tape drive: Error with sense data - Forums Linux |
- tape drive: Error with sense data
- Problem with 2 users in diferent groups
- Mounting non-Linux partitions
- help with allowing ftp access.
- debian sarge DVD apt setup fails during base install
- rw vs. umask in mount call, also, conditional mounting
- Grub: can grub execute a script/batch file?
- Laurenz Albe: I apolgise.
- Changed root permissions, can't log on..
- To kernel 2.6.8:after compiling and installing, no initrd.img generated
- do you need to 'register' a custom module in linux 2.6.x
- What happened to GRUB?
- How to enable new videocard in Fedora?
- [Debian/Knoppix] LVM at boot time
- SB 16 ISA
tape drive: Error with sense data Posted: 08 Oct 2004 05:36 AM PDT [cold.system removed, non-existant group col.help removed] [FollowUp-To: header set to col.misc] "Mr. Murphy Wong" <hk> writes: [...] [...] [...] Why didn't you simply change the tape? "Sense key medium error" is indicating that the tape itself is damaged. That should have been your first target. Michael -- Michael Buchenrieder * greenie.muc.de * http://www.muc.de/~mibu Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address. |
Problem with 2 users in diferent groups Posted: 08 Oct 2004 01:32 AM PDT Deiviz <com> wrote: Change the directory's mode to use bsd file creation semantics. Set the directory to g+sw, and make sure its group is "sharegroup". Peter |
Posted: 07 Oct 2004 06:45 PM PDT the black rose wrote: You can simply type your entry into /etc/fstab, and there are other entries there to use as examples. But if the partition is NTFS, be careful -- writing is not safe. -- Paul Lutus http://www.arachnoid.com |
help with allowing ftp access. Posted: 07 Oct 2004 12:14 PM PDT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 me wrote: [snip] This is better. The "connection refused" error occured because you had no ftp server running. The "421 Service not available" error comes directly from the ftp server. A "4xx" level message is one that indicates a transient error condition. The "x2x" level of the message indicates that it is a reply referring to a control or data connection. So, you are connecting with a live ftp server, and it is telling you that it cannot let you continue. So, this indicates an ftp server configuration condition that's causing the ftp server to refuse connections. Take a look at the man page for your ftp server (in.ftpd) and see what configuration files are used. Take a look at those files, and see if there's anything that would cause the server to reject the connection with a 421 error. Try the /etc/ftpaccess file, and see if there are any date/time limits set, or client address restrictions. - -- Lew Pitcher Master Codewright & JOAT-in-training | GPG public key available on request Registered Linux User #112576 (http://counter.li.org/) Slackware - Because I know what I'm doing. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBZeOyagVFX4UWr64RAvFAAKCuq+vjZPUMQMKAB0xfc8 JPhKfSsQCgwZem 4VCXYpWB7BWpU1FUSazrFAo= =XevG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
debian sarge DVD apt setup fails during base install Posted: 07 Oct 2004 11:42 AM PDT On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:10:50 -0700, Paul Lutus wrote: Did all of the above before seeking help here. As of tonight I was able to get it working. Ran base-config for the twenty-somethingth time, and during apt configuration chose filesystem as opposed to editing sources.list, pointed to /usr/local/src/dvd1 and apt was happy. It may be that when I first tried to do it that way with the actual DVD that I forgot to mount the disc. I shouldn't be making that mistake after the last few years of using linux, but at this point I won't swear I didn't. Next step is to start over from scratch and see if it works correctly this time. I want to identify what and where I find any glitch other than the user ... if there are any;-) Thanks, Paul, for your response. Nemomarii |
rw vs. umask in mount call, also, conditional mounting Posted: 07 Oct 2004 08:28 AM PDT On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 08:28 -0700, gonzalo briceno wrote: The 'rw' option is something passed to the mount command that tells it to mount the selected item as both readable and writable; 'ro' is the complementary option, which says to mount it as 'read only'. If you specify 'ro' then that will set the *entire* item as read only, *regardless* of individual file permissions. The umask basically sets up the 'default' permissions set that will be applied to any new file created within that mountpoint (actually, it's a bit more complicated than that; check 'man 2 umask' for details--it's essentially a 'mask' for allowable permissions). Essentially, requested permissions => umask filter = actual permissions applied to created file. Note, you can use chmod to change the actual permissions of the file later; the umask only applies to newly created files. Well, technically, no, because the mount command defaults to whichever option (rw vs. ro) is most appropriate for the media (I believe so anyway; somebody please correct me if I'm wrong, as the man page doesn't specify). For instance, a CDROM will always be mounted as 'ro' because 'rw' is meaningless to a CD. However, it's always better to explicitly specify it in the /etc/fstab file, just so it serves as a reminder of how the mount point is set up. Anyway, your presumption isn't true; if you want to be able to write to the mount point *at all*, you *need* to specify the 'rw' option (whether explicitly or through mount presuming it for you). Yup. If you need to *ever* be able to write to the device, you *need* to specify the 'rw' option, either explicitly or through mount presuming it for you. If you specify 'ro', you won't be able to write to that device *at all*, regardless of individual file permissions. Think of it as a master override. Probably not the way you're thinking. Each slot on your card reader is a separate drive, as far as Linux is concerned, so each slot is assigned its own device, regardless of whether there's actually a card present or not (technically, /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are the drives themselves; /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 refer to the first partition on the media inserted into the drive). You *can* (and should) have a separate line in /etc/fstab for each slot. Entries in /etc/fstab just define *how* to mount the device, not whether it is *actually* mounted (well ... actually, mount scans entries in /etc/fstab at bootup to determine which ones to mount automatically, by checking for the 'auto' and 'noauto' tags). Supermount has nothing to do with recognizing new drives and/or partitions; *all* it handles is the mounting and unmounting of removable media (CDs, floppy disks, media cards, etc). The detection of new potential devices is handled through the hotplug mechanism. Try unplugging your card reader; if everything's set up correctly, the entries in /etc/fstab defining the slots in your card reader will shortly disappear. Once you plug it back in, they should shortly reappear (although they will be the defaults that Mandrake sets up, rather than any customizations you may have made). |
Grub: can grub execute a script/batch file? Posted: 06 Oct 2004 06:35 PM PDT Sean Cleary <com> wrote: Then why do you ask the boot loader to do it now, instead of leaving it to the [d]O/S, like you did before? Oh. Well, the windows o/s as it comes has no driver for linux file systems, so you would have to put your grub.conf and other stuff on a vfat filesystem so that windows can edit it (and so can linux). Grub is lacking in the "do what I want, not what you want me to do" department. Well, you can't do that all in grub. The grub boot loader (second stage?) reads the conf file to find out what image or boot sector it ought to transfer control to next. That's where the "default" info comes from. There is no "default" info implanted into the boot sector or map file as with lilo, so you have toedit that file. Thus you need to boot an operating system that can launch an application that can edit it. It seems to me that you will have to handle the windows "default" by doing whatever trick you did before with msdos and moving into place a grub.conf file that says "boot to a windows boot sector and let it decide via its boot.ini what to do next". Well, find out. File: grub.info, Node: Command-line and menu entry commands, Prev: General co The list of command-line and menu entry commands ================================================ These commands are usable in the command-line and in menu entries. If you forget a command, you can run the command `help' (*note help::). * Menu: * blocklist:: Get the block list notation of a file * boot:: Start up your operating system * cat:: Show the contents of a file * chainloader:: Chain-load another boot loader * cmp:: Compare two files * configfile:: Load a configuration file * debug:: Toggle the debug flag * displayapm:: Display APM information * displaymem:: Display memory configuration * embed:: Embed Stage 1.5 * find:: Find a file * fstest:: Test a filesystem * geometry:: Manipulate the geometry of a drive * halt:: Shut down your computer * help:: Show help messages * impsprobe:: Probe SMP * initrd:: Load an initrd * install:: Install GRUB * ioprobe:: Probe I/O ports used for a drive * kernel:: Load a kernel * lock:: Lock a menu entry * makeactive:: Make a partition active * map:: Map a drive to another * md5crypt:: Encrypt a password in MD5 format * module:: Load a module * modulenounzip:: Load a module without decompression * pause:: Wait for a key press * quit:: Exit from the grub shell * reboot:: Reboot your computer * read:: Read data from memory * root:: Set GRUB's root device * rootnoverify:: Set GRUB's root device without mounting * savedefault:: Save current entry as the default entry * setup:: Set up GRUB's installation * automatically * testload:: Load a file for testing a filesystem * testvbe:: Test VESA BIOS EXTENSION * uppermem:: Set the upper memory size * vbeprobe:: Probe VESA BIOS EXTENSION Note "savedefault". Peter |
Posted: 06 Oct 2004 06:33 PM PDT Laurenz Albe <com> wrote in message news:<ck2sge$htd$nextra.at>... No, you are not a trouble maker. You are a kind helpfull person. Sean |
Changed root permissions, can't log on.. Posted: 06 Oct 2004 04:37 PM PDT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message In comp.os.linux.setup Moe Trin <example.tld>: Yup, quite shorter and seems to work, I'll see if I can remember next time typing the command.;) -- Michael Heiming (GPG-Key ID: 0xEDD27B94) mail: echo qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBZY7ZAkPEju3Se5QRAlvnAKDSV//KC5kuL0SmV2jcMlPx55rHswCfbGV9 oUUVCfELPAkTK3M8jDefGaM= =KEsi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
To kernel 2.6.8:after compiling and installing, no initrd.img generated Posted: 06 Oct 2004 11:26 AM PDT In comp.os.linux.setup, wildchild uttered these immortal words: I use this: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html It talks about a 2.4 kernel but it works with 2.6 as well. It's never failed for me. -- Andy. |
do you need to 'register' a custom module in linux 2.6.x Posted: 06 Oct 2004 10:17 AM PDT On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 10:17 -0700, gonzo wrote: Modules in 2.6 end in a .ko extension (for "kernel object"); however, using a 2.4 module in 2.6 will, very likely, just fail to work, as the API is certainly different (although perhaps not in ways that matter to this module), and the ABI is probably different. AFAIK, the only way to use a 2.4 module in 2.6 is to recompile it from source, using the desired 2.6 kernel as the base. If the APIs that the module relies on have not changed, that should work; if they have changed, then the module will need to be adapted to the 2.6 APIs. Also, if you do not have MOD_VERSIONS enabled, this just won't work, period, as the kernel will be unable to verify which ABI the module is compiled for. It *may* appear to install, but I wouldn't rely on it. After a quick search, however, I'd guess your hopes of getting it to work under 2.6 are probably doomed; check http://netevil.org/node.php?nid=90 You can also check out the same search results I browsed through at http://www.google.com/search?q=rtl8180%20linux%202.6 |
Posted: 06 Oct 2004 01:18 AM PDT On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:33:01 -0700, Nick the bubble wrote: Good, now boot with the FC2 installation CD or DVD at the displayed menu screen type; linux rescue Answer a few questions and read the screens as they appear, they will tell you how to use the 'chroot' command. Follow the chroot instructions and type something like; /sbin/grub-install --recheck /dev/hda -- Hi! I'm a .sig virus! Please copy me to your .sig! so I can spread This E-mail is safe, no Microsoft products were used in creating me! |
How to enable new videocard in Fedora? Posted: 05 Oct 2004 01:40 PM PDT Digital Puer <com> wrote: Are you sure it is supported? I looked at http://www.nvidia.com/object/products_supported.html and it wasn't there... Laurenz Albe |
[Debian/Knoppix] LVM at boot time Posted: 04 Oct 2004 09:44 PM PDT Bill Marcum <com.urgent> wrote: Well, er, : $ cat /etc/modules # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with # a '#', and everything on the line after them are ignored. jbd dm-mod ext3 rtc ide_scsi .... etc so, the point is not here. -- Laurent Bloch - http://mssi.auteuil.inserm.fr - INSERM |
Posted: 03 Oct 2004 09:18 AM PDT Dzn wrote: You never said what the problem was. No sound? Since your sb module is running my guess is that everything's fine, but you need to turn up the volume with a mixer. I have a Soundblaster 16 ISA non-PnP soundcard and whenever I install a new system I have to personally enable it. I've always had good luck running sndconfig. -- OS squared: open software times open standards. |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Linux To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |