCSE, MCT
www.zenprise.com
blog: www.suneja.com/blog
-----------------------------------------


"Sean Vreeland" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 


Massive Increase in SPAM?

Posted: 29 Nov 2005 01:04 PM PST

We have.. As it get closer to Christmas the silly season starts with the
spammers.. We notice this every year
"Fred Yarbrough" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 


Change Grouping

Posted: 29 Nov 2005 06:45 AM PST

What about the info within. I tried deleting one of the DL and got the
message with the following check box "Mark each selected Exchange
mailbox for deletion".

Is it just talking about the mailbox (DL) that I'm currently deleting??

Tom Felts wrote: 

Problems with Outlook 2003

Posted: 29 Nov 2005 06:30 AM PST

Well...do you actually have an Exchange Server? Are you really running
Outlook on a Windows 2003 Server or did you mean this is a Windows XP box?


--
Aloha,

-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, OneNote-MVP
Roland Schorr & Tower
http://www.rolandschorr.com
Microsoft OneNote FAQ: http://www.factplace.com/onenotefaq.htm

**I apologize but I am unable to respond to direct requests for assistance.
Please post questions and replies here in the newsgroup. Mahalo!


"Fernando Silva" <pt> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 


Probagating mailbox/inbox folder permissions

Posted: 28 Nov 2005 03:33 PM PST



In news:com,
Bretto <microsoft.com> typed: 

In addition to Mark's reply, you could always grant full mailbox access to
whomever you wish - it will, however, provide access to everything, not just
the inbox/mail folders.


Can't receive email.

Posted: 28 Nov 2005 02:01 PM PST

Hi Mark,
The smtp interface is listerning on "all unassigned", and when I telnet to
25 using either the ip or server name I get the message "esmtp mail service
(followed by version #) ready at (date and time).

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Moving X2K3 from W2K server to W2K3 server

Posted: 28 Nov 2005 01:07 PM PST

At least you found the answer in the end.
Hope it helps.

want to know it's working

Posted: 28 Nov 2005 10:59 AM PST

i was looking at the information on your domain name, thinking somehow maybe
the webminders name was setup for secondary mail server, but it doesn't look
like it is with the same company.

yes it would explain why you can send mail and not receive
on the outside, there is a pointer for your email, but it's pointing in the
wrong direction
if your exchange server is named (for example) mail.dgbco.com then an mx
record needs to replace the webminders address with mail.dgbco.com with your
exchange server's ip
being able to telnet on 25 to your server is good to know it's working.
when someone on the outside sends you mail, it checks dns for the mx record
for your domain, which currently is mx.webminders.com so it attempts to
deliver the mail there; the other end doesn't know about your mail server.
changing the mx record to your mail server will allow mail to go to you.

this should explain it more
http://www.han.com/dns.html

HTH

"instauratio" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 


Restore Exchange 200 "Unable to create log path" message

Posted: 28 Nov 2005 09:29 AM PST

Okay - further developments. The DB's had never been created on the restore
server, so I mounted them to create blank DB's, then dismounted and made sure
the "overwrite with a restore" was checked. I can restore all DB's except for
the MAILBOX STORE which returns another error, however as this DB has no
mailboxes am I right not to be concerned about restoring this? We're doing
this exercise to ensure we have a relativley up to date Exchange Server in
the event of our production server failing, and also to test DR plans.

"Leena" wrote:
 

Multiple connections in virtual SMTP queue

Posted: 27 Nov 2005 07:47 PM PST

It should be in the 'Current Session' instead of the 'Queue'. Apologise for
the error. THanks

Des

"Desmond" <com.sg> wrote in message
news:dmdumv$l81$pacific.net.sg... 


Danger of running Treo 650, activesync without SSL

Posted: 27 Nov 2005 12:44 PM PST

I thought you had Standard Exchange Server. Well, in your case this should
work. I have not had any issues with Activesync with Treos on the SBS. Do
you a Root Certificate from Verisign or such? This should work for you so I
am little confused now. Just for kicks, try leaving SSL enabled and disable
Forms Authentication. Also check your Event Viewer for any related
Activesync errors when this happens.

--
John Oliver, Jr.
MCSE, MCT, CCNA, Exchange MVP
Microsoft Certified Partner
"Fredly" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 


RPC over http loginbox

Posted: 25 Nov 2005 06:09 AM PST

Okey here is all my settings:
Client -SSL- ISA -rpc- Exchange

https://secure.domain.com outside
[mailserver].place.domain.com.local inside

ISA 2004 openend /rpc/* +/owa/* + /exchange/*
Exchange 2003 sp1 ports 6002 and 6004 +proxy settings.

- Dont know what you mean: (you may need to tick the extra
box in Outlook)??
- Im no sure how to test on the inside, when we don use the same domain name.

Best Regards
/micke


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: