Pages

Search

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - Microsoft Exchange

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - Microsoft Exchange

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

Posted: 25 May 2004 10:20 AM PDT

No problem. Have a good day!

--
Michael Barta [MSFT]
Microsoft Exchange Support

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

<microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1212801c4427e$bdee7390$gbl... 

Messages in Queue

Posted: 25 May 2004 06:00 AM PDT

Its ok I was having a stupid moment I was searhing on 'all messages' instead
of the 'retry messages' I can see now where they are being sent to and from
now.




"Si" <net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Change Exchg server domains

Posted: 24 May 2004 05:51 PM PDT

Thanks for your reply Mark.

No.
All 3 servers are at different locations and need to stay
that way to handle local mail. It is just the overall
domain structure that has to change. Currently I have
domains Dom1, Dom2 & Dom3, 1 for each location. I need to
merge all 3 into a new global domain Dom4.

I can build a new root domain (using a non-Exchange box) &
get all the Win servers on-board but I'm unsure about
moving each Exchg setup to the new domain.

Currently each Excg has its own legacy "mail domain" ie
company.com, company.com, etc. I'm
not sure if this can continue with the new structure or if
all 3 Exchg's will "merge" into a single Directory?

Thanks, Cam 

How to change email (SMTP) address format in Exch. 2003?

Posted: 24 May 2004 04:21 PM PDT

Thanks Lanwench,

That's what I was looking for!


Lamar



"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<donotsendme.unsolicitedmail.atyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Migration from 5.5 to Exchange 2000 perm. problem

Posted: 24 May 2004 01:19 PM PDT

Can you post the Exchange server setup progress.log file that located on the
root of C:?

Is the LDAP port on 5.5 using port 389 or has it been changed?

--
Michael Barta [MSFT]
Microsoft Exchange Support

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

<microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1186901c441cf$b8443510$gbl... 

OWA 2003 Attachments: Now you see it, Now you don't

Posted: 24 May 2004 12:12 PM PDT

Thanks, however this is not the issue I am having. I can see the
attachments in Outlook but not OWA. And it is not all attachments. I think
that It may be the equivalent of URL scan. It seems like attachments with _
in the filename are getting axed in OWA. Problem is I cannot figure out how
to adjust these settings in 2003.

Any Ideas?

Thanks
"Colin" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;826253&Product=exch2003

Simply bounce emails (exchange 5.5)

Posted: 24 May 2004 04:40 AM PDT

 
notifications 

We set up a Exchange Admin mailbox and used this for the
Administrators Mailbox in the IMC for notifications. This
kept messages in one place and was easy to monitor.
through.

Exchange 2000 Crash

Posted: 23 May 2004 10:01 AM PDT

Thanks Josh, I will try that one out. I'll post on completion later today.

Mike

"Josh Muehe" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 
I'm wrong. 
Server and then moving the mailboxes: OnTrack PowerControls
(http://www.ontrack.com/powercontrols/) 
mailboxes on the new server or to PST's for future import into the server.
You're going to lose your single message store though so expect your DB's to
be bigger when you're done. 
if you need to restore a single mailbox (or message) from a backup and
aren't using a client that does brick level on Exchange.

Ping Andy David: ExMerge Question

Posted: 22 May 2004 12:57 PM PDT

On 22 May 2004 19:57:04 GMT, net wrote:
 
Update,

Found the answer: found and downloaded an older version of exmerge.

All data is now PST files and imported to each workstation.

Thanks for you help!


__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

Setting Exchange Item's permissions programmatically.

Posted: 21 May 2004 09:23 AM PDT

I am using the DaclWebTemplate mask templates . I am trying to set all
permissions provided in this template. The Write owned objects, Delete
owned objects and View item permissions are what seem not to be setting
properly. The problems are as follows:
1) The "View items" permission is reading that both deny and allow bits are
set.
2) Can change the View items to allow only if I deselect the deny check,
reselect the deny check and then select the allow check.
3) The Write and Delete owned objects will not set. Currently it reports
that they are both set to deny. I set them to allow and reload the user ACEs
and the change did not take as they are both set to deny again.

The code I am using to set these checkboxes is as follows:

//Set Write owned object check boxes.
templateMasks = daclTemplate.SearchForObjectByNT4Name("Write owned
objects").Masks;
document.frmLoad.chkWriteOwnedObjAllow.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[0] &
templateMasks[0]) == templateMasks[0]);
document.frmLoad.chkWriteOwnedObjDeny.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[1] &
templateMasks[1]) == templateMasks[1]);

//Set Delete owned objects check boxes.
templateMasks = daclTemplate.SearchForObjectByNT4Name("Delete owned
objects").Masks;
document.frmLoad.chkDeleteOwnedObjAllow.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[0] &
templateMasks[0]) == templateMasks[0]);
document.frmLoad.chkDeleteOwnedObjDeny.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[1] &
templateMasks[1]) == templateMasks[1]);

//Set View item check boxes.
templateMasks = daclTemplate.SearchForObjectByNT4Name("View item").Masks;
document.frmLoad.chkViewItemAllow.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[0] &
templateMasks[0]) == templateMasks[0]);
document.frmLoad.chkViewItemDeny.checked = ((AceEntity.Masks[1] &
templateMasks[1]) == templateMasks[1]);

"Tom Rizzo [MSFT]" <com> wrote in message
news:eP$phx.gbl... 
rights. 
setting 
attempting 
not 
the 
or 

Connecting multiple Exchange Servers

Posted: 21 May 2004 07:58 AM PDT


"Mark Arnold [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:11c5701c4423a$6b926870$gbl... 
I've got a site set up exactly how you want, one e-mail server at either
site but e-mail is only sent and received via one site and then it forwards
it to the other site, both site same address formats. Cant remember exactly
off top of my head how we did it but im 99% sure we used site connectors,
and when we originally configured it we ran both SMTP and X400 and we gave
one site a diff OU1 now just SMTP. Ill look next time i log on to that
server.

Duncan