Pages

Search

making secondary email address primary - Microsoft Exchange

making secondary email address primary - Microsoft Exchange

making secondary email address primary

Posted: 18 Nov 2008 11:11 AM PST

In article <com>,
microsoft.com says... 

You can still do it in the recipient policy section, creating a FILTERED
Recipient policy based on one of the AD properties (like COMPANY or
Organization), so that as you change them from the Recipient Policy
section that they te through the email system/users based on
their COMPANY settings in their profile.

We have one group with 50 users and 10 different domains, each one has a
recipient policy that is filtered on the COMPANY name.

This has an added benefit of NOT making default email addresses when you
use COPY to create new users. We create a new OU for each company on the
server and then just right click and COPY users to new accounts instead
of using the new user wizards. The only thing you have to remember is to
manually add them to the company website.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undoented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
com (remove 999 for proper email address)

one mailbox - multiple users

Posted: 18 Nov 2008 09:47 AM PST

thanks for the info.

so you cannot create a mailbox without an AD users first.

"Tom" wrote:
 

Storage Usage tool?

Posted: 18 Nov 2008 08:47 AM PST

Sweet! Thanks!

Tom


"Martin Blackstone [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Exchange 2007 - Autodiscover

Posted: 17 Nov 2008 09:42 AM PST

No, nothing changes.
Different ID gets the same result.

"Michael Dragone" <com> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

Exchange 2007 "Poison messages" on PF migration.

Posted: 15 Nov 2008 08:35 PM PST


"Andy David {MVP}" <com> wrote in message
news:com... 

I exported them out, but it only shows as "Folder Content Backfill Response"
from the public folder database. Since the system appears to recover from
them properly, I can pretty much ignore them? So far, it's up to 28 in the
queue, all from public folder tion.

Compatible fax number format

Posted: 14 Nov 2008 06:53 AM PST

There is a Biscom connector in Exchange, but it doesn't specify any domains
in its name space.

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

How to put a calendar in an Exchange Public Folder?

Posted: 13 Nov 2008 07:57 PM PST

Spin <com> wrote: 

To add to Diane's reply - you have to do this in Outlook, not in Exchange
System Manager. You should check the permissions (who has rights to create
top-level folders) in ESM, though. I like to create a top-level folder
called "Company Name" or something, and grant permissions under there,
instead of at the root.

Help moving pagefile!!!!!!

Posted: 13 Nov 2008 12:52 PM PST

BADM <microsoft.com> wrote: 

NP. The fact that you have other (internal) drives in a RAID won't matter.
Just move it to another partition - unless you have other options to free up
space.
 

Importing from Thunderbird

Posted: 13 Nov 2008 10:33 AM PST

I am by no means an expert on this subject(nor do I play 1 on tv) but I found
these links to be valuable to me, as I have been beating my head against the
wall lately trying to make a netscape 7.2 client work with exchange, these
articles deal with getting contacts and mail from netscape products into
outlook.....

http://www.csueastbay.edu/ics/exchange/migrate-contacts.pdf
http://www.csueastbay.edu/ics/exchange/migrate-email.pdf

I have yet to make this old clunker work properly and am about to give up
all hope.

"slawrie" wrote:
 

Send Mail only

Posted: 13 Nov 2008 07:10 AM PST

Thanks.

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" <net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Outlook Web Access Phishing vulnerability on sign-on

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 04:48 PM PST

OK - I can confirm we are already using FBA.

For your information here is the existing information on this vulnerability
:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-0420
http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2008/Oct/0119.html
http://mchangeteam.com/archive/2004/07/26/197289.aspx

Regards
Michael


"Gaurhoth" wrote:
 

#5.0.0 SMTP

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 02:56 PM PST

I have the exact same problem for a customer with SBS server 2003. They are
not blacklisted and this is the only problem he has with sending e-mails
right now. We already checked spellings, recipient e-mail server is not
blocking or filtering anything, domain is whitelisted on recipient e-mail
server.

:-(

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Redirect a email from a specific sender

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 01:10 PM PST

Thanks everybody. The transport rule worked perfectly!!

Jasper
"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
<donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%phx.gbl... 

New user accounts not appearing in Outlook

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 11:06 AM PST

Did you mailbox-enable the user?

Is Outlook running in cached mode? If so, five things have to happen--and
in this order--before recipients show up in the GAL in Outlook 2003 with
cached mode, i.e., the Offline Address Book:
1. The object or change must te to the domain controller the RUS
uses.
2. The RUS must run and stamp the object with Exchange attributes.
3. The offline address book must be generated. This is a scheduled
activity.
4. The OAB system public folder must te to the public folder server
the user's Outlook is using.
5. Outlook 2003 must synchronize itself with the offline address book.
This is directed by Outlook.
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/forcing-an-offline-address-book-to-get-updated.aspx
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"Jon LaBarge" <net> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl... 

Enable retention of deleted items by mailbox-level basis?

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 04:36 AM PST

Spin <com> wrote: 

Do you have deleted item retention enabled on the store(s)? I would, for 30
days if you can afford the space. And enable the dumpsteralwayson reghack
(google for it if you aren't familiar) on all PCs.
 

No....why would you think so? For one thing, I'd hope you were doing full
backups nightly. For another, well, it just won't.
 

That checkbox isn't really relevant to deleted item retention & the purposes
of your post, which is letting users recover stuff from the trash. I'd
enable both.

Error 5.7.1

Posted: 12 Nov 2008 12:05 AM PST

I do not understand what that means.
--
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
..

"mido1971" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

This database can be overwritten by a restore

Posted: 11 Nov 2008 04:19 PM PST

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:44:07 -0800, Chris
<microsoft.com> wrote:
 

That checkbox means just what it says.
Not sure what issue you are addressing.



 

Exchange 2003 server static mappings.

Posted: 11 Nov 2008 03:48 AM PST

Martin Blackstone [MVP] <com> wrote: 

Did you boys finish your homework?

Mailbox Size & Migration Time

Posted: 11 Nov 2008 12:43 AM PST

I can get around 2 GB / Hr here on a single mailbox move. BUT, that number
increases significantly when I do multithreaded mailbox moves.
In other words moving 4 mailboxes at the same time. Last time I did this, I
peaked at 7GB / hr.
But I have pretty powerful storage...

"Girish J Bhatia" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Exchange Public Folders - Calendar Question

Posted: 10 Nov 2008 12:43 PM PST

Jason Fraser <microsoft.com> wrote: 

Then someone must've dragged things into the calendar that don't belong
there. View it by category & see if you can sort on the item type field. If
so, select all but the non-calendar items and edit | copy to new folder. See
if that works....then dump that out to PST. 

One user not receiving Attachments Exchange 2003

Posted: 10 Nov 2008 10:41 AM PST

Ed,

Thanks for your help. I checked the Internet headers and found the
difference was that the one user has a Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
name="winmail.dat" where the others have a Content-Type: application/msword;
name="ARY....doc". Apparently the Exchange Server is stripping off the
winmail.dat file for this user. Others have received winmail.dat files in the
past.

If the server would always pass the winmail.dat attachments, it wouldn't be
a problem.

I have contacted the sender whose emails usually, but not always loose
attachments, about their settings for this contact.

Thanks,
David


"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

How to map old mailboxes with new

Posted: 10 Nov 2008 09:59 AM PST

ok. thanks so much for all of your assistance here.

"Ed Crowley [MVP]" wrote:
 

Synchronisation error Offline Address Book - Help needed.

Posted: 10 Nov 2008 09:44 AM PST

After you did that, the OAB was fixed when Site Folder Maintenance ran; you
could have forced this by dismounting and remounting the PF store.

Glad you got it resolved!

"Siv" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:com... 

Identifying files in Exchange 2003

Posted: 10 Nov 2008 06:45 AM PST

I'll take door number one.



For the truely curious however, that's a mailbox guid. You would have to
search AD for the guid and equate that to a mailbox name. Something like
adfind would do the trick as in http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555433/en-us


"Martin Blackstone [MVP]" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...