Pages

Search

DST Patch using the Exchange Update Tool - Microsoft Exchange

DST Patch using the Exchange Update Tool - Microsoft Exchange

DST Patch using the Exchange Update Tool

Posted: 09 Mar 2007 12:49 PM PST

I joined a Microsoft chat room about DST and posted the same issue. They
asked me if a followed the procedure (KB930879) and I said I did because I
was helped by a Microsoft Exchange support engineer on the phone using live
meeting. And then I asked them will the appointments correctly displayed
after 2:00AM this Sunday and they said it would as long as I followed
correctly the procedure. I have already advised three of the affected users
to update it manually but I am just hoping that it would correctly show after
2:00AM...What do you think? Thanks for your help.

"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote:
 

This message was rejected due to the current administrative policy

Posted: 08 Mar 2007 09:32 PM PST

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 21:32:08 -0800, Fabuloussites
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 


When you generate the NDR? what happens if you leave the message alone
and Exchange generates an NDR with the actual reason? When they are
queued what reason is listed in the queue viewer?

Ca you resolve the mx records for this host? can you connect to them
via telnet?

--
Chris Scharff
Messaging Services Architect
MessageOne

Question About Features in Exchange 2007

Posted: 08 Mar 2007 10:37 AM PST

Thank you Henry. I take it that Exchange 2007 has basic web access to email
even without SP1. Is that true?
--
Dr. Doug Pruiett
Good News Jail & Prison Ministry
www.goodnewsjail.org


"Henry" wrote:
 

Which Version of Exchange Should I Use?

Posted: 08 Mar 2007 07:28 AM PST

Dear Henry:

We currently have a server running SBS 2003 and Exchange 2003. Our new
server will have Windows Server Standard 2003 R2 x64 and Exchange 2007. Will
it be possible to retrieve/copy or otherwise get the mail messages and shared
contacts from the Exchange 2003 machine onto the Exchange 2007 machine?
--
Dr. Doug Pruiett
Good News Jail & Prison Ministry
www.goodnewsjail.org


"Henry" wrote:
 

Exchange Calendar update tool = unable to find mailbox timezone:Error 0x80004005

Posted: 08 Mar 2007 05:36 AM PST

I have gone into each store and given myself full access rights to each
storage group. How do i manually apply these settings to my account?


"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

<YOUROLDDOMAIN.com #5.5.0 smtp;521-EHLO/HELO from sender MYIPADDRESS does not map to YOURNEWDOMAIN.com in DNS>

Posted: 07 Mar 2007 09:01 PM PST

You will need to enter exch2k3.us.abc.com in the FQDN of your smtp vs
not us.abc.com. Give that a shot.

James Chong (MVP)
MCSE | M+, S+, MCTS, Security+
msexchangetips.blogspot.com


On Mar 8, 10:59 pm, "Chirashi" <comcast.net> wrote: 

Primary SMTP Address

Posted: 07 Mar 2007 12:43 PM PST

branch.company.com has never been used, so I'll dump it.

Thank you so much!

"Kate Follis (MSFT)" wrote:
 

All incoming mail to be relayed to this domain checkbox

Posted: 07 Mar 2007 04:00 AM PST

So you have a connector for your internal non Exchange domain with
where to send the mail and allowance to relay to the right host?
Doesn't sound like you've got the connector created properly.

Change "From" for specific email address

Posted: 06 Mar 2007 09:53 PM PST

Hi Bharat,

I created a contact for a user and tested it, but it still shows up as
the Display name from the remote Active Directory when receiving
emails to a local user. Is there any way to change this for specific
remote email addresses?

Thanks very much,
Michael

Exchange mailbox scheduled contents deletion

Posted: 06 Mar 2007 07:31 PM PST

Hi

Thanks for the response. The reason behind not just deleting all SPAM
suspects is not so we can screen every email, but just in case one of our
users contacts use regarding a missing email from a customer, we can do a
quick search throught the most recent email to check if it has been
inadvertently caught by our SPAM filter.

Cheers

"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
 

LDAP question

Posted: 06 Mar 2007 02:26 PM PST

"Clayton Sutton" <com> wrote in message
news:J5AHh.40318$news.easynews.com... 

I haven't got an explanation for that - it should have worked. Try =*
instead.

Lee.
--
___________________________________

Outlook Web Access for PDA and WAP:
www.leederbyshire.com
___________________________________

GAL question

Posted: 06 Mar 2007 01:24 PM PST

If the user is filtered out of the gal you will not be able to resolve it. When you do a check names you are making a call to the active directory to check for that user in the address list container, so if you want this to work you will need to get them in the gal by either unfiltering them or un-hiding them from the address book if they are hidden

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Dgoldman
http://blogs.msdn.com/dgoldman
Download OABInteg (http://gotdotnet.com/Community/UserSamples/Download.aspx?SampleGuid=A2338E73-F521-4071-9B1D-AAF49C346ACD)
"Clayton Sutton" <com> wrote in message news:5nAHh.15015$news.easynews.com...
Hey Bharat,

Thanks for your reply. We are a Univ. and we have two AD and Email domains,
one for Fac/Staff and one for students. We filtered out the student address
so they don't show up in the GAL, but the acct(s) are NOT hidden via ((ADUC
| User properties | Exchange Advanced tab) they are just filtered out.

To run the patch for DST 2007 on an Exchange server you first have to create
an Outlook profile on the server that you want to run the update tool on.
That persents a problem, to create a profile you have to be able to resolve
the name. However, the name won't resolve if it's not in the GAL. I
created an AD user on the student side that I want use but it's not in the
GAL. Some how I need to get it in the GAL so it will resolve.

Maybe I could just move my acct. to that server and run the tool? Anyone
have any feedback on that?

--

TIA,


Clayton


P.S.: I wrote an iTunes podcast tutorial and just want to publicize it.
You can find it at: http://www.nikoli.net/itunepod

*******************



"Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <spam.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...