Back-end Server - Microsoft Exchange |
- Back-end Server
- Exchange active sync
- Sender-ID, SPF
- do I have sp2?
- Automatically purge deleted items?
- Create user specific rule on ESM?
- Metabase Update Warnings
- delivering emails takes about 2 hours
- Default SMTP Virtual Connector
- Diagnostics Logging Files
- Outlook 2003 users cannot connect through vpn"
- No Address on Bounced Email
- View additional mailboxes in Outlook Web Access;
- Multple Sites
- The Store.exe process uses 100 percent of CPU resources
- 5.5 to 03
- A/P Exchange 2003 SP2 Cluster RAM Upgrade: Best Practise?
- BackupExec 10d issues
- Free/busy schedule issues
- Start error - nnwinsdr.exe
- Email Disappear in OWA
- Disk Latency
- Default reply address
Posted: 27 May 2006 06:28 PM PDT We are running an A-P cluster and are running OWA ssl. I would like to use forms based authentication but is grayed out and Microsoft says that they do not support it. It then says that we need to use a FE server. So if I make my server a FE-BE server this would solve my issue and would allow me to use the forms based instead of having a pop-up for login purposes. What my main goal is, is to get my users to use a login web page instead of a pop up. It justs looks more professional. "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 26 May 2006 08:01 PM PDT Yes it is. And your right direct push works for a while and then gets less and less reliable. "Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" wrote: |
Posted: 26 May 2006 07:32 AM PDT How do you mean? I have set the Sender-ID service to reject messages that fail validation, forcing the sending server to generate an NDR. I have added my Exchange server to the list of servers that handle incoming mail messages. My server my ISPs relay server are the only servers that handles incoming SMTP messages for my organisation and I have added both to the list on the Message Delivery General tab. What more do I need to do, apart from enabling it on the SMTP virtual server which I had done but have had to disable because of a problem I am having. TIA, Jarryd "Bharat Suneja" <org> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... |
Posted: 26 May 2006 07:13 AM PDT Where the extracted files are, first read the ReleaseNotes.htm There is important stuff you need to know. Then in the folder \setup\i386 run update.exe "Matt" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:com... |
Automatically purge deleted items? Posted: 26 May 2006 05:29 AM PDT On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:29:35 -0400, Jaz wrote in microsoft.public.exchange.misc: Just to clarify the nomenclature: I believe that what you mean is known as `Empty "Deleted Items" Folder`; "purging" is what happens when items are deleted from the dumpster. Peter Lawton has already provided the path to that setting in Group Policy. In Exchange System Manager (ESM): Mailboxes: View - pick your columns. -- Michael Bednarek http://mbednarek.com/ "POST NO BILLS" |
Create user specific rule on ESM? Posted: 25 May 2006 05:42 PM PDT In news:com, Rebecca <microsoft.com> typed: If he can't do it in OWA, or as a server-side rule in Outlook (for Windows), likely not. |
Posted: 25 May 2006 01:15 PM PDT Thanks Leif, In fact, I was a bit quick. I didn't mean unistall/reinstall IIS, but simply reset the default virtual directories that are required to provide Outlook Web Access, Exchange ActiveSync, and Outlook Mobile Access services in Exchange Server 2003 - which is not quite the same thing... I am sorry for the misunderstanding - but thanks for the link on reinstalling Exchange which could be quite useful... Regards Nicolas "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... logging |
delivering emails takes about 2 hours Posted: 25 May 2006 12:31 PM PDT This is a internet header from an email sent from yahoo... "Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from web52604.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.48.207]) by esiex2.ESI.LOCAL with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 26 May 2006 20:29:17 -0600 Received: (qmail 78746 invoked by uid 60001); 26 May 2006 19:21:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yoAKuJMEt1cpe1Uy2nBGvCOyAABnphWje3fczmJd2r3I7tkF RrMjrMywlkH/Qvl2WoWTfy+ErwXUyGFpmnGlSg38Y9LH3sVYWDBXbIbNZbLyh2 55UGYBypr/adkB7m1W0mhzG74UuXG12qDWihk92ZCVAygfWbkU9fJRu2gdpP s= ; Message-ID: <mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.123.220.198] by web52604.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 26 May 2006 12:21:06 PDT Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:21:06 -0700 (PDT) From: florin robete <com> Subject: Hello To: com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1702772078-1148671266=:76889" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2006 02:29:17.0850 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A842FA0:01C68135] --0-1702772078-1148671266=:76889 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-1702772078-1148671266=:76889 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-1702772078-1148671266=:76889--" Thank you. "Asher_N" wrote: |
Default SMTP Virtual Connector Posted: 25 May 2006 09:03 AM PDT Lief: Yes, thank you. I found this reference yesterday and followed the instructions. All appeared okay. This morning the Connctor was gone. Go figure... Regards, -Mike "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 25 May 2006 02:49 AM PDT Thanks - so obvious... grr... "Andy David - MVP" <com> wrote in message news:com... MSExchangeMU |
Outlook 2003 users cannot connect through vpn" Posted: 24 May 2006 04:59 PM PDT Lawrence, I can access the resources on the exchange server. Michael, i will try your suggestion. Thanks, "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote: |
Posted: 24 May 2006 06:30 AM PDT BTW, they are legit messages going out. "Absolutely" <never> wrote in message news:supernews.com... |
View additional mailboxes in Outlook Web Access; Posted: 23 May 2006 12:45 PM PDT In news:com, paulie <microsoft.com> typed: You need full mailbox access....granted in ADUC in that mailbox's properties (exchange advanced, mailbox rights). Then you should be able to use your own credentials. |
Posted: 23 May 2006 07:52 AM PDT Leif, thanks for your reply, i worked with you comments, but now i'd like some understanding, see inline "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message news:%phx.gbl... its a file share solutions across a WAN at LAN speed then when is AD not replicating, maybe across differnt domains in the same forest will it keep it for a couple of days only because its a second exchange server in the domain or is it by default keeping all undeliverable mail in the queue, and either way is this configurable what benefit or advantage will have by creating routing groups, keep in mind that I cant put a restriction on when mail should be delivered so will that answer my pervious question, will the other site not see both public folders with out a routing group? and how will it show up assuming its setup properly will it also show up in the public folder tree in outlook |
The Store.exe process uses 100 percent of CPU resources Posted: 23 May 2006 06:47 AM PDT Don't delay! "Jim McBee [MVP Exchange]" <spambegone.net> wrote in message news:u%phx.gbl... |
Posted: 22 May 2006 02:20 PM PDT Thank you Mark. I really appreciate the response. Since I have already added all the user accounts to AD via the NT4 upgrade, do I skip the account and group migration process and go straight to the ACL migration and active directory connector to move the mailboxes? I would like to use both 5.5 and 03 at the same time during the move day. Also, will I be "moving" or "Copying" the mailboxes? Thanks! "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: |
A/P Exchange 2003 SP2 Cluster RAM Upgrade: Best Practise? Posted: 22 May 2006 06:32 AM PDT Thanks Bharat :o) "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <spam.org> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 21 May 2006 11:43 PM PDT Nicolas, I hope you can understand why there would be this confusion since you never mentioned Exchange anywhere in your issue. Perhaps you would care to elaborate on your problem and we may be able to help you. Please include a full description, errors, event log errors, etc. "Nicolas Macarez" <fr> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Posted: 19 May 2006 06:14 AM PDT Hi, Have you tried to run cleanfreebusy on both clients (both the ones that are not published and the ones that can't see the published data)? Leif <com> wrote in message news:googlegroups.com... |
Posted: 18 May 2006 01:02 PM PDT In news:com, whatever <microsoft.com> typed: Where is the file? When I googled, I found only a few hits and they mentioned a novanet folder. |
Posted: 18 May 2006 09:22 AM PDT Following on from what Missy mentioned. That would be true if the Outlook and Outlook Web Access were open at the same time and the messages were being pushed to a PST file. |
Posted: 18 May 2006 05:57 AM PDT John, Thanks for the information. I guess we need to determine how to go from 5 to 10 now... Thanks again, "John Fullbright [MVP]" wrote: |
Posted: 17 May 2006 02:48 PM PDT When he replied to it, did he insert "Customer Support" in the From field? -- Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: www.exchangepedia.com/blog ---------------------------------------------- "Debra Westfall" <com.(donotspam)> wrote in message news:com... |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |