Pages

Search

Exchange 2003 booting from SAN ?? - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2003 booting from SAN ?? - Microsoft Exchange

Exchange 2003 booting from SAN ??

Posted: 04 Jul 2004 01:53 AM PDT

You also want to check with your Microsoft reps to ensure that they haven't
changed their mind about recommended configurations. Oh, and supported.
There was a lot of flip-flop thinking in previous versions as to whether or
not Microsoft would recommend/support boot from SAN. While your SAN vendor
and HBA vendor provide the pieces, ultimately there would be a lot of finger
pointing if you don't have everything worked out ahead of time with all
vendors in the mix.

Al



"Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 
Storage 

Exchange 5.5 on Windows NT in Active Directory

Posted: 03 Jul 2004 05:10 PM PDT

This may be because of a service pack or hotfix that actively prevents
NT4 based authentication or it may be somehting entirely less sinister

in these circumstances work your way through

Time Sync
Name Resolution
Machine Authentication

Does your WINS Server have the 2003 DC as a record yet ?

Just some thoughts...




On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:49:58 GMT, "CJ" <net> wrote:
 

================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================

Exchange to Exchange info transfer?

Posted: 03 Jul 2004 02:06 PM PDT

You could do that, it doubles your work when you move back to a new
server with the original name. Personally, I'd move them just once and
modify the Outlook install point to point to the new server, or create
a DNS record for the old server which points to the new server(after
you decommission it of course) and if the clients have your current
domain in the domain suffix search order, it'll resolve properly.

In the last exciting episode, "Midnight Java Junkie" <com>
wrote:
 

exchange config question

Posted: 03 Jul 2004 12:03 PM PDT

I think what you're after is to have the client read the existing headers
and convert them to SMTP format when it's forwarded outside of the corporate
system. Else, have it keep the message "normalized" by leaving as it always
looks with friendly names (or GAL display names in this case).

Some background on how those fields get there:

There's two places where the body of the message can get that information
put into it. The client - typical or at the server - atypical in many
cases. Exchange has a way, as Chris mentions to change the resolveP2
behavior, but that's not going to go through the body of the message and
change those that already exist. For example, if alice send bob a message.
bob replies to alice. The current headers look like:
From: Bob
To: Alice
Subj: RE: response to original.

When Alice forwards to com, the headers look like:

From: Alice
To: com
Subj: FW: RE: response to original

And the body of the message looks like:

blah blah blah

-----------------------------------------
From: Bob
To: Alice
Subj: RE: response to original.
 
 
 

To accomplish what you want to do with reliable results, you need to
basically write a program that for every outbound message looks in the body,
and tries to discern the recipients from the GAL and rewrite them in place;
that would be very expensive in terms of computational power IMHO. You
could optionally modify the UA templates to include that information but it
would include that information for all messages and would be client side
logic (which it is partially today.) The resolve P2 is for inbound messages
and tells Outlook to display the SMTP address vs. resolving the P2 header to
an incoming message.

Here's a description of the ResolveP2 functionality ICYGAF
http://blogs.msdn.com/dlemson/archive/2004/03/27/100558.aspx


"Chris Scharff [MVP]" <pbz> wrote in message
news:com... 
Hopefully, 
or 
(org) 
forwards 
with 
and 

Users failing to log in to Exchange on some PCs but not others.

Posted: 02 Jul 2004 10:27 AM PDT


Have you checked the Advanced properties of the Ms Exchange server
services for the outlook client/mailbox, what does it say in Logon network security ??
If it is set to None, you will be prompted to login.. (at least in OL2000) if so, set it
to NT Password Auth (or whatever it needs to be in your domain/outlook environment).\
Also, are there domain user login restrictions to certain workstations (check that), and
failed login attempt count, where the actual user account is being locked out
of the domain for failed attempts.. for the domain policy..


"Mark Eades O2" <net> wrote in message news:cc45u1$1d8$btinternet.com... 

Out of Office Set But NOT WORKING

Posted: 02 Jul 2004 07:04 AM PDT

"Vin" <vin10990atyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 
have 
auto 

IIRC, the default settting in Exchange 5.5 is to disable out of office
replies to the internet. If you open Exchange Administrator and get
properties of the Internet Mail Service and choose the Advanced Options
button on the General tab, see if the option for "disable out of office
replies to the internet" is checked.

todd

Accessing virtual directory from XP home

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 08:02 PM PDT

....and make sure that you enter the user id in the format Domain\username

Jamelia

OWA and Win XP

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 03:33 PM PDT

Hi Arnold,
I am not sure it is an IE issue. I tired it with Netscape
7 too. What is interesting is that Netscape does not
display the "Client" section of the login screen, where
you select "Premium" or "Basic". Also, any attempt to
login, using Netscape, results in:
"You could not be logged on to Outlook Web Access. Ensure
that your user name and password are correct, and then
try again."

In IE, if I select "Basic" instead of "Premium", things
work except that I loose all the functionality of
the "Premium" selelction.

TIA. 
use 
on 
all 
Internet 
you're 

OWA Segmentation

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 01:13 PM PDT

It's both a key in the Exchange server registry (per server) and an AD attribute (per user).
I didn't test it on E2k3. If you're using a standard AD2000 you have to extend the schema to add this attribute (see Exchange 2000 SP2 or 3).

Regards,
Marc

"Robert" wrote:
 

About OWA

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 08:47 AM PDT

My answer may sound simple but did you try with adding the mailbox name at the end of the URL, with a / just before?

Marc Lognoul

"MAD" wrote:
 

Groupwise -> Exchange 2003

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 08:45 AM PDT

Thanks for the info. I went back and re-read my second
question. I really mangled that first sentence. I must
have jumped a track in my brain when I was typing that!

I need the hotfix for KBA 837794

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 08:28 AM PDT

Thanks guys, I have it and have installed it.

John

"Matthew Byrd [MSFT]" wrote:
 

Moving Mailboxes between different servers and sites

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 07:43 AM PDT

In the last exciting episode, "Morley Lee" <com>
wrote:
 

Upgrade to Exchange 2003 and use the new E2K3 SP1 mailbox move
functionality.

--
Chris Scharff
MessageOne
http://www.messageone.com

-- ROT13 for valid SMTP address --

Mailbox Naming Conventions

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 06:00 AM PDT

In Exchange 5.5 you can't change the directory name, it
was fixed in E2K. Deleting the outlook profile and
recreating it should fix the problem. 
that 
I 
can 
page, 

Querying e00.chk

Posted: 01 Jul 2004 03:02 AM PDT

Marc Lognoul <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:<com>... 

Thanks Marc (and Mark)

Unfortunately I have no say in what the client does with their
software and I was quite shocked to discover it did not flush the
logs. I already managed to use eseutil to get the info and I can use
this to delete the logs OK. However it is a bit of a cludge and I am
concerned that my script may not cover all eventualities so I have
employed a programmer to do the job.

He seems to think that using ESEUtil is not the best way to go hence
the request to either read the e00.chk file directly or to use and
LDAP query to find the info from the database.

Cheers

James

Exchange running in recovery mode

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 11:18 AM PDT

I tried deleting and recreating the users Outlook
profile. That did not work. I tried uninstalling and
reinstalling Outlook on the client computer and running
the exfrepro.exe tool. That did not work either.

 
managed to fix it is to 
message 
or 
work 
startup? 

Outlook client delays

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 10:15 AM PDT

That generally means one of two things:
a) a network problem
b) the server has a problem

For the server I suggest using performance monitor and watching things like
CPU utilization, and RPC counters. If you see high CPU utilization you know
right away that you have a problem and you will need to figure out what is
causing it (anti-virus/anti-spam products are notorious for being CPU hogs).
If CPU is reasonable then check RPC. Check RPC requests and RPC
operations/sec. If RPC requests is consistently higher than 10 you users
will likely get the popup. A combination of high RPC requests + low RPC
operations/sec usually means something is wrong - the server is having a
problem with something. High + high just means it is very busy.

-GT
"Cody" <none> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 
random 
using 
help 

LANWENCH, help me...

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 09:51 AM PDT

Why not just create a public Calendar so she can post her
schedule in there? You can also make a public contact's
folder. 
folder 

Multiple Email addresses

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 09:37 AM PDT

You can use a rule for this in Outlook - assuming you mean subfolders in the
Exchange mailbox.

Jean wrote: 

Time in Exchange different from WIndows

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 09:05 AM PDT

Glad I could help out


--
Matthew Byrd
Microsoft PSS

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Precision" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:23e1701c45ed3$277f96c0$gbl... 

OWA Error 503 - Getting desperate!

Posted: 30 Jun 2004 08:53 AM PDT

Hi PS,

The big thing I see here is the first test you did. You were unable to open
a web page on the BE server from the FE server while it was in the DMZ.
When you did this test I am assuming that you were just trying to hit a
normal HTML web page placed in a default location. If you are able to hit
that same test page from an internal location (other than the BE server
itself) then I think you have an issue with the Firewall blocking port 80
traffic to and from the BE server.

So try the following set of test to ensure that is the case.

1) Drop a plain web page on the BE server
2) Access that web page from the BE server itself = If Success IIS is
working
3) Access that web page from another server/workstation in your internal LAN
= If Success then IIS is server pages correctly to the network
4) Access that web page from the FE server = If that FAILs then you have an
issue with port 80 being blocked between the FE/BE server.

Hope this helps,

--
Matthew Byrd
Microsoft PSS

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"PS" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Public Folders and OWA

Posted: 29 Jun 2004 01:50 PM PDT

Thank you for your help
Igor
 
use only your own 
public 
get 

how to list all of my email address

Posted: 29 Jun 2004 12:21 PM PDT

thanks a lot!!! 
command found in the 
that you can use and 
you would like from 
utility: 
the display name 
populated. 
your newsreader so 
confers no rights. 
message 
list 
server) 
basically 
there 

Replying to messages when multiple smtp addresses exist

Posted: 29 Jun 2004 12:10 PM PDT

See ChooseFrom application: http://www.ivasoft.biz/choosefrom.shtml

--
Regards,

Victor Ivanidze,
software developer