Writing an img file to a pen drive - Forums Linux |
- Writing an img file to a pen drive
- Does vsFTPd+SSL+virtual users works?
- Mandriva 2006.0 - too smart by a half?
- resizing ext3 partition
- vector linux laptop presario change resolution
- maildrop log activation
- Grub: Triboot ubuntu, vista, xp
- Problem mounting DVD
- Permissions in /dev/dsp
- Another quick question...media editors
- Inplace "upgrade" or migration from WinXP to Ubuntu 6.06
- eth0 not activating at startup | RHEL 4
- vsftpd chroot for users
- Cannot connect to the internet
- Fedora 5 What is Beagle?
- Modem Problem with Suse Version 10.1
- Where is mozilla installed?
- debian install
- Test of Posting to Newsgroup
- gdm login screensaver
- problems mounting external drive
- Debian installer does not recognise ataraid array
- PC Problem on boot up
- debian setup PCI devices
- wireless and madwifi installation problem.
Writing an img file to a pen drive Posted: 25 Jul 2006 10:30 PM PDT Tom Duff wrote: And write to Fedora Core about the confusing README file: suggest what you would have found helpful to make things work. In particular, I don't konw of Windows tools that could write such a USB drive from an image. Does anyone else, so I can point FC5 potential users to it? |
Does vsFTPd+SSL+virtual users works? Posted: 25 Jul 2006 10:24 PM PDT Nico Kadel-Garcia escreveu: Thank you very much. Yes, I have thinking to use Apache+SSL+WebDAV? Does WebDAV works well under SSL, please? Best Regards, Vinicius. |
Mandriva 2006.0 - too smart by a half? Posted: 24 Jul 2006 06:52 PM PDT "Chris F.A. Johnson" <com> writes: Unfortunately there is. The shutdown bug is hidden in the script libmsec.py. There is NO config variable to be set to change that behaviour. You have to rewrite the script. And the msec.py changing stuff is also not governed by any config variables you also have to rewrite msec.py to fix the bug. |
Posted: 24 Jul 2006 02:56 PM PDT net wrote in news:com: Root and /etc have far more of an effect that home does - you could just tgz /home onto a floppy disk more than likely. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
vector linux laptop presario change resolution Posted: 24 Jul 2006 06:57 AM PDT On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:57:37 +0200, Sven Neibeg wrote: The file is /etc/X11/xorg.conf Is that the resolution you get in "X", are you in the GUI? If so, then you need to have something like this at the bottom of the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file: Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection EndSection From the command line as root you can also run vasm and then choose xwindow, xconf to reconfigure X automatically. If you have any other problems please visit the VectorLinux forum at http://www.vectorlinux.com/forum2 Larry |
Posted: 24 Jul 2006 06:22 AM PDT nabs wrote: If I may strongly suggest against Courier, I've found it difficult to configure and integrate. Instead, I've been working with Postfix and Dovecot, and been overall much happier. |
Grub: Triboot ubuntu, vista, xp Posted: 23 Jul 2006 10:42 AM PDT On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, bmichalski wrote: For what it's worth, I have the same problem you have. I have Windows NT and Windows 2000, and some Linux partitions. To boot Windows, I have to choose either Windows NT or Windows 2000 from Grub. Both lead me to the Windows boot loader, where I then choose either NT or 2000. -- Yves Bellefeuille <ca> Google users: To reply to posts, click "show options" next to the poster's name, and then click "Reply" in the line that says: "Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message" |
Posted: 23 Jul 2006 07:24 AM PDT Nico Kadel-Garcia emailed this: Thanks. |
Posted: 22 Jul 2006 12:51 PM PDT Unruh wrote: Ordinarily you define sound devices in console.perms so that the logged in console user becomes the owner of the sound devices. Check out /etc/security/console.perms and man console.perms FWIW, my /dev/dsp looks like this when I'm logged in: crw------- 1 allen root 14, 3 Jul 22 13:15 /dev/dsp When I log out, it reverts to: crw------- 1 root root 14, 3 Jul 22 13:15 /dev/dsp /etc/security/console.perms has a line in it like: <console> 0600 <sound> 0600 root HTH |
Another quick question...media editors Posted: 21 Jul 2006 08:18 AM PDT "SpankyTClown" <com> wrote in news:googlegroups.com: Just to make it easier - not to usurp the replier - if you hit browse in freshmeat.net, you can narrow it down by category - i.e. - multimedia/video... although the grouping isn't quite perfect. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) ) |
Inplace "upgrade" or migration from WinXP to Ubuntu 6.06 Posted: 21 Jul 2006 08:15 AM PDT On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:15:03 -0700, SpankyTClown wrote: <snip> I don't agree. Incremental backups can save you a lot of work. _Your_ data is what is most important to _you_. You can always reinstall the OS if necessary, but you can't recreate your "birthday party pictures." Your excuse about it "being hard" may land you in hot water if something goes wrong with your install (or with your hardware- hard disks are known to fail, you know). You should assess what you have on backup, and what you need to make that set complete. Otherwise, be prepared to "kiss it goodbye." Note: comment inline. You seem to know what you are doing, but I won't be the one to guarantee that nothing will go wrong with your install. Shit happens. Humans make mistakes. I'd backup I were you. -- http://www.palantir.net/2001/tma1/wav/error.wav |
eth0 not activating at startup | RHEL 4 Posted: 21 Jul 2006 07:45 AM PDT On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.setup, in article <com>, net wrote: and in /var/log/messages - at boot time, you see it complaining about what? If everything is as the boot tool expects - that may work. If something is not set as expected, then it won't. There are a number of things that can go wrong, but you haven't provided enough details to say one way or the other. What kind of network card? Is the "correct" kernel module loading ('lsmod' might show this). How is the card configured - static, BOOTP, DHCP, something else? Old guy |
Posted: 21 Jul 2006 07:09 AM PDT Unruh wrote: Gentleman, I'm going to give you both a hard time about this concept. Any "user account" that is accessible via FTP should be considered compromised, because it's too easy to sniff passwords from FTP. I've met crackers and network monitoring professionals who do so as a matter of course. The manual pages for vsftpd are easy to read and set up an anonymous user access, and the users of normal system accounts can set up something vastly more secure like SSH or SFTP or even HTTPS/WebDAV access to allow moving and re-arranging files in their public FTP directories. In fact, I tend to prefer setting up HTTP anonymous access to the user's public_html directory (or public_html/pub as necessary), and set up HTTPS/WebDAV for their public_html directories. |
Cannot connect to the internet Posted: 20 Jul 2006 12:57 AM PDT "kaari" <com> writes: Run pppconfig as root and follow the instructions. Then use 'pon' to start the connection and 'poff' to stop it. If you need a pointy-clicky interface install gpppon. You should have been given an opportunity to run pppconfig during the installation. -- John Hasler gt.org Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA |
Posted: 19 Jul 2006 10:10 PM PDT Keith wrote: Hit up Google, I just put in "Fedora core 5 beagle" and got a few hits on what it is. From what I gathered, it looks like it's some sort of desktop search tool. cheers, Anthony |
Modem Problem with Suse Version 10.1 Posted: 19 Jul 2006 07:54 PM PDT On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:38:05 -0500, Clois Beckwith wrote: <CUT> <snip> <snip> <PASTE> Please don't top post. I have moved your response to follow the format adopted by this newsgroup. I noticed after I posted that you are using a Intel-537EP. There is a separate source/driver for that chipset. My links refer to Intel-536EP, and that is the wrong driver. It appears version 2.7.95.0 is the latest driver for the 537EP: (split url, again:) http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/T8Clearance.aspx? url=/9284/eng/Intel-537EP-2.70.95.0-suse9.3.tgz&agr=Y&ProductID=1230&DwnldID=9284&lang =eng You said you have tried two versions of Suse. I see that Intel supports Suse version 9.3 directly with a binary driver. Suse 9.3 is a little old, though. The source is the best way, but you'll need to be able to follow their instructions carefully. -- Douglas Mayne |
Posted: 19 Jul 2006 07:16 PM PDT linz lovez wrote: Yes, I tried the google video but there is a puzzle icon which says "click here to download plugin." I have done that 100 times! nothing changes. |
