| Upgrading Std to Ent Edition Posted: 08 Apr 2004 12:26 PM PDT Are you talking about the technical installation, or the licensing? I'm
wondering the same thing, with the licensing.. I haven't even installed my
standard yet.. but looks like you have to toss it!
"Matt" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1758501c41d9f$5d5b5a10$gbl...
|
| E-mail Delay Times Posted: 08 Apr 2004 05:26 AM PDT I am also wondering if we are still blacklisted out there
somewhere... Cause if a person replies to an e-mail sent
by someone onsite, we get that one right away. But if the
e-mail is a "new" e-mail sent to us from off site it
delays.
and
the
timestamps are
problems
block list
listed for
they could have
it. They could
|
| Exch 5.5 - blocking mail with false address Posted: 08 Apr 2004 04:31 AM PDT "Robin C" <microsoft.com> wrote:
You cannot get exchange 5.5 to do a directory lookup and only accept
mails for matched addresses. For that little gem, you'll need the
current version of Exchange
Mark Arnold MCSA MCSE+M MVP, org
FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm &
http:http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq.htm
|
| Exchange 2003 8331 Error Posted: 07 Apr 2004 11:59 PM PDT As a work around you can reboot the box. This will allow the process to
begin again. It should stay up and running for a while and allow your users
to be stamped by the RUSS.
Definitely call into Microsoft Support to get the fix, however if it is
going to take a while before you can do that you can do the workaround.
--
Hope that helps.
-------------------------
Jaclynn Hiranaka
Enterprise Messaging Support
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
© 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
"Chris" <com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...
response.
RUS
being
a
|
| Outlook 2003 Message-ID madness! Posted: 07 Apr 2004 06:34 PM PDT No, that's a fine answer. It pointed me in the right direction! Just seems
silly to remove something like that, even if it is technically optional..
how hard is a checkbox to enable/disable it? anyway, just ranting..
Since you posted that, I have been trying to make it work. I confirmed that
sending mail through myrealbox.com (my mail provider) with Outlook 2003
results in no message-id (already knew that!).
I setup the SMTP service on W2K. If I send the same message from outlook to
'localhost', it then relays it on, and in the process it DOES add the
message-id header. So, this could be a good temporary solution.
But, I would want the SMTP service to receive from my clients on port 25 as
usual, then forward the mail to my existing server which is on another port
on the LAN. It would continue to receive from the 'net on the WAN
interface. The 'smarthost' setting seems to work good for this and I can
set another port no problem. I just have to figure out how to make it send
on SSL.. this is because with my current server, I can set the port for SMTP
and SSL SMTP separately, and select which interface each is active on, but I
can't set different ports for one service on two interfaces. :(
Thanks for your help.
"neo [mvp outlook]" <mvps.org> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...
to
anymore.
MS..
an
it's
part
is
Only
of
service
on
s
can't
get
message
got
are
compliant -
2003
clients?
|
| Need help to stop relaying on exchange 5.5 Posted: 07 Apr 2004 01:31 PM PDT Matt,
thanks for replying. I looked at IMS and 'always send notifications when
NDRs are generated' was not selected. We have selected 'multiple matches for
an email address has occurred' . I did google search and it seems your
right. It just so happens I downloaded trial of surfcontrol for web and
email filtering. Problems with spam has kept me from setting up surfcontrol.
Hopefully I'll have surfcontrol setup tmrw.
--will
"Matt" <com> wrote in message
news:1a60501c41d9c$34dfea90$gbl...
|
| Restore Public Folder Posted: 07 Apr 2004 11:48 AM PDT Hi willie:
I am having a simular problem like this. I have a tape back of the Public folder store, and I restored it to the originial place of the exchange server by the "Brightstore backup" from CA. For some reason, the exchange can not mount the public folder store any more. Is there anyway I can get the public folder back? Thanks a lot!
|
| individual mailbox size Posted: 07 Apr 2004 10:41 AM PDT Interesting point about Outlook's performance.. a question in that regard..
when using Outlook with Exchange, aren't searches et al. processed on the
server, a-la client-server architecture? So, although it is 'relatively'
slower as the store grows, it should still be faster than an outlook client
with a PST file, right?
Thanks
Jason
"Alex Seigler [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:phx.gbl...
mailbox
rights.
|
| Exchange 2003 problem Posted: 07 Apr 2004 01:25 AM PDT Many thanks to you both.
Contact Microsoft
confers no rights.
wrote in message
attributes on new
System Attendant
other Exchange
and confers no
caught
info on
with no
|
| Upadate described in Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 817809 needed Posted: 06 Apr 2004 11:10 PM PDT I've tried to call support (in Russia) and the
conversation was the following:
Support: What is you product and what is the product
number
Me: I'm using trial version of Exchange and interesting
in buying ...
Support: Sorry, since support is not free, we do not
provide it for trial products
call in, and since
calling support and
know.
confers no rights.
specified at
2003?
our
not
|
