Pages

Search

C:\ExchSrvr\mdbdata\Priv.edb - VBS.Bagle.X worm. - Microsoft Exchange

C:\ExchSrvr\mdbdata\Priv.edb - VBS.Bagle.X worm. - Microsoft Exchange

C:\ExchSrvr\mdbdata\Priv.edb - VBS.Bagle.X worm.

Posted: 06 Sep 2004 06:09 AM PDT

You are scanning the priv.edb with flat-file AV software?



On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 06:09:39 -0700, "Kay Kay"
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

9GB of exchange logs in MDBDATA folder.

Posted: 06 Sep 2004 03:38 AM PDT

Do you have the Exchange agent installed? What version of Exchange are you
using?

"Leon" <ap76_at_email.com> wrote in message
news:ugUG$phx.gbl... 

configuring Exchange 2003

Posted: 06 Sep 2004 12:45 AM PDT

Not without third party software called a POP connector...not recommended.
Do you have a registered domain name? You can host your own mail on the
Exchange server very easily....perhaps want to wait til you decide to go
with Exchange or not.

http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF002.html is written for E2k but will
work with E2003 as well. Read it for an overview of how this works.

alanwforbes wrote: 

Priv.mdb

Posted: 05 Sep 2004 10:39 PM PDT

try ontrack ...
cheap and speed, in the site you find a demo to recover data from exchange,
without log file.... only with a copy of your db.

"Cold_Boot" wrote:
 

UN-INTENDED EMAIL

Posted: 05 Sep 2004 12:36 PM PDT


<microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:65f601c49384$89f30db0$gbl... 

No. BCC doesn't show up - that's why it's 'blind".
 

Not sure what you mean. If you had/have service-account level access, you
have access to everything in a mailbox. If your company is serious about
security, they will have enabled audit logging, though. And probably not
allow people to have full mailbox access. How are they saying you got access
to this message?
 

 

Rejected Mail

Posted: 05 Sep 2004 07:12 AM PDT

You can still have a copy of undeliverable mail sent to whatever mailbox you
like - set in the properties of your SMTP server. I personally don't
bother - I think it's the recipient's responsibility to address mail
correctly and if they get an NDR, they'll try again. If you have a user with
a commonly misspelled email address, you can add another email address with
the misspelling if you want.

Postmaster Bob wrote: 

Unable to reply in OWA

Posted: 05 Sep 2004 05:02 AM PDT

No pop-up blockers and XP SP2 not installed yet.

 
returns me to the inbox 

Changing the Sent From Field in Exchange Outlook 2003

Posted: 03 Sep 2004 12:30 PM PDT

dankim wrote: 

Correct his Display Name in Active Directory Users & Computers.
 

This one's fine - but note that a lot of things in SBS are different, so
m.p.windows.server.sbs may be a better place in the future. 

Badmail problem

Posted: 03 Sep 2004 09:35 AM PDT

The sender did not get anything back. As far as I can tell the events must
have been as follows:

1. Our Exchange 2003 server go the message for the 3 users but did not
deliver it to them.
2. It generated the exact NDR yoiu see below in the .BAD file but did not
send it to the original sender.

This concerns me because I see this message which should have been
delivered, but was just dumped in the badmail folder. I find it strange
that it also tried to create an NDR, but failed to send it to the valid
sender.



"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

NUL characters are not allowed

Posted: 02 Sep 2004 02:02 AM PDT

Yes, the email was sent in HTML format. But if we would to
send the html format to another domain eg yahoo.com, there
is no problem.

So we are trying to find out how to check if there is a
NUL character in the email.


Cheers,
May
 
the articles were 
message 
for 
not 

Delayed and bounced mail woes AAaaarrrrghh

Posted: 01 Sep 2004 03:19 AM PDT

Thanks Glen.

OWA Stops working

Posted: 30 Aug 2004 10:06 AM PDT


"Mike" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5f5d01c49223$30c34230$gbl... 

We have had extremely good luck with owa in about 15 installations, as well
as our own. These, however, are small installations < 150 users. We always
use ssl, denying access through port 80 at the router or firewall, and
typically do forms based authenticaion. OWA 2003 is, in my opinion, a good
selling point due to its unified look and field when compared to OL2003.
Honestly, I can't remember a single crash, or even having to do iisreset. I
wonder how many others out there have owa horror stories.