Is it safe to delete text files under MDBDATA? - Microsoft Exchange |
- Is it safe to delete text files under MDBDATA?
- Repost - Exch. 5.5 to Exch. 2003 question
- Changing Computername - Exchange 5.5 side effects?
- Exchange Highjack?
- deleted mailboxes still around
- disaster help!!
- Exch. 5.5 to Exch. 2003 question
- Help: OWA Authentication problem.
- Transaction log buildup
- Ex2K OWA access help...
- Remove and Exchange 2000 Server
Is it safe to delete text files under MDBDATA? Posted: 04 May 2004 01:02 PM PDT My pleasure. -- Mark Fugatt Exchange MVP http://www.exchangetrainer.com http://www.msexchange.org "Asger" <com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... |
Repost - Exch. 5.5 to Exch. 2003 question Posted: 04 May 2004 09:47 AM PDT Cool, thanks Leif! Lamar "Leif Pedersen [MVP]" <dk> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... to and would box. server) Exchange |
Changing Computername - Exchange 5.5 side effects? Posted: 04 May 2004 07:51 AM PDT Yikes! If you rename an Exchange 5.5 Server then you will find that the msexchangeds service will fail to start afer its rebooted. This is because the dir.edb (the directory) has the SID for that computer account hard coded into it. So if you rename the computer you will get a new SID and as a result the Directory Service won't start. There is know way to get the directory service to start unless you rename the computer back to its original name. The easiest way to do what you want to do is to install a new server into the same site as the existing server (with the new name that you need to implement) and then move mailboxes over to this server. At a later stage you can then rehome any public folders,system folders, & connectors to this new server and then decommission the old server. Ben Wolfe Microsoft PSS This posting is provided 'AS IS' with no warranties and confers no rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. -------------------- Hi! We are planning to change the computername on one of ours Exchange 5.5 servers. How will Exchange react to this and what should we do to fix the side effects? We have to do this since the customer has naming convetntions that has to be followed. Cheers! Christian |
Posted: 04 May 2004 07:21 AM PDT Its exchange 2003 on small buisness server. I went to Exchange system manager-->servers-->Server name-- SMTP connector-6900.doyourtaxesnow.com. sounds like I am being used for relay? what would I do now? authenticated relay, password policy & etc etc etc....see ArticleID=7696 originating from addresses |
deleted mailboxes still around Posted: 04 May 2004 05:01 AM PDT Thanks for the reply. How would I do this in 5.5 Gary |
Posted: 03 May 2004 04:32 PM PDT Very Slick program thanks for the info. "Arlo Clizer [MVP]" <pullman.com> wrote in message news:46.248.16... |
Exch. 5.5 to Exch. 2003 question Posted: 03 May 2004 01:41 PM PDT It is highly not recommended to perform in-place upgrade from E55 to E2K and then to E2K3. Better borrow hardware, introduce second E55 server, move mailboxes there, properly decommission original machine, install W2K3 and E2K3 on that hardware, move mailboxes, decommission intermidiate E55 and be done with it. Romain Pelissier wrote: |
Help: OWA Authentication problem. Posted: 03 May 2004 10:14 AM PDT That is good, leave it at the default settings. -- Tim Hackbart M.C.S.E. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. "Bluehades" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:7bc801c43147$f50fd0f0$gbl... |
Posted: 03 May 2004 09:59 AM PDT being on our servers. I really don't think it is a virus causing the transaction logs to buildup. The problem began when the backup software and some compaq management agents were installed on the server. |
Posted: 02 May 2004 11:02 PM PDT If the problem is only effecting users in specific OU's then its possible that the Exchange Enterprise Servers does not have permissions set on these OU's and hence the Recipient Update Service cannot stamp the users located in those OU's. Run through http://support.microsoft.com/?id=297124 to see if this is the problem. Ben Wolfe Microsoft PSS This posting is provided 'AS IS' with no warranties and confers no rights. Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup purposes only. -------------------- I've narrowed my problem down a bit more. So I am still unable to get new users to connect to Exchange 2000 OWA, however I believe the problem may be related to the users location in Users and groups, please read on. Here's the scenario. Users that are created under the default AD USERS container are able to connect to OWA just fine. However I've created several other containers for organisation called... C1 C2 C3 any users that I create in here are unable to connect to OWA. I guess the question is what would be the difference between a user with Domain\User rights, created in the default USERs container and a new Container? Any help greatly appreciated. T. "Ben Wolfe [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message news:phx.gbl... is box. obviously needs |
Remove and Exchange 2000 Server Posted: 28 Apr 2004 08:35 PM PDT In news:OPjAc%phx.gbl, Terry <com> posted their thoughts, then I offered mine I would replicate them as well. :-) -- Regards, Ace Please direct all replies to the newsgroup so all can benefit. This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights. Ace Fekay, MCSE 2000, MCSE+I, MCSA, MCT, MVP Microsoft Windows MVP - Active Directory HAM AND EGGS: A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig. -- ================================= |
You are subscribed to email updates from TextNData Forums - Microsoft Exchange To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |