Pages

Search

E5.5 Migration Into AD Domain - Microsoft Exchange

E5.5 Migration Into AD Domain - Microsoft Exchange

E5.5 Migration Into AD Domain

Posted: 05 Jan 2005 09:33 AM PST

Thanks Mark, you made a good point. The only wrinkle there is that we have
several other legacy systems that are using a few NT 4.0 accounts. The
upgrade may screw them up so my upgrade may have to wait until I can wean
the legacy apps off of the old NT 4.0 domain.


Thanks,
Fred



"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:com... 
of 
NT 
over 
let 
and 
the 
I 
Does 

Imcdata logs

Posted: 05 Jan 2005 08:43 AM PST

Thank you............I tried your suggestion and it works

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

Adding Legal Disclaimer to All Out-going Mail on E2K & E2K3

Posted: 05 Jan 2005 05:23 AM PST

Thankyou for the information, I really appreciate your very prompt reply!

I know what you mean about the name...


"Neil Hobson [MVP]" <silversands.co.uk> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

need to save attachments sent to a dl

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 01:03 PM PST

What about script sinks?
If you need help just send me an email.
Stefan

"meg" <com> wrote in message
news:microsoft.com... 

Ms Exchange 5.5 decomissioning

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 11:38 AM PST

There is more to do/verify (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/152959)

1) Offline Address Book
2) Schedule+/FreeBusy data
3) Routing Calculation Server
4) Site connectors (if you have any)

"Ovidiu Tanjala" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

I need help with OMA

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 10:55 AM PST

Hi,
Are you saying that even if I change OWA to use 8080 OMA will still listen
at 80?

"Tim Hackbart [MSFT]" wrote:
 

New Message Indicator

Posted: 04 Jan 2005 05:55 AM PST

Hi Mike, our email comes in through pop account from another building in the
state, i believe they are doing spam filtering there, and they are having
problems today, i would assume this is why we are having this issue...

Thanks , Steve

"Mike Talon .Yahoo.com. >" wrote:
 

front-end OWA server

Posted: 03 Jan 2005 09:01 AM PST

I see your point and I concur....manager doesn't. Now just got to run it by
him again and again so he can understand that the firewall is becoming
"swiss cheese" with all these ports open. By the way, the ports are being
opened at the Firewall not the router. The ISA server is my next
recommedation.

"Skipster" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
the 
or 
the 
server 
the 
and 
DMZ 
mean 
it 
the 
the 
accessible 
subnet 
server 
the 
subnets, 
accessible 
and 
you 
able 
able to 
no 
your 
interface. 
local 
that 
the 
<com> 
read 
the 
to 
208.xxx.xxx.xxx 
allowed 
internal 
Firewall: 

Problem in exchange 2003 and ntbackup (shadow copy)

Posted: 02 Jan 2005 06:00 AM PST

You do not pay for hotfixes -- call up Microsoft PSS and tell them you want
the hotfix for KB # xxxxx, they'll ask for your email address, and minutes
later you willhave an email with a link to the hotfix along with a password.

--
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
"The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"


<com> wrote in message
news:google.com... 

I think I'm being used as a SPAM relay -- can anyone help me?

Posted: 29 Dec 2004 06:59 AM PST

Outlook can use POP3, IMAP4 and MAPI, and if you are in corporate/workgroup
mode, you are using MAPI.

What about configuring your other systems to send through one of your
Exchange 2003 systems?

Also, do you have all of the latest security updates for Exchange 5.5
installed?
--
Scott Schnoll
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup
purposes only.


"Blake" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

outlook 2000 on behalf of

Posted: 28 Dec 2004 10:43 PM PST

If you want it to go as the other user you have give Send As rights in AD or
Exchange 5.5.

If you want to stop someone send on behalf of another user go to Tools,
Options, Delegates.

Glen


"jurie" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

wrong (.local) "reply to" address

Posted: 28 Dec 2004 03:49 PM PST

Yes, it will update itself periodically.
--
Scott Schnoll
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup
purposes only.


"Robert" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Change Display Names in Exch '03 to Last,First

Posted: 28 Dec 2004 01:03 PM PST

It's built in. You access it via a command prompt. On your AD server, go
to a command prompt, type ldifde /? and you will get the variables.
http://www.computerperformance.co.uk/Logon/CSVDE_LDIFDE.htm is a website
that should help you out as well. Here is another one.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q237677/

--
Ben Winzenz
Exchange MVP


"Precision" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Using Kill.exe on Store.exe??

Posted: 28 Dec 2004 12:17 PM PST

Hello,

If the information store that is experiencing the 217 error is not
dismounted, couldn't this cause corruption? or does the 217 error imply that
this particular store is already dismounted?

This wasn't exactly clear to me:

"Dismount all information stores that are not experiencing the problem that
is described in the "Symptoms" section. For more information about how to
dismount a store, see the "Dismount a Store" topic in Exchange Server 2003
Help.

Important Do not dismount the information stores that are mentioned in event
ID 217."

Thanks,
Exchange2003

"Teo Gomez" wrote:
 

No New Data Appearing in Web Outlook for One User

Posted: 27 Dec 2004 04:53 PM PST

Hi Mort:

Thanks, for the reply!!!

I'm not sure. Can you tell me where to go into Outlook and look?

childofthe1980s

"Mort Billups" wrote:
 

Outlook loses connection to Exchange 2003

Posted: 27 Dec 2004 02:46 AM PST

Check all the obvious infrastructure issues carefully.... DNS WINS ETC....
maybe check ure switch for network errors ( if u have a managed switch)

Is the server under hi IO load?? What speed hard disks r u running?



"Johann J Hanekom" <co.uk> wrote in message
news:.. 

Exchange 5.5 / OWA / errors

Posted: 26 Dec 2004 04:56 PM PST

Thanks. I will try today.
"neo [mvp outlook]" <mvps.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
those 
started 

Should I install Oulook on my Exchange Server?

Posted: 26 Dec 2004 01:09 PM PST

Thanks guys, that was it! I knew I have read it, I just couldn't find it
again. I even used google <G>. Thanks again for your help!


Clayton



"Clayton Sutton" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
Outlook 

Restrict users from sending outside email

Posted: 23 Dec 2004 03:13 PM PST



"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:
 
I'll trt it and see what will happen.

POP3 Mailbox problems

Posted: 23 Dec 2004 10:38 AM PST

Boris the Spider wrote: 

Set up an SMTP connector, keep the address space as *, and set it to deliver
to your ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost. Don't select "allow relay to these
domains" whatever you do!

email treated as junk/spam mail

Posted: 22 Dec 2004 10:47 PM PST

desperate employee wrote: 

You need to find out from the recipients mail server why they are
kicking it. Are you on a RBL/SBL or are you missing a ptr record for
your IP address?

--
-------------------------
Paul Stewart
Lexnet Inc.
Email address is in ROT13

Recovering Deleted Email

Posted: 22 Dec 2004 09:09 PM PST

MDB wrote: 

Create an ad user account with an exchange mailbox. Right click the
message store. Place a check in the box that says "Archive all messages
sent or received on this server". And select the mailbox. You can then
open the mailbox with outlook and see anything that comes or goes from
that point forward. Outlook 2003 has some pretty good sort, view and
find features. If these options are greyed out look through esm until
you find a system policy that may be applied and make the changes on the
system policy instead of the message store. Hope this helps.

--
-------------------------
Paul Stewart
Lexnet Inc.
Email address is in ROT13

Custom NDR's

Posted: 22 Dec 2004 12:57 PM PST

In article <phx.gbl>,
com says... 

yep, they will re-write the .dll file that the code is contained in if I
remember correctly ...

....but isnt this such a pathetic limitation. they could even sell it as
an add on option pack to be able to re-write ndr's, close/over limit
mailbox messages, etc, etc as the standard text is useless - i dont want
my users to start thinking about .pst files when they're near their
limits.