Posted: 19 Jul 2006 07:05 PM PDT Mehere Notthere wrote: And if that doesn't work, try (as root) apt-get install kde .... and if it says that the latest version is already installed, try apt-get install xserver-xorg (there is a potential problem in some Debian installs with the move from the XFree86 to the Xorg server, which is why it might not fire up properly.) If none of those solves your problem, come back and give us more details. If you have a web site somewhere, post the three files created by the following: dmesg > dmesg.txt lspci > lspci.txt dpkg -l \* | grep ^i > packages.txt Then we can help. CC |
Posted: 19 Jul 2006 06:02 PM PDT On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:59:38 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson" <com> Gave us: Were you in the movie "Blazing Saddles" and do people ask you that all the time? |
Posted: 19 Jul 2006 01:33 PM PDT Ron Croonenberg wrote: One way (I can think of maybe) around it is to login as a User and then "Lock the Session" (perhaps this is only available using a larger DE, like GNOME and KDE) - but then you could have the screensaver kick in after a set determined amount of time. Nobody else will be able to unlock it unless they have that user's passwd - which may be a problem ..or not. YMMV I always use Suspend for my monitor(s) - it saves even more energy than a screensaver, but not in conjuction with login..Again YMMV Regards |
problems mounting external drive Posted: 19 Jul 2006 09:54 AM PDT "onetitfemme" <com> wrote in message news:googlegroups.com... Your drive needs to be repartitioned and formatted to something other than what it is (MAC OS?) |
Debian installer does not recognise ataraid array Posted: 18 Jul 2006 03:14 AM PDT Rick Moen wrote: Yeah but that's a Woody image!! But it will come in handy if I want to build my own 2.4 installer for Sarge/Etch and take the next step forward from offering Debian my patch. Ah, good - I'll let you know when I've done mine! CC |
Posted: 17 Jul 2006 08:16 PM PDT ***** charles wrote: I never meant to suggest that the OS is the cause, it was just something that had changed. I looked at the capacitors and some do seem to be swelled at the top. I do not think it is the power supply though, I might swap it out just to see. I know that it would be easier to replace the computer, but it is just my fooling around computer that I was using to run linux. I do not really need to replace it, but I would like to have another working computer here. I might try replacing some of the capacitors to see if that works. If it does not, then I might just keep the case and rebuild it. There was mention of putting in a installer disc, but the problem happens exactly the same when I try to boot with one of those discs. I fear it is a motherboard problem and I will have to replace it. Suck. |
Posted: 17 Jul 2006 06:11 PM PDT iforone wrote: whoops -- perhaps 'wlan0' (rather than ath0)?? This appears to be Debian specific; www.sown.org.uk/index.php/DebianHostAp but all elements may not apply... Regards |
wireless and madwifi installation problem. Posted: 17 Jul 2006 03:10 PM PDT >about my system: I have a laptop t42 (ibm) with fedora 5. wireless OK, that means that the driver is either not loaded or had problems when it tried to load. Look in /etc/modprobe.conf to see if there is something there (ie some driver to be loaded). If there is, run modprobe nameofdriver and see if there are online errors or errors at the end of dmesg|tail That means that you do not have the kernel source installed. Look on your installation CDs (or whereever you installed from ) for an rpm that starts with kernel-source and ends with .i386.rpm Install it rpm -Uhv /path/to/your/CD/kernel-source*i386.rpm Yes, it means that the interface wifi0 does not exist, which iwconfig already told you ( actually wifi0 is not an interface name any driver I know of uses anyway). You need either a native driver for your wirelss card lspci|less and look for the wireless card. or you need to use ndiswrapper ( ndiswrapper should be on the installation CD. Install it with rpm and then do ndiswrapper -l <nameofwindowsfile.inf> where the argument is the path to and the name of the inf file for the windows driver from the windows CD that came with the wireless/laptop. |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Linux To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |